1.Comparison of Continuous Epidural Analgesia, Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Morphine, and Continuous Three-in-One Femoral Nerve Block on Postoperative Outcomes after Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Tomonori TETSUNAGA ; Toru SATO ; Naofumi SHIOTA ; Tomoko TETSUNAGA ; Masahiro YOSHIDA ; Yoshiki OKAZAKI ; Kazuki YAMADA
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2015;7(2):164-170
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain relief can be achieved with various modalities. However, there are only few reports that have analyzed postoperative analgesic techniques in total hip arthroplasty patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the postoperative outcomes of three different analgesic techniques after total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the influence of three analgesic techniques on postoperative rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty in 90 patients divided into three groups (n = 30 patients per group). Postoperative analgesia consisted of continuous epidural analgesia (Epi group), patient-controlled analgesia with morphine (PCA group), or a continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB group). We measured the following parameters relating to postoperative outcome: visual analog scale scores, the use of supplemental analgesia, side effects, length of the hospital stay, plasma D-dimer levels, and the Harris hip score. RESULTS: Each group had low pain scores with no significant differences between the groups. The PCA group had a lower frequency of supplemental analgesia use compared to the Epi and CFNB groups. Side effects (nausea/vomiting, inappetence) and day 7 D-dimer levels were significantly lower in the CFNB group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the length of the hospital stay or the Harris hip score. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no clinically significant differences in outcomes between the three groups, the CFNB provided good pain relief which was equal to that of the other analgesics with fewer side effects and lower D-dimer levels in hospitalized patients following total hip arthroplasty.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
*Analgesia, Epidural/methods
;
*Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
;
Analgesics, Opioid/*administration & dosage
;
*Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
;
Female
;
*Femoral Nerve
;
Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis
;
Humans
;
Length of Stay
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Morphine/*administration & dosage
;
*Nerve Block/methods
;
Pain, Postoperative/*prevention & control
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
2.Long-term Outcomes of One Stage Surgery Using Transanal Colorectal Tube for Acute Colorectal Obstruction of Stage II/III Distal Colon Cancer
Yusuke OKUDA ; Tomonori YAMADA ; Yoshikazu HIRATA ; Takaya SHIMURA ; Ryuzo YAMAGUCHI ; Eiji SAKAMOTO ; Satoshi SOBUE ; Takahiro NAKAZAWA ; Hiromi KATAOKA ; Takashi JOH
Cancer Research and Treatment 2019;51(2):474-482
PURPOSE: Since oncological outcomes of transanal colorectal tube (TCT) placement, an endoscopic treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) with acute colorectal obstruction (ACO), remain unknown, this study analyzed long-term outcomes of TCT placement for stage II/III CRC with ACO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively reviewed from consecutive patients with distal stage II/III CRC who underwent surgery between January 2007 and December 2011 at two Japanese hospitals. One hospital conducted emergency surgery and the other performed TCT placement as the standard treatment for all CRCs with ACO. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to adjust baseline characteristics between two groups. RESULTS: Among 754 patients with distal stage II/III CRC, 680 did not have ACO (non-ACO group) and 74 had ACO (ACO group). The PS matching between both hospitals identified 234 pairs in the non-ACO group and 23 pairs in the ACO group. In the non-ACO group, the surgical quality was equivalent between the two institutions, with no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In the ACO group, the rate of primary resection/anastomosis was higher in the TCT group than in the surgery group (87.0% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were noted between the surgery and the TCT groups in OS (5-year OS, 61.9% vs. 51.5%; p=0.490) and DFS (5-year DFS, 45.9% vs. 38.3%; p=0.658). CONCLUSION: TCT placement can achieve similar long-term outcomes to emergency surgery, with a high rate of primary resection/anastomosis for distal stage II/III colon cancer with ACO.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Colon
;
Colonic Neoplasms
;
Colorectal Neoplasms
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Emergencies
;
Humans
;
Propensity Score
;
Retrospective Studies