1.IgG4-Associated Cholangitis Can Mimic Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.
Victor M ZAYDFUDIM ; Andrew Y WANG ; Eduard E DE LANGE ; Zimin ZHAO ; Christopher A MOSKALUK ; Todd W BAUER ; Reid B ADAMS
Gut and Liver 2015;9(4):556-560
IgG4-associated cholangitis can mimic hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Previously reported patients with IgG4-associated cholangitis mimicking cholangiocarcinoma had elevated serum IgG4 levels and long-segment biliary strictures. However, in the absence of other diagnostic criteria for malignancy, IgG4-associated cholangitis should remain a consideration among patients with normal serum IgG4 and a hilar mass suspicious for cholangiocarcinoma. The presence of a hilar mass and a malignant-appearing biliary stricture in two patients with normal serum IgG4 prompted further evaluation and subsequent concomitant liver and bile duct resection and reconstruction. The diagnosis of IgG4-associated cholangitis was established during the pathologic evaluation of the resected specimens. IgG4-associated cholangitis is a known imitator of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and should be considered in the differential diagnosis even among serologically IgG4-negative patients with a hilar mass prior to operative resection.
Aged
;
Bile Ducts/pathology/surgery
;
Cholangitis/blood/*diagnosis
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Humans
;
Immunoglobulin G/*blood
;
Klatskin Tumor/blood/*diagnosis
;
Liver/pathology/surgery
;
Male
2.Comparative accuracy of four guidelines to predict high-grade dysplasia or malignancy in surgically resected pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms:Small nuances between guidelines lead to vastly different results
Irene C. PEREZ ; Andrew BIGELOW ; Vanessa M. SHAMI ; Bryan G. SAUER ; Andrew Y. WANG ; Daniel S. STRAND ; Alexander J. PODBOY ; Todd W. BAUER ; Victor M. ZAYDFUDIM ; Allan TSUNG ; Ross C. D. BUERLEIN
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2024;28(4):483-493
Background:
s/Aims: The guidelines regarding the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) all have slightly different surgical indications for high-risk lesions. We aim to retrospectively compare the accuracy of four guidelines in recommending surgery for high-risk IPMNs, and assess the accuracy of elevated CA-19-9 levels and imaging characteristics of IPMNs considered high-risk in predicting malignancy or high-grade dysplasia (HGD).
Methods:
The final histopathological diagnosis of surgically resected high-risk IPMNs during 2013−2020 were compared to preoperative surgical indications, as enumerated in four guidelines: the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), 2017 International Consensus, 2018 European Study Group, and 2018 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG). Surgery was considered “justified” if histopathology of the surgical specimen showed HGD/malignancy, or there was postoperative symptomatic improvement.
Results:
Surgery was postoperatively justified in 26/65 (40.0%) cases. All IPMNs with HGD/malignancy were detected by the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines. The combined (“high-risk stigmata” and “worrisome features”) 2017 International guideline missed 1/19 (5.3%) IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. The 2015 AGA guideline missed the most cases (11/19, 57.9%) of IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. We found the features most-associated with HGD/malignancy were pancreatic ductal dilation, and elevated CA-19-9 levels.
Conclusions
Following the 2015 AGA guideline results in the highest rate of missed HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rate of operating on IPMNs without these features; meanwhile, the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines result in more operations for IPMNs without HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rates of missed HGD/malignancy in IPMNs.
3.Comparative accuracy of four guidelines to predict high-grade dysplasia or malignancy in surgically resected pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms:Small nuances between guidelines lead to vastly different results
Irene C. PEREZ ; Andrew BIGELOW ; Vanessa M. SHAMI ; Bryan G. SAUER ; Andrew Y. WANG ; Daniel S. STRAND ; Alexander J. PODBOY ; Todd W. BAUER ; Victor M. ZAYDFUDIM ; Allan TSUNG ; Ross C. D. BUERLEIN
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2024;28(4):483-493
Background:
s/Aims: The guidelines regarding the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) all have slightly different surgical indications for high-risk lesions. We aim to retrospectively compare the accuracy of four guidelines in recommending surgery for high-risk IPMNs, and assess the accuracy of elevated CA-19-9 levels and imaging characteristics of IPMNs considered high-risk in predicting malignancy or high-grade dysplasia (HGD).
Methods:
The final histopathological diagnosis of surgically resected high-risk IPMNs during 2013−2020 were compared to preoperative surgical indications, as enumerated in four guidelines: the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), 2017 International Consensus, 2018 European Study Group, and 2018 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG). Surgery was considered “justified” if histopathology of the surgical specimen showed HGD/malignancy, or there was postoperative symptomatic improvement.
Results:
Surgery was postoperatively justified in 26/65 (40.0%) cases. All IPMNs with HGD/malignancy were detected by the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines. The combined (“high-risk stigmata” and “worrisome features”) 2017 International guideline missed 1/19 (5.3%) IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. The 2015 AGA guideline missed the most cases (11/19, 57.9%) of IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. We found the features most-associated with HGD/malignancy were pancreatic ductal dilation, and elevated CA-19-9 levels.
Conclusions
Following the 2015 AGA guideline results in the highest rate of missed HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rate of operating on IPMNs without these features; meanwhile, the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines result in more operations for IPMNs without HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rates of missed HGD/malignancy in IPMNs.
4.Comparative accuracy of four guidelines to predict high-grade dysplasia or malignancy in surgically resected pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms:Small nuances between guidelines lead to vastly different results
Irene C. PEREZ ; Andrew BIGELOW ; Vanessa M. SHAMI ; Bryan G. SAUER ; Andrew Y. WANG ; Daniel S. STRAND ; Alexander J. PODBOY ; Todd W. BAUER ; Victor M. ZAYDFUDIM ; Allan TSUNG ; Ross C. D. BUERLEIN
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2024;28(4):483-493
Background:
s/Aims: The guidelines regarding the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) all have slightly different surgical indications for high-risk lesions. We aim to retrospectively compare the accuracy of four guidelines in recommending surgery for high-risk IPMNs, and assess the accuracy of elevated CA-19-9 levels and imaging characteristics of IPMNs considered high-risk in predicting malignancy or high-grade dysplasia (HGD).
Methods:
The final histopathological diagnosis of surgically resected high-risk IPMNs during 2013−2020 were compared to preoperative surgical indications, as enumerated in four guidelines: the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), 2017 International Consensus, 2018 European Study Group, and 2018 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG). Surgery was considered “justified” if histopathology of the surgical specimen showed HGD/malignancy, or there was postoperative symptomatic improvement.
Results:
Surgery was postoperatively justified in 26/65 (40.0%) cases. All IPMNs with HGD/malignancy were detected by the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines. The combined (“high-risk stigmata” and “worrisome features”) 2017 International guideline missed 1/19 (5.3%) IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. The 2015 AGA guideline missed the most cases (11/19, 57.9%) of IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. We found the features most-associated with HGD/malignancy were pancreatic ductal dilation, and elevated CA-19-9 levels.
Conclusions
Following the 2015 AGA guideline results in the highest rate of missed HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rate of operating on IPMNs without these features; meanwhile, the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines result in more operations for IPMNs without HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rates of missed HGD/malignancy in IPMNs.