1.Effect of antiviral prophylaxis on influenza outbreaks in aged care facilities in three local health districts in New South Wales, Australia, 2014
Tony Merritt ; Kirsty Hope ; Michelle Butler ; David Durrheim ; Leena Gupta ; Zeina Najjar ; Stephen Conaty ; Leng Boonwaat ; Stephanie Fletcher
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response 2016;7(1):14-20
BACKGROUND: There was a record number (n = 111) of influenza outbreaks in aged care facilities in New South Wales, Australia during 2014. To determine the impact of antiviral prophylaxis recommendations in practice, influenza outbreak data were compared for facilities in which antiviral prophylaxis and treatment were recommended and for those in which antivirals were recommended for treatment only.
METHODS: Routinely collected outbreak data were extracted from the Notifiable Conditions Information Management System for two Local Health Districts where antiviral prophylaxis was routinely recommended and one Local Health District where antivirals were recommended for treatment but not routinely for prophylaxis. Data collected on residents included counts of influenza-like illness, confirmed influenza, hospitalizations and related deaths. Dates of onset, notification, influenza confirmation and antiviral recommendations were also collected for analysis. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess the significance of differences between group medians for key parameters.
RESULTS: A total of 41 outbreaks (12 in the prophylaxis group and 29 in the treatment-only group) were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in overall outbreak duration; outbreak duration after notification; or attack, hospitalization or case fatality rates between the two groups. The prophylaxis group had significantly higher cases with influenza-like illness (P = 0.03) and cases recommended antiviral treatment per facility (P = 0.01).
DISCUSSION: This study found no significant difference in key outbreak parameters between the two groups. However, further high quality evidence is needed to guide the use of antivirals in responding to influenza outbreaks in aged care facilities.
2.Field exercises are useful for improving public health emergency responses
Eastwood Keith ; Durrheim David ; Merritt Tony ; Massey Peter D ; Huppatz Claire ; Dalton Craig ; Hope Kirsty ; Moran Lucille ; Speare Richard ; Farrar Kris
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response 2010;1(1):12-18
Problem:Emergencies resulting from disease outbreaks and extreme environmental events present significant challenges for health services.
Context: Preparing public health units to effectively manage emergencies is a core activity. Field exercises support consolidation of biopreparedness by testing plans, identifying weaknesses, providing training opportunities and developing surge capacity.
Action: An extended field exercise to test the health response to a novel influenza strain was conducted in northern New South Wales, Australia in September 2008, eight months before the influenza AH1N1 pandemic emerged. Lasting four days and involving over 300 participants, the exercise was set in the early response phase with the staggered presentation of 41 cases to 36 emergency departments in the health area. An additional 150 contacts were written into a complex scenario to test the public health response.
Outcome: The subsequent pandemic emergence in mid-2009 offered a unique opportunity to assess the field exercise format for disaster preparedness. Most roles were adequately tested with recognized benefit during the actual pandemic response. However, the exercise did not adequately challenge the public health planning team that synthesizes surveillance data and forecasts risk, nor did it identify planning issues that became evident during the subsequent pandemic.
Discussion: Field exercises offer the opportunity to rigorously test public health emergency preparedness but can be expensive and labour-intensive. Our exercise provided effective and timely preparation for the 2009 influenza pandemic but showed that more emphasis needs to be placed on the role and training of the public health planning team, an area that may be neglected.
3.Lessons learnt from a three-year pilot field epidemiology training programme
Damian Hoy ; A Mark Durand ; Thane Hancock ; Haley Cash ; Kate Hardie ; Beverley Paterson ; Yvette Paulino ; Paul White ; Tony Merritt ; Dawn Fitzgibbons ; Sameer Vali Gopalani ; James Flint ; Onofre Edwin Merilles Jr ; Mina Kashiwabara ; Viema Biaukula ; Christelle Lepers ; Yvan Souares ; Eric Nilles ; Anaseini Batikawai ; Sevil Huseynova ; Mahomed Patel ; Salanieta Saketa ; David Durrheim ; Alden Henderson ; Adam Roth
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response 2017;8(3):21-26
Problem: The Pacific region has widely dispersed populations, limited financial and human resources and a high burden of disease. There is an urgent need to improve the availability, reliability and timeliness of useable health data.
Context: The purpose of this paper is to share lessons learnt from a three-year pilot field epidemiology training programme that was designed to respond to these Pacific health challenges. The pilot programme built on and further developed an existing field epidemiology training programme for Pacific health staff.
Action: The programme was delivered in country by epidemiologists working for Pacific Public Health Surveillance Network partners. The programme consisted of five courses: four one-week classroom-based courses and one field epidemiology project. Sessions were structured so that theoretical understanding was achieved through interaction and reinforced through practical hands-on group activities, case studies and other interactive practical learning methods.
Outcome: As of September 2016, 258 students had commenced the programme. Twenty-six course workshops were delivered and one cohort of students had completed the full five-course programme. The programme proved popular and gained a high level of student engagement.
Discussion: Face-to-face delivery, a low student-to-facilitator ratio, substantial group work and practical exercises were identified as key factors that contributed to the students developing skills and confidence. Close engagement of leaders and the need to quickly evaluate and adapt the curriculum were important lessons, and the collaboration between external partners was considered important for promoting a harmonized approach to health needs in the Pacific.