1.The Prevalence of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome in the Korean Military Compared with the General Population.
Jung Hwan LEE ; Da Hea SEO ; Min Jung NAM ; Geon Hui LEE ; Dong Hee YANG ; Min Joo LEE ; Ung Rim CHOI ; Seongbin HONG
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2018;33(25):e172-
BACKGROUND: Obesity and related metabolic disorders are growing health challenges worldwide and individuals at military service are not exceptions. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MS) in the Korean military and to compare with the general population. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 4,803 young military participants who underwent a corporal health-screening program between October 2013 and October 2014. The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria was used to identify MS. We also sampled 1,108 men aged 19–29 years from the Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey from 2010 to 2013 to compare with their military counterparts. RESULTS: The mean age of military participants was 20.8 ± 1.1 years, and 20.6% (n = 988) were obese. The prevalence of MS was 0.8% in military participants, while 7.9% in general population. The risk factors of MS were less prominent among military participants relative to civilians, with the exception of high blood pressure, of which prevalence was higher among military participants (21.5% vs. 18.2%, respectively). In multiple logistic analysis, high physical activity conferred lower odds of MS and obesity in military participants (odds ratios, 0.19 and 0.81, respectively). Age older than 25 years increased risk of most components of MS among civilians. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of obesity and MS is lower in military participants compared with civilians of similar age. Monitoring of high blood pressure and proper stress management are warranted in those at military service.
Adult
;
Cholesterol
;
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Education
;
Humans
;
Hypertension
;
Korea
;
Male
;
Military Personnel*
;
Motor Activity
;
Obesity*
;
Prevalence*
;
Risk Factors
2.Current Awareness and Use of the Strain Echocardiography in Routine Clinical Practices: Result of a Nationwide Survey in Korea.
Ju Hee LEE ; Jae Hyeong PARK ; Seung Woo PARK ; Woo Shik KIM ; Il Suk SOHN ; Jung Yeon CHIN ; Jung Sun CHO ; Ho Joong YOUN ; Hae Ok JUNG ; Sun Hwa LEE ; Seong Hwan KIM ; Wook Jin CHUNG ; Chi Young SHIM ; Jin Won JEONG ; Eui Young CHOI ; Se Joong RIM ; Jang Young KIM ; Kye Hun KIM ; Joon Han SHIN ; Dae Hee KIM ; Ung JEON ; Jung Hyun CHOI ; Yong Jin KIM ; Seung Jae JOO ; Ki Hong KIM ; Kyoung Im CHO ; Goo Yeong CHO
Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound 2017;25(3):91-97
BACKGROUND: Because conventional echocardiographic parameters have several limitations, strain echocardiography has often been introduced in clinical practice. However, there are also obstacles in using it in clinical practice. Therefore, we wanted to find the current status of awareness on using strain echocardiography in Korea. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide survey to evaluate current use and awareness of strain echocardiography from the members of the Korean Society of Echocardiography. RESULTS: We gathered total 321 questionnaires from 25 cardiology centers in Korea. All participants were able to perform or interpret echocardiographic examinations. All participating institutions performed strain echocardiography. Most of our study participants (97%) were aware of speckle tracking echocardiography and 185 (58%) performed it for clinical and research purposes. Two-dimensional strain echocardiography was the most commonly used modality and left ventricle (LV) was the most commonly used cardiac chamber (99%) for clinical purposes. Most of the participants (89%) did not think LV strain can replace LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in their clinical practice. The common reasons for not performing routine use of strain echocardiography was diversity of strain measurements and lack of normal reference value. Many participants had a favorable view of the future of strain echocardiography. CONCLUSION: Most of our study participants were aware of strain echocardiography, and all institutions performed strain echocardiography for clinical and research purposes. However, they did not think the LV strain values could replace LVEF. The diversity of strain measurements and lack of normal reference values were common reasons for not using strain echocardiography in clinical practice.
Cardiology
;
Echocardiography*
;
Heart Ventricles
;
Korea*
;
Reference Values