1.A Comparative Study of Undergraduate Examinations to Evaluate Medical Students' Performance and the National Examination for Medical Practitioners
Tsuguhiro MIYASHITA ; Toshiro SHIMURA ; Koji ADACHI ; Takumi ARAMAKI ; Kazuo SHIMIZU ; Kazuo DAN
Medical Education 2004;35(4):281-285
To demonstrate the quality assurance of the comprehensive examination of sixth-year students at Nippon Medical School, 4 undergraduate examinations were compared with the national examination for medical practitioners (NEMP) using scatter graphs and Pearson's correlation coefficient. Of the 93 sixth-year students at Nippon Medical School, 57%(n=53) reported their scores on the NEMP in response to a request from the Academic Quality and Development Office. Correlation coefficients of the grade point average (years 1 to 5), average scores on graduation examinations of 24 subjects, scores on the trial examination of NEMP, and scores on the sixth-year comprehensive examination with overall scores on the NEMP were 0.62, 0.46, 0.68, and 0.63, respectively. These results suggest that the sixth-year comprehensive examination is more suitable than are graduation examinations for predicting the NEMP score.
2.Comparison of Fourth-year Comprehensive Examinations and Computer-based Testing in the Nationwide Medical and Dental Student Evaluation System
Tsuguhiro MIYASHITA ; Kazuo SHIMIZU ; Koji ADACHI ; Takumi ARAMAKI ; Toshiro SHIMURA ; Kazuo DAN
Medical Education 2004;35(5):331-336
To demonstrate the quality assurance of comprehensive examinations for fourth-year students at Nippon Medical School, scores on comprehensive examinations were compared with those on a trial of computer-based testing (CBT) of a nationwide medical and dental student evaluation system in 2003. Pearson's correlation coefficients between scores of two comprehensive examinations and the CBT score were 0.45 and 0.67, and the correlation coefficient between the average score of the two comprehensive examinations and the CBT score was 0.55. Fourth-year comprehensive examinations are useful tools for summative evaluation and prediction of CBT performance.