Background: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic findings after intra-articular adipose-derived regenerative cell (ADRC) injection as treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: ADRCs were administered to 11 patients (19 knees; mean age, 61.7 years) with knee OA. Subcutaneous adipose tissue was harvested by liposuction from both thighs, and arthroscopic lavage was performed, followed by ADRC injection (mean dose, 1.40 × 10 7 cells) into the synovial fluid. Outcome measures included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm score, and visual analog scale score. Arthroscopic examinations were performed to assess the International Cartilage Repair Society cartilage injury grade preoperatively and overall repair postoperatively. Noninvasive assessments were performed at baseline and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups; arthroscopic assessments were performed at baseline and at 6 months. Results: All outcome measures significantly improved after treatment. This improvement was evident 1 month after treatment and was sustained until the 6-month follow-up. Data from second-look arthroscopy showed better repair in low-grade cartilage lesions than in lesions with a greater degree of damage. No patients demonstrated worsening of Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and none underwent total knee arthroplasty during this period. Conclusions Clinical outcomes were improved in patients with knee OA after ADRC administration. Cartilage regeneration was more effective in smaller damaged lesions than in bigger lesions.

Background: Tibial fracture after cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) is a rare but serious complication. It is reported more frequently in Asian countries. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the morphological characteristics of the tibia by using a simple novel measurement method in patients with tibial fractures after OUKA. Methods: Six knees (all women) with tibial fractures after cementless OUKA (fracture group) and 150 knees without an obvious complication after cementless OUKA (control group) were examined retrospectively at our institution between January 2016 and April 2017. We drew a medial eminence line (ME line) defined as a line extending from the tip of the medial intercondylar eminence parallel to the tibial axis. The ME line was classified into two types (intramedullary type [type I] and extramedullary type [type E]), and the proportion of each type was compared between fracture patients and controls. Results: In the fracture group, there were four (66.7%) type E cases and two (33.3%) type I cases; in the control group, there were 18 (12%) type E cases and 132 (88%) type I cases. Fisher exact tests showed that the proportion of type E was higher in the fracture group than in the control group (p < 0.01). Conclusions Measurement of the ME line can be recommended as a useful method to assess the risk of postoperative fracture after cementless OUKA.

Dynamic X-ray (DXR) is a functional imaging technique that uses sequential images obtained by a flat-panel detector (FPD).This article aims to describe the mechanism of DXR and the analysis methods used as well as review the clinical evidence for its use. DXR analyzes dynamic changes on the basis of X-ray translucency and can be used for analysis of diaphragmatic kinetics, ventilation, and lung perfusion. It offers many advantages such as a high temporal resolution and flexibility in body positioning. Many clinical studies have reported the feasibility of DXR and its characteristic findings in pulmonary diseases. DXR may serve as an alternative to pulmonary function tests in patients requiring contact inhibition, including patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 or other infectious diseases. Thus, DXR has a great potential to play an important role in the clinical setting. Further investigations are needed to utilize DXR more effectively and to establish it as a valuable diagnostic tool.

Dynamic X-ray (DXR) is a functional imaging technique that uses sequential images obtained by a flat-panel detector (FPD).This article aims to describe the mechanism of DXR and the analysis methods used as well as review the clinical evidence for its use. DXR analyzes dynamic changes on the basis of X-ray translucency and can be used for analysis of diaphragmatic kinetics, ventilation, and lung perfusion. It offers many advantages such as a high temporal resolution and flexibility in body positioning. Many clinical studies have reported the feasibility of DXR and its characteristic findings in pulmonary diseases. DXR may serve as an alternative to pulmonary function tests in patients requiring contact inhibition, including patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 or other infectious diseases. Thus, DXR has a great potential to play an important role in the clinical setting. Further investigations are needed to utilize DXR more effectively and to establish it as a valuable diagnostic tool.