1.A Multi-Perspective Framework of Vision Zero: Toward Collaborative Promotion of Safety, Health and Well-Being at Work
Tommi ALANKO ; Riikka RUOTSALA
Safety and Health at Work 2022;13(3):372-375
In the globalized field of safety, health, and well-being, the need to build multi-stakeholder alliances to find solutions to complex challenges is growing. This requires common ground for collaboration, as well as concepts and tools to grasp and manage the areas of interest. Over recent years, Vision Zero has awakened interest and it continues to evolve into many forms of approaches and initiatives, which provide a strategic direction and practical tools for supporting the development of safety, health, and well-being at work. Consequently, there is a need to build a shared understanding of ‘zero’. This article reflects the potential of Vision Zero as a bridging concept and an approach for building multi-stakeholder collaboration. Thus, we present a multi-perspective framework of Vision Zero to support further dialoge and collaboration in joint undertakings.
2.Testing of Common Electromagnetic Environments for Risk of Interference with Cardiac Pacemaker Function.
Maria TIIKKAJA ; Aapo L ARO ; Tommi ALANKO ; Harri LINDHOLM ; Heli SISTONEN ; Juha E K HARTIKAINEN ; Lauri TOIVONEN ; Jukka JUUTILAINEN ; Maila HIETANEN
Safety and Health at Work 2013;4(3):156-159
BACKGROUND: Cardiac pacemakers are known to be susceptible to strong electromagnetic fields (EMFs). This in vivo study investigated occurrence of electromagnetic interference with pacemakers caused by common environmental sources of EMFs. METHODS: Eleven volunteers with a pacemaker were exposed to EMFs produced by two mobile phone base stations, an electrically powered commuter train, and an overhead high voltage transmission lines. All the pacemakers were programmed in normal clinically selected settings with bipolar sensing and pacing configurations. RESULTS: None of the pacemakers experienced interference in any of these exposure situations. However, often it is not clear whether or not strong EMFs exist in various work environments, and hence an individual risk assessment is needed. CONCLUSIONS: Modern pacemakers are well shielded against external EMFs, and workers with a pacemaker can most often return to their previous work after having a pacemaker implanted. However, an appropriate risk assessment is still necessary after the implantation of a pacemaker, a change of its generator, or major modification of its programming settings.
Cellular Phone
;
Electromagnetic Fields
;
Magnets*
;
Occupational Exposure
;
Risk Assessment