1.Optimal First-Line Antibiotic Treatment for Pediatric Complicated Appendicitis Based on Peritoneal Fluid Culture
Tsubasa AIYOSHI ; Kouji MASUMOTO ; Nao TANAKA ; Takato SASAKI ; Fumiko CHIBA ; Kentaro ONO ; Takahiro JIMBO ; Yasuhisa URITA ; Toko SHINKAI ; Hajime TAKAYASU ; Shigemi HITOMI
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2021;24(6):510-517
Purpose:
Consensus is lacking regarding the optimal antibiotic treatment for pediatric complicated appendicitis. This study determined the optimal first-line antibiotic treatment for pediatric patients with complicated appendicitis based on peritoneal fluid cultures.
Methods:
This retrospective study examined the cases of pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis at our institution between 2013 and 2019. Peritoneal fluid specimens obtained during appendectomy were cultured for the presence of bacteria.
Results:
Eighty-six pediatric patients were diagnosed with complicated appendicitis.Of them, bacteria were identified in 54 peritoneal fluid samples. The major identified bacteria were Escherichia coli (n=36 [66.7%]), Bacteroides fragilis (n=28 [51.9%]), α-Streptococcus (n=25 [46.3%]), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=10 [18.5%]), Enterococcus avium (n=9 [16.7%]), γ-Streptococcus (n=9 [16.7%]), and Klebsiella oxytoca (n=6 [11.1%]). An antibiotic susceptibility analysis showed E. coli was inhibited by sulbactam/ampicillin in 43.8% of cases versus cefmetazole in 100% of cases. Tazobactam/piperacillin and meropenem inhibited the growth of 96.9-100% of the major identified bacteria. E. coli (100% vs. 84.6%) and P. aeruginosa (100% vs. 80.0%) were more susceptible to amikacin than gentamicin.
Conclusion
Tazobactam/piperacillin or meropenem is a reasonable first-line antibiotic treatment for pediatric complicated appendicitis. In the case of aminoglycoside use, amikacin is recommended.
2.The Usefulness of the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to Screen Major Depression for Patients on a Palliative Care Unit: A Case That without No Regular Psychiatrist
Kenji TAKAGI ; Naoyoshi TAKATSUKA ; Tsubasa SASAKI ; Katsuko MORI ; Naomi OGAWA ; Shinji ITO
Palliative Care Research 2018;13(1):69-75
Background: Mental assessment for patients in a palliative care unit with no regular psychiatrist tends to depend on subjective judgments by other health professionals. We introduced the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to screen major depression from patients in a palliative care unit and assessed the usefulness of the questionnaire. Methods: The subjects were all patients who were admitted to a palliative care unit. Each patient was asked to answer the PHQ-9 on admission and then was interviewed by a psychiatrist. When PHQ-9 score was of 10 points and above, the case was judged to be positive for depressive disorder. A psychiatrist diagnosed according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5). Results: A total of 83 patients were hospitalized between January 2016 and October 2016. 50 patients completed PHQ-9 and psychiatrist’s interview. Nine cases were positive by PHQ-9 and diagnosed as depressive disorder by a psychiatrist. Seven cases were positive by the PHQ-9 but not diagnosed as depressive disorder. Although 34 cases were judged to be negative by the PHQ-9, 2 cases of them were diagnosed as depressive disorder. The sensitivity and specificity of the PHQ-9 were 81.8% and 82.1% respectively. Conclusion: We found that the PHQ-9 was useful screening test for depression even in palliative care settings.
3.Effect of Instructions Set by the Dementia and Delirium Support Team on the Management of Insomnia and Restlessness When Changing Electronic Medical Record Vendors
Toshikazu ICHIE ; Noriko KUBOTA ; Chise HONDA ; Megumi YOKODE ; Mayu MINAMIKAWA ; Mika OSAKI ; Tsubasa SASAKI ; Michiyo HIROUMI ; Takeshi MIURA ; Zen NONOGAKI
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2024;73(4):347-355
Use of benzodiazepine (BZD) receptor agonists for delirious or elderly patients has occasionally been found as a result of inappropriate instructions for insomnia or restlessness, according to research of the dementia and delirium support team (DDST), which manages instructions on admission and during hospital rounds. We believe that one reason for this is the lack of hospital guidelines for managing insomnia and restlessness. When changing electronic medical record vendors, we took the opportunity to establish proper drug usage instructions. The percentage of available instructions for insomnia and restlessness at the time of admission and the prescribed medications were surveyed and compared before and after the vendor change. The prescription rate for insomnia was 88.6% (1,779/2,007) before and 91.9% (1,902/2,069) after the change, showing a significant increase. The prescription rate of benzodiazepine receptor agonist use was 47.7% (848/1,779) before and 41.6% (792/1,902) after the change, showing a significant decrease. The prescription rate for restlessness was 71.2% (1,429/2,007) before and 85.6% (1,771/2,069) after the change, showing a significant increase. The recommended drug usage instructions affected prescriptions for insomnia and restlessness at admission and prescriptions of BZD receptor agonist usage at admission. Our findings seem to suggest that setting drug usage instructions for insomnia and restlessness when changing the electronic medical record vendor will be useful for promoting proper medication use.