1.Evidence of a Broken Healthcare Delivery System in Korea: Unnecessary Hospital Outpatient Utilization among Patients with a Single Chronic Disease Without Complications.
Jin Yong LEE ; Min Woo JO ; Weon Seob YOO ; Hyun Joo KIM ; Sang Jun EUN
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2014;29(12):1590-1596
This study aims to estimate the volume of unnecessarily utilized hospital outpatient services in Korea and quantify the total cost resulting from the inappropriate utilization. The analysis included a sample of 27,320,505 outpatient claims from the 2009 National Inpatient Sample database. Using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), patients were considered to have received 'unnecessary hospital outpatient utilization' if they had a CCI score of 0 and were concurrently admitted to hospital for treatment of a single chronic disease - hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), or hyperlipidemia (HL) - without complication. Overall, 85% of patients received unnecessary hospital services. Also hospitals were taking away 18.7% of HTN patients, 18.6% of DM and 31.6% of HL from clinics. Healthcare expenditures from unnecessary hospital outpatient utilization were estimated at: HTN (94,058 thousands USD, 38.6% of total expenditure); DM (17,795 thousands USD, 40.6%) and HL (62,876 thousands USD, 49.1%). If 100% of patients who received unnecessary hospital outpatient services were redirected to clinics, the estimated savings would be 104,226 thousands USD. This research proves that approximately 85% of hospital outpatient utilizations are unnecessary and that a significant amount of money is wasted on unnecessary healthcare services; thus burdening the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and patients.
Chronic Disease/*economics/*epidemiology/therapy
;
Comorbidity
;
Delivery of Health Care/economics/utilization
;
Health Care Costs/*statistics & numerical data
;
Humans
;
Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/*economics/*utilization
;
Patient Admission/economics/statistics & numerical data
;
Prevalence
;
Republic of Korea/epidemiology
;
Unnecessary Procedures/*economics/*utilization
;
Utilization Review
2.Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in the treatment plan of gastric cancer.
Haojie LI ; Qi ZHANG ; Ling CHEN ; Lingqiang MIN ; Xuefei WANG ; Fenglin LIU ; Yihong SUN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2017;20(2):195-199
OBJECTIVETo assess the clinical value of the diagnostic laparoscopy in choosing treatment strategies for patients with gastric cancer.
METHODSRetrospective analysis was performed on clinical and pathological data collected from 2 023 patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery in the Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from 2009 to 2014. All the patients were diagnosed as gastric cancer by endoscopic biopsy and staged by imaging examination before surgery. During the diagnostic laparoscopy procedure, a small periumbilical incision was made and a pneumoperitoneum with COunder 10-15 mmHg was established through a port. A 10 mm trocar was put in, and the camera was inserted. Two 5 mm trocars were put in two ports which located in midclavicular line two fingers under the left and right costal margin and then the instruments were inserted. A thorough inspection included ascites, the abdominal cavity, liver, diaphragm, spleen, greater omentum, colon, small intestine, mesentery, adnexa (female) and pelvic floor. If the tumor located at the posterior part of the stomach, the gastrocolic ligament was opened in order to look for carcinomatosis in the omental bursa. The accuracy rate of diagnostic laparoscopy in diagnosing adjacent organ invasion and intra-abdominal metastasis was calculated, and the rate of adjusting treatment plans after diagnostic laparoscopy was also calculated.
RESULTSThere were 52.7%(1 067/2 023) of patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy. The accuracy rate of diagnostic laparoscopy in evaluating adjacent organ invasion and intra-abdominal metastasis were 98.3%(1 049/1 067) and 98.1%(1 047/1 067) respectively. Besides, 14 patients with stage T4b and 32 with intra-abdominal metastasis, which were missed by imaging examination, were diagnosed by diagnostic laparoscopy. The treatment plans of 9.3% (99/1 067) of patients were changed after diagnostic laparoscopy, and 65 (6.1%) cases of non-therapeutic laparotomy were avoided. However, 18 cases of adjacent organ invasion and 20 cases of intra-abdominal metastasis were still missed by diagnostic laparoscopy, and 12 cases received non-therapeutic laparotomy.
CONCLUSIONDiagnostic laparoscopy has considerable value in assessing adjacent organ invasion and intra-abdominal metastasis and has great clinical significance in making precise treatment plans.
Abdominal Neoplasms ; diagnostic imaging ; secondary ; Digestive System ; pathology ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopes ; Laparoscopy ; instrumentation ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Laparotomy ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; diagnostic imaging ; Patient Care Planning ; statistics & numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Surgical Instruments ; Unnecessary Procedures ; statistics & numerical data
3.Unfounded Reports on Thyroid Cancer.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2014;29(8):1033-1034
No abstract available.
Bias (Epidemiology)
;
Early Detection of Cancer/*statistics & numerical data
;
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Palpation/*statistics & numerical data
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
Republic of Korea/epidemiology
;
Risk Factors
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Survival Rate
;
Thyroid Neoplasms/*diagnosis/*mortality/prevention & control
;
Ultrasonography/*statistics & numerical data
;
Unnecessary Procedures/*statistics & numerical data