1.Effectiveness of annual interventions for smoking cessation in an occupational setting in Japan.
Takashi KADOWAKI ; Tomonori OKAMURA ; Tsutae FUNAKOSHI ; Akira OKAYAMA ; Hideyuki KANDA ; Naomi MIYAMATSU ; Yoshikuni KITA ; Hirotsugu UESHIMA
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 2004;9(4):161-164
OBJECTIVETo examine the effectiveness of a small-scale smoking cessation intervention program conducted annually for ten years in an occupational setting in Japan.
METHODSWe conducted an annual intervention program promoting smoking cessation in male smokers from 1993 to 2002 in an occupational setting in Hyogo, Japan. Trends in smoking prevalence in this worksite were compared with a control group from two similar worksites of the same company. The intervention program was carried out by medical students (the fourth year of a six-year course) who received training on the protocol prior to the intervention. This protocol consisted of one initial group session, followed by periodical correspondence for two months. Successful cessation of smoking was determined by self-declaration of abstinence for longer than four weeks after intervention, confirmed by an expiratory carbon monoxide concentration of less than nine ppm. Smoking prevalence was determined by a self-administered questionnaire provided at the annual health checkup.
RESULTSThe proportion of smokers who participated in the program was 3.47% on average. Abstinence rates following each intervention ranged from 13.3% to 60.0%, with the prevalence of male smokers at the intervention worksite decreasing from 56.2% in 1993 to 47.0% in 2002. In contrast, the smoking prevalence of the control worksites remained largely unchanged, being 60.2% in 1995 and 57.6% in 2002. At the end of the study, the intervention worksite had a significantly lower prevalence of smokers in either the crude or age-adjusted rate.
CONCLUSIONA small-scale but repeated smoking cessation intervention program at a worksite can reduce smoking prevalence more efficiently than the natural trends.
2.Computed Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer: Basics, Advantages, Cautions, and Future Prospects.
Yoshiko R UENO ; Tsutomu TAMADA ; Satoru TAKAHASHI ; Utaru TANAKA ; Keitaro SOFUE ; Tomonori KANDA ; Munenobu NOGAMI ; Yoshiharu OHNO ; Nobuyuki HINATA ; Masato FUJISAWA ; Takamichi MURAKAMI
Korean Journal of Radiology 2018;19(5):832-837
Computed diffusion-weighted MRI is a recently proposed post-processing technique that produces b-value images from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), acquired using at least two different b-values. This article presents an argument for computed DWI for prostate cancer by viewing four aspects of DWI: fundamentals, image quality and diagnostic performance, computing procedures, and future uses.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Prostate*
;
Prostatic Neoplasms*
3.Current Status and Issues of Education on Radiation Health Risk Science
Naoki MATSUDA ; Yoshishige URATA ; Masanobu KITAGAWA ; Masahiko AOKI ; Yoshio HOSOI ; Kenji NEMOTO ; Akira OHTSURU ; Tomonori ISOBE ; Hideyuki SAKURAI ; Kiyoshi MIYAKAWA ; Ryoichi YOSHIMURA ; Reiko KANDA ; Takashi KONDO ; Shunichi TAKEDA ; Takeshi TOUDO ; Kazuo AWAI ; Teruhisa TSUZUKI ; Takeshi NAGAYASU
Medical Education 2019;50(6):581-587
In accordance with the new model-core-curriculum for medical education, the current status of education about the science of radiation health was surveyed in all medical schools in Japan. Among the four learning points related to the “Biological effects of radiation and radiation hazards” , about half of the schools covered issues on “radiation and human body” and the “effect of medical radiation exposure” in one, or less than one, 60-minutes class, but did not touch on “radiation risk communication” and “radiological disaster medicine” . A significant deviation of human resources was also observed between schools. Learning tools such as presentation files and video content were preferred as education support materials. Therefore, development and distribution of the learning tools, especially in “radiation risk communication” and “radiological disaster medicine” , may be a first step to promoting high-quality education on the science of radiation health risk in each school’s curriculum.