Objective To compare the effectiveness of expandable intramedullary nail(EIMN) versus locked compression plate (LCP) in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures of AO types A and B.Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed and compared of the 44 humeral shaft fractures which had been treated between May 2012 and February 2016.There were 26 men and 18 women,from 23 to 66 years of age (average,41.5 years).By AO classification,22 cases were type 12-A and 22 type 12-B.EINM was used in 22 patients with an average age of 41.3 ± 1 1.7 years and LCP in 22 ones with an average age of 41.6 ± 10.3 years.The 2 groups were compared in terms of intraoperative blood loss,operative time,hospital stay,union time,union rate,Constant and Mayo scores at the final follow-ups,and complications as well.Results The 2 groups were compatible without significant differences in the preoperative demographic data (P ＞ 0.05).All the 44 patients were followed up for 10 to 18 months (average,12 months).The intraoperative blood loss (76.4 ± 18.66 mL),operative time (69.1 ± 13.2 min),incision length (5.8 ± 1.5 cm) and union time (13.2 ± 8.4 w) in the EIMN group were significantly better than those in the LCP group (138.6 ± 39.4 mL,96.4 ± 14.2 min,8.5 ± 1.4 cm and 18.4 ± 6.6 w,respectively) (P ＜ 0.05).There was also a significant difference between the 2 groups in the total complication rate[18.2％ (4/22) versus 50.0％ (11/22)] (P ＜0.05).No deep infection or should pain was observed in either group.Conclusions Inthe treatment of humeral shaft fractures of AO types 42-A and 42-B,compared with LCP,EIMN may have advantages of less intraoperative blood loss,operative time,union time and complications.The 2 methods are similar in hospital stay and final functional recovery of the should joint.

Objective To compare the function recovery of multiple injuries combined with floating knee joint injury and simple knee joint injury,and to analyze the risk factors.Methods A retrospective case control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 41 patients with multiple injuries combined with Blake and McBryde Ⅱ A floating knee injury admitted to Xijing Hospital of Air Force Medical University from June 2011 to June 2017.There were 26 males and 15 females,aged 18-76 years,with an average of 34.5 years.There were 25 patients with simple knee joint injury and and 16 patients with multi-joint combined injury involving knee joint and ipsilateral hip joint or ankle joint injury.Surgical fixation was performed in different parts by external fixation,intramedullary nail and plate screw fixation.According to the Kalstr(o)m and Olerud functional evaluation criteria,the excellent and good rate of postoperative functional recovery was compared between the two groups.The surgical fixation methods of the two groups were compared.Logistic regression analysis was performed on the influencing factors of functional recovery.Results The patients were followed up for 1-7 years,with an average of 3 years.The excellent and good rate of overall functional recovery in the two groups was 68％,and the rate was 84％ in simple knee injury group and 44％ in multi-joint combined injury group (P ＜ 0.01).There was no significant difference in the ratio of intramedullary nail and plate screw fixation between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05),while the proportion of the external fixation in the multi-joint combined injury group [31％ (5/16)] was significantly higher than that in the simple knee joint injury group [16％ (4/25)] (P ＜ 0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that the rate of external fixation was an independent factor affecting the postoperative function (OR =0.15,P ＜ 0.01).Conclusions The postoperative function in multi-joint injury patients is poorer than in the single joint injury patients.The higher rate of using external fixation in multi-joint injury patients is a risk factor.For Blake and McBryde Ⅱ A floating knee injury combined with multi-joint injury,less external fixation should be used,so as to improve the postoperative function.