1.Measuring Gastrointestinal Electrical Activity With Extracellular Electrodes.
Gregory O'GRADY ; Timothy R ANGELI ; Peng DU ; Leo K CHENG
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2015;21(4):623-624
No abstract available.
Electrodes*
2.Relationship Between Intestinal Slow-waves, Spike-bursts, and Motility, as Defined Through High-resolution Electrical and Video Mapping
Sachira KURUPPU ; Leo K CHENG ; Recep AVCI ; Timothy R ANGELI-GORDON ; Nira PASKARANANDAVADIVEL
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2022;28(4):664-677
Background/Aims:
High-resolution extracellular mapping has improved our understanding of bioelectric slow-wave and spike-burst activity in the small intestine. The spatiotemporal correlation of electrophysiology and motility patterns is of critical interest to intestinal function but remains incompletely defined.
Methods:
Intestinal jejunum segments from in vivo pigs and rabbits were exteriorized, and simultaneous high-resolution extracellular recordings and video recordings were performed. Contractions were quantified with strain fields, and the frequencies and velocities of motility patterns were calculated. The amplitudes, frequencies, and velocities of slow-wave propagation patterns and spike-bursts were quantified and visualized. In addition, the duration, size and energy of spike-burst patches were quantified.
Results:
Slow-wave associated spike-bursts activated periodically at 10.8 ± 4.0 cycles per minute (cpm) in pigs and 10.2 ± 3.2 cpm in rabbits, while independent spike-bursts activated at a frequency of 3.2 ± 1.8 cpm. Independent spike-bursts had higher amplitude and longer duration than slow-wave associated spike-bursts (1.4 ± 0.8 mV vs 0.1 ± 0.1 mV, P < 0.001; 1.8 ± 1.4 seconds vs 0.8 ± 0.3 seconds, P < 0.001 in pigs). Spike-bursts that activated as longitudinal or circumferential patches were associated with contractions in the respective directions. Spontaneous peristaltic contractions were elicited by independent spike-bursts and travelled slower than slow-wave velocity (3.7 ± 0.5 mm/sec vs 10.1 ± 4.7 mm/sec, P = 0.007). Cyclic peristaltic contractions were driven by slow-wave associated spike-bursts and were coupled to slow-wave velocity and frequency in rabbit (14.2 ± 2.3 mm/sec vs 11.5 ± 4.6 mm/sec,P = 0.162; 11.0 ± 0.6 cpm vs 10.8 ± 0.6 cpm, P= 0.970).
Conclusions
Motility patterns were dictated by patterns of spike-burst patches. When spike-bursts were coupled to slow-waves, periodic motility patterns were observed, while when spike-bursts were not coupled to slow-waves, spontaneous aperiodic motility patterns were captured.
3.Experimental and Automated Analysis Techniques for High-resolution Electrical Mapping of Small Intestine Slow Wave Activity.
Timothy R ANGELI ; Gregory O'GRADY ; Niranchan PASKARANANDAVADIVEL ; Jonathan C ERICKSON ; Peng DU ; Andrew J PULLAN ; Ian P BISSETT ; Leo K CHENG
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2013;19(2):179-191
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Small intestine motility is governed by an electrical slow wave activity, and abnormal slow wave events have been associated with intestinal dysmotility. High-resolution (HR) techniques are necessary to analyze slow wave propagation, but progress has been limited by few available electrode options and laborious manual analysis. This study presents novel methods for in vivo HR mapping of small intestine slow wave activity. METHODS: Recordings were obtained from along the porcine small intestine using flexible printed circuit board arrays (256 electrodes; 4 mm spacing). Filtering options were compared, and analysis was automated through adaptations of the falling-edge variable-threshold (FEVT) algorithm and graphical visualization tools. RESULTS: A Savitzky-Golay filter was chosen with polynomial-order 9 and window size 1.7 seconds, which maintained 94% of slow wave amplitude, 57% of gradient and achieved a noise correction ratio of 0.083. Optimized FEVT parameters achieved 87% sensitivity and 90% positive-predictive value. Automated activation mapping and animation successfully revealed slow wave propagation patterns, and frequency, velocity, and amplitude were calculated and compared at 5 locations along the intestine (16.4 +/- 0.3 cpm, 13.4 +/- 1.7 mm/sec, and 43 +/- 6 microV, respectively, in the proximal jejunum). CONCLUSIONS: The methods developed and validated here will greatly assist small intestine HR mapping, and will enable experimental and translational work to evaluate small intestine motility in health and disease.
Electrodes
;
Electrophysiology
;
Forced Expiratory Volume
;
Gastrointestinal Motility
;
Interstitial Cells of Cajal
;
Intestine, Small
;
Intestines
;
Noise