1.Application of formative assessment in basic life support education and its reflection
Qi LI ; Jing LIN ; Hong XIAO ; Erli MA ; Peng LIANG ; Tingwei SHI ; Liqun FANG ; Chaozhi LUO ; Jin LIU
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 2013;(11):1088-1091
Objective To investigate the effect of formative assessment on skill acquisition of basic life support (BLS) among medical students. Methods Totally 206 undergraduates were ran-domized into control group (C group) and interventional group (F group). A BLS lecture was given in both groups. And then, 45 min BLS training and BLS skill assessment (after training) were given in C group. Undergraduates in F group received BLS skill assessment (formative assessment) before training, and 15 min feedback was delivered based on the assessment, then 30 min BLS training was conducted. Skills assessment was conducted again in F group after the training. Student's-t-test was used to compare the difference of skills between the two groups and P<0.05 signifies statistically sig-nificant differences. Results Score of F group (85.2±7.3) were higher than that in C group (68.2± 13.2), with statistical difference. Conclusion A formative assessment could significantly improve skill acquisition of BLS among medical students.
2.Study on the current status and influencing factors of medical staff′s cognition and attitude towards clinical research ethics
Na ZHANG ; Tingwei LUO ; Hongwen QIN ; Lihui ZHU ; Zhiqiang ZHANG ; Sishan JIANG ; Qingqing XIA ; Yuqiong XIANG
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management 2023;36(5):369-376
Objective:To understand the cognition and attitude of medical staff towards medical ethics review, analyze possible influencing factors, to put forward relevant suggestions for strengthening ethical management in the future.Methods:From November 2021 to May 2022, a self-designed questionnaire and general data questionnaire on the cognition and attitude of medical staff to ethical issues in clinical research were used to investigate 408 medical staff from two first-class ternary hospitals in Hunan Province, data was analyzed to explore the respondents′ cognition and attitude, as well as related influence factors.Results:The average cognitive score of medical staff was 65.41, and the average attitude score was 91.83. Many possible influence actors regarding the cognition were identified, including degree, technical title, professional field, number of clinical research projects engaged as investigators, number of clinical research projects conducted as principle investigators, whether the hospital has established an ethics committee, and research ethics training experiences. While the influence factors of attitude were experiences of conducting and engaging in clinical research, the construction of hospital ethics committee and research ethics trainings.Conclusions:Medical staffs have the willingness to explore more research ethics knowledge, while their cognition of research ethics should be improved. Root-cause analysis should be conducted to identify influencing factors for improvement. The research management department should strengthen the publicity and training of clinical research ethics of medical staff, to improve their clinical research ethics knowledge literacy, and ensure the well-functioning of clinical research ethics review.