BACKGROUND/AIMS: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment for end-stage renal disease patients. Although previous studies have demonstrated that the clinical outcome following living related (LR) KT is better than that following unrelated (LUR) KT in ABO-compatible KT recipients, recent studies showed no differences in clinical outcomes between the two treatments. In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes of LR and LUR KT in ABO-incompatible KT recipients. METHODS: From January 2011 to August 2013, 19 cases of ABO-incompatible KT were analyzed retrospectively. Eight kidneys (7 cases of parent-offspring and 1 case of siblings, Group 1) were donated from living-related donors and 11 (all spousal donors, Group 2) from living-unrelated donors. We investigated patient survival, graft survival, acute rejection, graft function, and complications. RESULTS: On Kaplan-Meier analysis, patient and graft survival during follow-up were 87.5% and 87.5% in Group 1; both were 100% in Group 2. Acute rejection, graft function, and medical and surgical complications were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term clinical outcomes between LR and LUR KT in ABO-incompatible KT recipients were equivalent. Most domestic cases of LUR KT are from spousal donors and the spousal donor will be a major donor in ABO-incompatible KT patients.
Follow-Up Studies ; Graft Rejection ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Kidney Failure, Chronic ; Kidney Transplantation* ; Kidney* ; Retrospective Studies ; Siblings ; Tissue Donors ; Transplantation*

Many transplant recipients believe that exercise or physical activity after transplantation will have adverse effects on the body and the grafted organ, and even more, some of them believe that the grafted organ will tear off from the vascular bed inside of the abdominal cavity. As a result, many recipients are isolated from social life even after successful recovery of the grafted organ function. However, rehabilitation by physical exercise and activity is essential to return to normal social life. In 1978, a transplantee's sport game known as the Transplant Olympics, which later changed to the World Transplant Games, was started to improve the quality of life and develop friendships between transplant recipients globally. This event promotes improvement of recipient's life quality while delivering an important message to the public. This is because by engaging in sports activities, transplantees can show their healthy life after transplantation to the public. This can also improve self-esteem of the family of organ donors and allow them to verify that their decision to donate was not in vain. Additionally, the public can realize the benefits of transplantation and necessity for organ donation. Finally, the early return to social life and normal family life after transplantation will also reduce the national budget for health insurance. Although sports clubs are located in all transplant centers in Korea, no continuous athletic meetings or transplant sport organization exist nationwide. This problem is exacerbated by the lack of concern that transplant physicians and surgeons show toward recipients' physical activity and exercise. Therefore, in this study, we reviewed the significance of physical activity after transplantation and describe the world transplant games and domestic games to enable development of a recipient rehabilitation plan.
Abdominal Cavity ; Budgets ; Exercise ; Exercise Therapy ; Friends ; Humans ; Insurance, Health ; Korea ; Motor Activity ; Quality of Life ; Rehabilitation* ; Sports ; Surgeons ; Tears ; Tissue and Organ Procurement ; Tissue Donors ; Transplant Recipients ; Transplants

A high body temperature, i.e. fever, is a crucial vital sign, and suggests the patient’s infection or inflammation. COVID-19 has changed the lifestyle, and led to the changes in medical use behavior of febrile patients. We investigated the change in etiologies of fever in the emergency department (ED) before and after COVID-19. The medical records of patients with fever who visited the ED of a university hospital before and after the outbreak of COVID-19 in Daegu metropolitan city, South Korea. The cause of fever and its classification were carefully decided and established by agreement through a discussion among board-certified clinicians in emergency medicine, neurology, general surgery, and internal medicine. The etiology of fever and its prevalence in ED were compared between before and after COVID-19. A total of 3,041 patients with fever (> 37.7°C) in the ED were investigated, with 1,400 men (46.0%). Their mean age was 55.88 ± 20.59, and the average number of patients with fever in ED was 8.16 ± 3.94 per a day. The most common etiology before COVID-19 was respiratory system infection (n = 535, 30.5%), followed by gastrointestinal (n = 313, 17.8%) and urinary tract infection (n = 209, 11.9%). However, after COVID-19, gastrointestinal cause became the most common (n = 247, 27.3%), followed by respiratory system (n = 126, 13.9%) and urinary tract infection (n = 102, 11.3%). There has been paradigm-shifting in fever etiology in the emergency department. It is necessary to cope with the changed fever etiology in the COVID-19 era.