In addition to barium swallow, the health screening center of our hospital has started meansuring serum pepsinogen (PG) levels in the stomach cancer screening tests since 1998 if patients wish to receive the PG test. During the past five years, 94 gastric cancer cases were detected by both methods. The average detection ratio worked out at 79.8% for the barium method and 71.3% for the PG method. Of the 94 cases, 51.1% tested positive by both methods. The positivity ratio was 28.7% for the barium method alone and 20.2% for the pepsinogen method alone. In other words, it follows that nearly half of the cancer cases have been picked out by either of the two techniques. Therefore, it could be said that the two methods serve as complementary one to the other. Thus, it was confirmed that using the PG method together with the barium method is worthwhile.The hitting ratio of positive reaction was high in patients at level 2 and upward when checked according to PG levels, and in patients whose initial test results were negative and later shifted to level 2 or level 4 with the lapse of time. These findings suggest that it is feasible to presupposed a group of people at higher risk for developing gastric cancer.
Phosphatidylglycerols ; Pepsinogen A ; Stomach Cancer ; Serum ; Barium

Root resorption can be caused by several factors, including contact with the cortical bone. Here we report a case involving a 21-year-old female with Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusion who exhibited significant root resorption in the maxillary right central incisor after orthodontic treatment. The patient presented with significant left-sided deviation of the maxillary incisors due to lingual dislocation of the left lateral incisor and a Class II molar relationship. Cephalometric analysis demonstrated a Class I skeletal relationship (A pointnasion- B point, 2.5o) and proclined maxillary anterior teeth (upper incisor to sella-nasion plane angle, 113.4o). The primary treatment objectives were the achievement of stable occlusion with midline agreement between the maxillary and mandibular dentitions and appropriate maxillary anterior tooth axes and molar relationship. A panoramic radiograph obtained after active treatment showed significant root resorption in the maxillary right central incisor; therefore, we performed cone-beam computed tomography, which confirmed root resorption along the cortical bone around the incisive canal. The findings from this case, where different degrees of root resorption were observed despite comparable degrees of orthodontic movement in the bilateral maxillary central incisors, suggest that the incisive canal could be an inducing factor for root

For patients with bimaxillary protrusion, significant retraction and intrusion of the anterior teeth are sometimes essential to improve the facial profile. However, severe root resorption of the maxillary incisors occasionally occurs after treatment because of various factors. For instance, it has been reported that approximation or invasion of the incisive canal by the anterior tooth roots during retraction may cause apical root damage. Thus, determination of the position of the maxillary incisors is key for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning in such cases. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) may be useful for simulating the post-treatment position of the maxillary incisors and surrounding structures in order to ensure safe teeth movement. Here, we present a case of Class II malocclusion with bimaxillary protrusion, wherein apical root damage due to treatment was minimized by pretreatment evaluation of the anatomical structures and simulation of the maxillary central incisor movement using CBCT. Considerable retraction and intrusion of the maxillary incisors, which resulted in a significant improvement in the facial profile and smile, were achieved without severe root resorption. Our findings suggest that CBCT-based diagnosis and treatment simulation may facilitate safe and dynamic orthodontic tooth movement, particularly in patients requiring maximum anterior tooth retraction.
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Diagnosis* ; Humans ; Incisor ; Malocclusion ; Root Resorption ; Tooth ; Tooth Movement ; Tooth Root