Introduction

  The Direction Office of Healthcare Activities (DOHA) started around 1998 in Vietnam offers training provision for all lower- and higher-ranked hospitals. An understanding of the factors responsible for the success of this unique training provision system can be useful in implementing appropriate human resource development strategies in the health sector. Furthermore, the reviews about the changes in the training provision styles can offer us clues on how to connect training provision with visible clinical improvement.

Method

  We reviewed the policy papers from the ministry of health in Vietnam, the activity reports of DOHA in the training center of Bach Mai hospital, which is a high-ranking hospital, JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) reports, and NCGM (National Center For Global Health and Medicine) reports from 1997 to 2015.

Results

  DOHA was founded as a government-led health provision system in Vietnam with strong policy guidelines. However, to expand their activities, strengthen the capacity of training in hospitals, and establish a financial mechanism for training, there was a need to empower lower-ranked hospitals.

  To enhance the training impact of the clinical field in lower-ranked hospitals after training provision, staff of higher-ranked hospitals were dispatched to lower-ranked hospitals to provide on-the-job training (1816 project) and training provision with equipment preparation in lower-level hospitals to overcome environmental difficulties in implementing techniques that they had learned (Satellite hospital project).

Conclusion

  “Strong policy commitments”, “a viable financial system”, and “bottom-up empowerment” were needed to establish nation-wide continuous medical education system in Vietnam. To connect training provision with improvement in the clinical field, “integrated approaches for multiple factors in clinical fields like clinical environment changes and extended follow-ups“ by providing training are needed.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the effects of resistance training (RT) on myocardial infarction (MI) patients in phase II cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in our hospital.
METHODS: Twenty two outpatients who had participated in the phase II CR program more than three months at least were enrolled in this study. They were divided into control group (n＝8) and RT group (n＝14). We examined changes in the exercise capacity of these two groups. The traditional exercise programs which included aerobics and muscle strength exercise were run on the control group. Changes in exercise load for target heart rate measured with a bicycle ergometer as an indicator of exercise capacity were assessed in each patient 1,3 and 5 months after AMI onset.
RESULTS: The amounts of load and target heart rates recorded 1 month after the onset were not significantly different between the two groups. After 3,5 months of CR, the RT group showed no changes in the target heart rate but significant increase of the amount of load. The control group showed no change in the amount of load and target heart rate. In the amount of each load 3 and 5 months after, the RT group was significantly out did the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that RT was useful in the improvement of exercise capacity for patients with MI who participated in the phase II CR program provided by our hospital.