1.Usefulness of quantitative proton MR spectroscopy in the differentiation of benign and malignant meningioma.
Qiang YUE ; Tomonori ISOBE ; Yasushi SHIBATA ; Hiraku KAWAMURA ; Izumi ANNO ; Akira MATSUMURA
Journal of Biomedical Engineering 2011;28(6):1103-1109
This study was aimed to explore the value of quantitative proton MR spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in the differentiation of benign and malignant meningioma. 23 cases, including 19 benign (grade I) and 4 malignant (grade II-III) meningiomas, underwent single voxel 1H-MRS (TR/TE = 2000 ms/68, 136, 272 ms). T2 relaxation time of tissue water and choline were estimated by an exponential decay model. Choline concentration was calculated using tissue water as the internal reference, and corrected according to intra-voxel cystic/necrotic parts. Tissue water T2 of benign and malignant meningiomas were (105 +/- 41) ms and (151 +/- 42) ms, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.033). While Choline T2 of benign and malignant meningiomas were (242 +/- 73) ms and (316 +/- 102) ms respectively, the difference was not significant (P = 0.105). Choline concentration was (2.86 +/- 0.86) mmol/ kg wet weight in benign meningiomas and (3.53 +/- 0.60) mmol/kg wet weight in malignant ones; after correction they increased to (2.98 +/- 0.93)mmol/kg wet weight and (4.58 +/- 1.22) mmol/kg wet weight, respectively, and the difference was significant (P = 0.019). In conclusion, quantitative 1H-MRS is useful for the differentiation of benign and malignant meningioma by T2 relaxation time and absolute choline concentration.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Choline
;
metabolism
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
;
methods
;
Male
;
Meningeal Neoplasms
;
diagnosis
;
metabolism
;
pathology
;
Meningioma
;
diagnosis
;
metabolism
;
pathology
;
Middle Aged
;
Protons
;
Young Adult
2.Muscle Quality as a Potential Diagnostic Marker of Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Natsumi OSHIDA ; Sechang OH ; Bokun KIM ; Ikuru MIURA ; Naoyuki HASEGAWA ; Shoichi KOMINE ; Tomonori ISOBE ; Junichi SHODA
Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome 2024;33(2):143-154
Background:
Muscle–liver crosstalk plays an important role in the development and progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The measurement of muscle echo-intensity during ultrasonography is a realtime, non-invasive method of assessing muscle quality. In this retrospective study, we investigated the significance of poor muscle quality (namely, a greater mass of non-contractile tissue, including intramuscular fat) as a risk factor for advanced liver fibrosis and considered whether it may represent a useful tool for the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis.
Methods:
We analyzed data from 307 patients with NAFLD (143 men and 164 women) who visited the University of Tsukuba Hospital between 2017 and 2022. The patients were stratified into the following tertiles of muscle quality according to their muscle echo-intensity on ultrasonography: modest (84.1 arbitrary units [A.U.]), intermediate (97.4 A.U.), and poor (113.6 A.U.). We then investigated the relationships between muscle quality and risk factors for advanced liver fibrosis and calculated appropriate cutoff values.
Results:
Patients with poor muscle quality showed a significant, 7.6-fold greater risk of liver fibrosis compared to those with modest muscle quality. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that muscle quality assessment was as accurate as the fibrosis-4 index and NAFLD fibrosis score in screening for liver fibrosis and superior to the assessment of muscle quantity and strength, respectively. Importantly, a muscle echo-intensity of ≥92.4 A.U. may represent a useful marker of advanced liver fibrosis.
Conclusion
Muscle quality may represent a useful means of identifying advanced liver fibrosis, and its assessment may become a useful screening tool in daily practice.
3.Muscle Quality as a Potential Diagnostic Marker of Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Natsumi OSHIDA ; Sechang OH ; Bokun KIM ; Ikuru MIURA ; Naoyuki HASEGAWA ; Shoichi KOMINE ; Tomonori ISOBE ; Junichi SHODA
Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome 2024;33(2):143-154
Background:
Muscle–liver crosstalk plays an important role in the development and progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The measurement of muscle echo-intensity during ultrasonography is a realtime, non-invasive method of assessing muscle quality. In this retrospective study, we investigated the significance of poor muscle quality (namely, a greater mass of non-contractile tissue, including intramuscular fat) as a risk factor for advanced liver fibrosis and considered whether it may represent a useful tool for the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis.
Methods:
We analyzed data from 307 patients with NAFLD (143 men and 164 women) who visited the University of Tsukuba Hospital between 2017 and 2022. The patients were stratified into the following tertiles of muscle quality according to their muscle echo-intensity on ultrasonography: modest (84.1 arbitrary units [A.U.]), intermediate (97.4 A.U.), and poor (113.6 A.U.). We then investigated the relationships between muscle quality and risk factors for advanced liver fibrosis and calculated appropriate cutoff values.
Results:
Patients with poor muscle quality showed a significant, 7.6-fold greater risk of liver fibrosis compared to those with modest muscle quality. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that muscle quality assessment was as accurate as the fibrosis-4 index and NAFLD fibrosis score in screening for liver fibrosis and superior to the assessment of muscle quantity and strength, respectively. Importantly, a muscle echo-intensity of ≥92.4 A.U. may represent a useful marker of advanced liver fibrosis.
Conclusion
Muscle quality may represent a useful means of identifying advanced liver fibrosis, and its assessment may become a useful screening tool in daily practice.
4.Muscle Quality as a Potential Diagnostic Marker of Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Natsumi OSHIDA ; Sechang OH ; Bokun KIM ; Ikuru MIURA ; Naoyuki HASEGAWA ; Shoichi KOMINE ; Tomonori ISOBE ; Junichi SHODA
Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome 2024;33(2):143-154
Background:
Muscle–liver crosstalk plays an important role in the development and progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The measurement of muscle echo-intensity during ultrasonography is a realtime, non-invasive method of assessing muscle quality. In this retrospective study, we investigated the significance of poor muscle quality (namely, a greater mass of non-contractile tissue, including intramuscular fat) as a risk factor for advanced liver fibrosis and considered whether it may represent a useful tool for the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis.
Methods:
We analyzed data from 307 patients with NAFLD (143 men and 164 women) who visited the University of Tsukuba Hospital between 2017 and 2022. The patients were stratified into the following tertiles of muscle quality according to their muscle echo-intensity on ultrasonography: modest (84.1 arbitrary units [A.U.]), intermediate (97.4 A.U.), and poor (113.6 A.U.). We then investigated the relationships between muscle quality and risk factors for advanced liver fibrosis and calculated appropriate cutoff values.
Results:
Patients with poor muscle quality showed a significant, 7.6-fold greater risk of liver fibrosis compared to those with modest muscle quality. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that muscle quality assessment was as accurate as the fibrosis-4 index and NAFLD fibrosis score in screening for liver fibrosis and superior to the assessment of muscle quantity and strength, respectively. Importantly, a muscle echo-intensity of ≥92.4 A.U. may represent a useful marker of advanced liver fibrosis.
Conclusion
Muscle quality may represent a useful means of identifying advanced liver fibrosis, and its assessment may become a useful screening tool in daily practice.
5.Current Status and Issues of Education on Radiation Health Risk Science
Naoki MATSUDA ; Yoshishige URATA ; Masanobu KITAGAWA ; Masahiko AOKI ; Yoshio HOSOI ; Kenji NEMOTO ; Akira OHTSURU ; Tomonori ISOBE ; Hideyuki SAKURAI ; Kiyoshi MIYAKAWA ; Ryoichi YOSHIMURA ; Reiko KANDA ; Takashi KONDO ; Shunichi TAKEDA ; Takeshi TOUDO ; Kazuo AWAI ; Teruhisa TSUZUKI ; Takeshi NAGAYASU
Medical Education 2019;50(6):581-587
In accordance with the new model-core-curriculum for medical education, the current status of education about the science of radiation health was surveyed in all medical schools in Japan. Among the four learning points related to the “Biological effects of radiation and radiation hazards” , about half of the schools covered issues on “radiation and human body” and the “effect of medical radiation exposure” in one, or less than one, 60-minutes class, but did not touch on “radiation risk communication” and “radiological disaster medicine” . A significant deviation of human resources was also observed between schools. Learning tools such as presentation files and video content were preferred as education support materials. Therefore, development and distribution of the learning tools, especially in “radiation risk communication” and “radiological disaster medicine” , may be a first step to promoting high-quality education on the science of radiation health risk in each school’s curriculum.