1.The Effects of Tramadol on Electroencephalographic Spectral Parameters and Analgesia in Rats.
Hwan Soo JANG ; Il Sung JANG ; Maan Gee LEE
The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 2010;14(3):191-198
The effects of different doses of tramadol on analgesia and electroencephalographic (EEG) spectral parameters were compared in rats. Saline or tramadol 5, 10, 20 or 40 mg/kg was administered. The degree of analgesia was evaluated by tail-flick latency, and the degree of seizure was measured using numerical seizure score (NSS). Additionally, band powers, median power frequency and spectral edge frequency 95 were measured to quantify the EEG response. All doses of tramadol produced spike-wave discharge. Tramadol significantly and dose-dependently increased the analgesia, but these effects did not correspond with the changes in the EEG spectral parameters. NSS significantly increased in the Tramadol 20 and 40 mg/kg treatment groups compared to the Control and TRA5 groups, and two rats given 40 mg/kg had convulsions. In conclusion, tramadol dose-dependently increased the analgesic effect, and the 10 mg/kg dose appears to be a reliable clinical dose for analgesia in rats, but dose-dependent increases in analgesia and seizure severity did not correlate with EEG spectral parameters.
Analgesia
;
Animals
;
Electroencephalography
;
Rats
;
Seizures
;
Tramadol
2.Effect of Tramadol in the Teatment of Postanesthetic Shivering.
Jun Seok CHUNG ; Kicheol KANG ; Yong Ju KIM
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 1999;36(6):1003-1007
BACKGROUND: Tramadol is a centrally acting analgesic with weak opioid agonist properties and has effect on the spinal inhibition of pain. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of tramadol in the treatment of postanesthetic shivering. METHODS: Sixty patients (ASA class I/II) who showed postanesthetic shivering were randomly assigned into three groups (n=20): Normal saline group; normal saline 10 ml, tramadol (TRD) 0.5 mg/kg group; tramadol 0.5 mg/kg, TRD 1.0 mg/kg group; tramadol 1.0 mg/kg. And all patients received standard postoperative management in the recovery room. Evaluation of the grade of shivering was done at 30 seconds, 2, 5 and 10 minutes from the beginning of the treatment by the same investigator who had injected the drug. The age, sex, weight, duration of anesthesia and axillary temperature were recorded. RESULTS: By 30 seconds, 2 minutes, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes, 0, 4, 9, 9 patients of the 0.5 mg/kg tramadol group (n=20) and 7, 18, 19, 19 patients of the 1.0 mg/kg tramadol group (n=20) stopped the shivering respectively. But in 3 patients of 0.5 mg/kg tramadol group who stopped shivering by 5 minutes, shivering was recurred within 10 minutes and in 3 patients who had not stopped shivering by 5 minutes, shivering stopped by 10 minutes. In the placebo group, only 1 patient stopped shivering by 5 minutes. CONCLUSION: 1.0 mg/kg of tramadol was effective for the treatment of postanesthetic shivering but 0.5 mg/kg of tramadol was ineffective.
Anesthesia
;
Humans
;
Recovery Room
;
Research Personnel
;
Shivering*
;
Tramadol*
3.Effect of Tramadol in the Teatment of Postanesthetic Shivering.
Jun Seok CHUNG ; Kicheol KANG ; Yong Ju KIM
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 1999;36(6):1003-1007
BACKGROUND: Tramadol is a centrally acting analgesic with weak opioid agonist properties and has effect on the spinal inhibition of pain. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of tramadol in the treatment of postanesthetic shivering. METHODS: Sixty patients (ASA class I/II) who showed postanesthetic shivering were randomly assigned into three groups (n=20): Normal saline group; normal saline 10 ml, tramadol (TRD) 0.5 mg/kg group; tramadol 0.5 mg/kg, TRD 1.0 mg/kg group; tramadol 1.0 mg/kg. And all patients received standard postoperative management in the recovery room. Evaluation of the grade of shivering was done at 30 seconds, 2, 5 and 10 minutes from the beginning of the treatment by the same investigator who had injected the drug. The age, sex, weight, duration of anesthesia and axillary temperature were recorded. RESULTS: By 30 seconds, 2 minutes, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes, 0, 4, 9, 9 patients of the 0.5 mg/kg tramadol group (n=20) and 7, 18, 19, 19 patients of the 1.0 mg/kg tramadol group (n=20) stopped the shivering respectively. But in 3 patients of 0.5 mg/kg tramadol group who stopped shivering by 5 minutes, shivering was recurred within 10 minutes and in 3 patients who had not stopped shivering by 5 minutes, shivering stopped by 10 minutes. In the placebo group, only 1 patient stopped shivering by 5 minutes. CONCLUSION: 1.0 mg/kg of tramadol was effective for the treatment of postanesthetic shivering but 0.5 mg/kg of tramadol was ineffective.
Anesthesia
;
Humans
;
Recovery Room
;
Research Personnel
;
Shivering*
;
Tramadol*
4.A comparison between caudal block versus splash block for postoperative analgesia following inguinal herniorrhaphy in children.
Jun Kong CHEON ; Cheon Hee PARK ; Kan Taeck HWANG ; Bo Yoon CHOI
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2011;60(4):255-259
BACKGROUND: We wanted to determine the postoperative analgesic efficacy of preincisional caudal epidural block versus instillation (splash block) following inguinal herniorrhaphy in children. METHODS: Thirty children (age range: 1-7 years) who were scheduled to undergo inguinal herniorrhaphy were divided into 2 groups: the caudal block group and the splash block group with 15 children in each group. Tracheal intubation was performed. Fifteen children received caudal block with 1.0 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine (Group 1). Caudal block was performed using the loss of resistance method via the sacral hiatus. Fifteen children in Group 2 received local instillation (splash block) in the surgical site with up to 0.4 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine. The patients were observed for 90 minutes in the postanesthesia care unit and then they were transferred to the ward. The pain scores were taken 4 times. We assessed pain using the Faces pain scores. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the pain scores at 10, 30 and 60 minutes upon entering the postanesthesia care unit. The pain scores of Group 1 were slightly lower at the last evaluation point when compared to that of Group 2. One patient in Group 1 required supplemental postoperative intravenous (IV) tramadol, while all the other patients in both groups did not require supplemental IV tramadol. The intraoperative requirement for sevoflurane was decreased in Group 1 as compared to that of Group 2. There were no major complications related to either type of block. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a splash block can have a similar analgesic effect as that of a caudal block for the postoperative herniorrhaphy pain of children.
Amides
;
Analgesia
;
Child
;
Herniorrhaphy
;
Humans
;
Intubation
;
Methyl Ethers
;
Tramadol
5.Effect of Tramadol/Acetaminophen Combination Drug in Acute Pain After Spinal Surgery.
Jae Yoon CHUNG ; Jae Joon LEE ; Hyoung Yeon SEO ; Suk June SHON ; Eun Kyung CHUNG
Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2007;14(3):137-143
STUDY DESIGN: A single center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ultracet(TM) compared with a placebo in the treatment of acute pain after spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Ultracet(TM) is a combination drug of Tramadol and Acetaminophen, and the synergistic effect in pain control was demonstrated by animal experiments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients who satisfied the selection and exclusion criteria after spinal surgery were enrolled in this study. The patients measured perceptible pain relief time and meaningful pain relief time using a two stopwatch technique. The pain intensity (PI) and pain relief (PAR) were recorded at 30 minutes and then hourly over a 4 hour period, and the pain intensity difference (PID), the sum of the pain intensity difference (SPID), and the total pain relief (TOPAR) were also checked. RESULTS: The study and control group comprised of 56 and 20 patients, respectively. The baseline pain intensity was an average of 5.9+/-1.2 in the study group and 6.1+/-1.4 in the control group (p=0.683). The final pain intensity was 2.5+/-2.4 and 4.1+/-2.2 in the study and control group, respectively. The study group was superior to placebo (p=0.008). In addition, the study group was statistically superior in terms of the PID (p=0.025), SPID (p=0.028), and TOPAR (p=0.048), particularly over 2 hours, as well as the overall assessment (p=0.005). The median time of the meaningful pain relief time was 90 and 193 minutes in the study and control group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The analgesic efficacy of Ultracet(TM) was superior to the placebo on the SPID, TOPAR, and the subjects' overall assessments over the 4 hour observation period. These results suggest that Ultracet(TM) is an effective therapeutic option for the management of acute pain after spinal surgery without serious complications.
Acetaminophen
;
Acute Pain*
;
Animal Experimentation
;
Humans
;
Spinal Diseases
;
Tramadol
6.Meta-analysis with meta-regression and systematic review of the efficacy of on-demand tramadol for the treatment of lifelong premature ejaculation.
Philippine Journal of Surgical Specialties 2013;68(3):109-120
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of ondemand tramadol for the treatment of lifelong premature ejaculation.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis with metaregression of trials evaluating the use of tramadol to treat premature ejaculation using intravaginal ejaculation latency time as a measure.Relevant studies were identified using PubMed, Ebscohost,MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Collaboration Library.
RESULTS: This analysis included 8 publications. Study of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) among 599 patients showed that tramadol was effective in subjects with premature ejaculation as seen by the significant difference in mean IELT of tramadol treated patients versus those receiving placebo (mean difference 2.43 minutes; 95% CI 0.93-3.93; P=0.002). The effect on IELT between tramadol and paroxetine was not statistically significant (mean difference -0.58; 95% CI -5.81 to 4.65; P=0.83).Meta-regression analysis showed that the lower the dose of tramadol,the higher its benefit in the prolongation of IELT, however, there was no significant difference (95% CI regression coefficient -0.0956 to 0.0322). There was a significant difference in adverse effects profile of tramadol versus placebo (risk ratio 2.48; 95% CI 1.55-3.98; overall effect Z= 3.79; P<0.0002) and overall therapeutic effectiveness between tramadol compared to placebo (risk ratio 0.55; 95% CI 0.46-0.67; P<0.00001).
CONCLUSION: On-demand tramadol is an effective treatment for lifelong premature ejaculation. It significantly prolongs the intravaginal ejaculation latency time. The overall adverse events and overall therapeutic effectiveness are significantly greater during treatment with tramadol.
Human ; Female ; Premature Ejaculation ; Ejaculation ; Tramadol ; Paroxetine ; Medline ; Pubmed
7.Comparison of single-dose nalbuphine versus tramadol for postoperative pain management in children: a randomized, controlled trial.
Naeem LIAQAT ; Sajid Hameed DAR
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2017;70(2):184-187
BACKGROUND: Acute postoperative pain control in children is an essential component of postoperative care, particularly in daycare procedures. Giving patients continuous narcotic analgesics can be risky; however, a single dose may be sufficient. METHODS: This study used a prospective, randomized controlled design and was conducted at the Pediatric Surgery Unit, Services Hospital, Lahore. In total, 150 patients who underwent inguinal herniotomy (age range: 1–12 years) were randomly assigned to two groups: group A (nalbuphine) and group B (tramadol). Patients were given a single dose of either nalbuphine (0.2 mg/kg) or tramadol (2 mg/kg) immediately after surgery and pain was measured at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 h. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. The mean pain score was lower in group A than in group B at 0 and 1 h (P < 0.05). However, at 4 h and 8 h, the pain scores in group A were still lower, but not significantly. In all, 9 patients (12.0%) required rescue analgesics in group A compared to 16 patients (21.3%) in group B (P = 0.051). The mean time for requirement of rescue analgesics was 6.5 ± 0.5 h in group A and 5.3 ± 1.7 h in group B (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of nalbuphine is sufficient, and superior to tramadol, for postoperative pain management in children who have undergone daycare procedures.
Analgesics
;
Child*
;
Hernia, Inguinal
;
Humans
;
Nalbuphine*
;
Narcotics
;
Pain, Postoperative*
;
Postoperative Care
;
Prospective Studies
;
Tramadol*
8.Single Shot Epidural Injection for Cervical and Lumbosaccral Radiculopathies: A Preliminary Study.
Digambar Prasad NAWANI ; Sanjay AGRAWAL ; Veena ASTHANA
The Korean Journal of Pain 2010;23(4):254-257
BACKGROUND: Epidural steroid injection is an established treatment modality for intervertebral disc prolapse leading to radiculopathy. In cases where two levels of radiculopathy are present, two separate injections are warranted. Herein, we present our experience of management of such cases with a single epidural injection of local anaesthetic, tramadol and methylprednisolone, and table tilt for management of both radiculopathies. METHODS: 50 patients of either sex aged between 35-65 years presenting with features of cervical and lumbar radiculopathic pain were included and were subjected to single lumbar epidural injection of local anaesthetic, tramadol and methylprednisolone, in the lateral position. The table was then tilted in the trendelberg position with a tilt of 25 degrees, and patients were maintained for 10 minutes before being turned supine. All patients were administered 3 such injections with an interval of 2 weeks between subsequent injections, and pain relief was assessed with a visual analogue scale. Immediate complications after the block were assessed. RESULTS: Immediate and post procedural complications observed were nausea and vomiting (20%), painful injection site (4%), hypotension (10%) and high block (4%). Pain relief was assessed after the three injections by three grades: 37 (74%) had complete resolution of symptoms; 18% had partial relief and 8% did not benefit from the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This technique may be used as an alternative technique for pain relief in patients with unilateral cervical and lumbar radiculopathies.
Aged
;
Humans
;
Hypotension
;
Injections, Epidural
;
Intervertebral Disc
;
Methylprednisolone
;
Nausea
;
Prolapse
;
Radiculopathy
;
Tramadol
;
Vomiting
9.Dependence Potential of Tramadol: Behavioral Pharmacology in Rodents.
Hye Jin CHA ; Min Ji SONG ; Kwang Wook LEE ; Eun Jung KIM ; Young Hoon KIM ; Yunje LEE ; Won Keun SEONG ; Sa Ik HONG ; Choon Gon JANG ; Han Sang YOO ; Ho Sang JEONG
Biomolecules & Therapeutics 2014;22(6):558-562
Tramadol is an opioid analgesic agent that has been the subject of a series of case reports suggesting potential for misuse or abuse. However, it is not a controlled substance and is not generally considered addictive in Korea. In this study, we examined the dependence potential and abuse liability of tramadol as well as its effect on the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems in rodents. In animal behavioral tests, tramadol did not show any positive effects on the experimental animals in climbing, jumping, and head twitch tests. However, in the conditioned place preference and self-administration tests, the experimental animals showed significant positive responses. Taken together, tramadol affected the neurological systems related to abuse liability and has the potential to lead psychological dependence.
Animals
;
Behavior, Animal
;
Head
;
Korea
;
Pharmacology*
;
Rodentia*
;
Substance-Related Disorders
;
Tramadol*
10.The Comparison of the Effects of Ondansetron, Lidocaine, and Tramadol for the Prevention of Pain on Injection of Rocuronium.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2005;48(1):20-23
BACKGROUND: Intravenous injection of rocuronium produces intense discomfort at the site of injection in conscious patients. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intravenous ondansetron, lidocaine, and tramadol for minimizing pain caused by the injection of rocuronium. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned four groups. Before general anesthesia was induced with thiopental sodium (5 mg/kg), manual occlusion (70 mmHg) with tourniquet of venous inflow was performed. The patients were given saline 4 ml (Group 1, n = 30), ondansetron 8 mg (Group 2, n = 30), lidocaine 60 mg (Group 3, n = 30), or tramadol 50 mg (Group 4, n = 30) diluted into a 4 ml solution. The occlusion was released after 20 seconds and rocuronium was injected over 10 15 seconds. The patients were asked immediately if they had pain in the arm, and the response was assessed. The pain response to rocuronium injection was graded with using Memis' 4-point scale. The side effects were recorded for 24 hours after administration of rocuronium. RESULTS: There were no difference among groups in respect of age, weight, and gender (P < 0.05). Lidocaine reduced the incidence of rocuronium injection pain but ondansetron and tramadol did not (P < 0.05). Ondansetron, lidocaine, and tramadol reduced the severity of rocuronium injection pain (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: I conclude that lidocaine is the most effective among these drugs in the prevention of rocuronium injection pain.
Anesthesia, General
;
Arm
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Injections, Intravenous
;
Lidocaine*
;
Ondansetron*
;
Thiopental
;
Tourniquets
;
Tramadol*