Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of endoscopy,TEM,and transanal local resection in rectal adenomatous polyps.Methods Data of 195 patients with rectal adenomatous polypus,who underwent either endoscopic resection (EMR,ESD and conventional endoscopic resection,n =65),TEM (n =65) or transanal local resection (n =65) in the past two years (2009-2011) were retrospectively collected and analyzed.Results Distance from lesion to anus in endoscopic group was significantly longer than that in transanal group (P ＜ 0.05).Bleeding volume during the procedure in transanal group was significantly larger than that in endoscopic group (P ＜ 0.05).The operation time and hospitalization time in endoscopic group were significantly shorter than those in TEM group and transanal group (P ＜ 0.01).The total cost in endoscopic group was significantly lower than that in other 2 groups (P ＜ 0.01).Conclusion Endoscopic resection is a safe and effective therapy for rectal adenomatous polypus.

Objective To investigate the significance of homocysteine (Hcy) in pathogenesis of coronary heart disease (CHD) and the relationship among serum homocysteine , age, type of CHD and the branches of coronary arteriopathy. Methods In a cross sectional test, serum Hcy levels of 166 old cases (age≥60 years) and 161 non old cases(age

Objective To investigate the effect of improving immunity in the treatment of chronic brucellosis,and to analyze and evaluate its clinical curative effect.Methods A patient with chronic brucellosis was treated with Mongolian medicine combined with chemical drugs to enhance immunity.The clinical symptoms,serological antibodies,Brucella DNA and immune function were compared before and after treatment.The specific antibody against Brucella in serum was detected by tube agglutination test (SAT) and tiger red plate agglutination test (RBPT).Brucella DNA in serum and blood cells was detected by PCR,and the peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were detected by flow cytometry.Immuno-luminescence technique was used to detect serum immunoglobulin and complement components.Results After treatment,the clinical symptoms such as cold back,fatigue,and joint pain disappeared completely,and the results of serum specific antibodies against Brucella were SAT 1 ∶ 50 (++)and RBPT (+) with no changes before and after treatment,and the results of cells and serum were both negative after treatment though the results of DNA detection of Brucella were cell positive and seronegative before treatment.The results of immunological function test showed that γδT cells decreased to 9.50％ after treatment compared to 14.00％ before treatment,and the percentage of monocytes and Treg cells were 5.59％ and 7.33％ after treatment,which were higher than 3.35％ and 4.72％ of before treatment,and the level of complement C3 was 0.79 g/L before treatment and 0.91 g/L after treatment that was returned to normal reference range (0.88 ～ 2.01 g/L).Conclusion The patients with chronic brucellosis can improve their clinical treatment by improving immunity.

Objective To investigate the resection of chest wall tumor and the reconstruction of it.Methods Retrospectively summarize the diagnosis and treatment of 91 cases of chest wall tumors in our hospital from January 2008 to November 2017.There are 55 males and 36 females and the ages ranged from 7 to 78 years,with a median age of 43 years.82 cases were operated for the first time,and 9 cases were reoperated.The postoperative pathology showed that the benign were 52 cases and malignant were 39 cases.The largest benign tumor was 15 cm × 10 cm × 3 cm and the largest malignant tumor was 30 cm × 20 cm × 15 cm.Local excision was performed in 66 cases and extended resection in 25 cases.After the resection,ilium,titanium mesh,Dacron mesh and Matrix reconstruction system were selected for reconstruction of chest wall respectivly.Results All the operation was successful and without death.Local resection was performed in all of benign tumor and in 15 cases of malignant tumor,extended resection was performed in the other 24 malignant tumor cases.After the local resection,the soft tissue was sutured directly to reconstruct the chest wall.The enlarged resection of the bone was performed by reconstructing the bony chest with different materials.In the soft tissue reconstruction,1 cases were treated with myocutaneous flap,and the other 23 cases were sutured directly.Postoperative chest wall integrity is stable,no chest wall floating and abnormal breathing.1 patients received ventilator supportion,and 2 patients had wound infection.The chest wall defect caused by benign tumor has good quality of life,no recurrence.After resection of the malignant tumor of the chest wall,2 died,and the rest were still alive.Conclusion Local resection is the main therapeutic method of benign chest wall tumor,and malignant chest wall tumor is mostly enlarged excision.Bone remodeling after extended resection plays an important role in the reconstruction of chest wall.It is necessary to select appropriate materials for reconstruction.Matrix titanium sternal or rib reconstruction system fixed reliably and the follow-up in a short term were also satisfactory.

Objective:To evaluate the intelligent performance measurement system for colonoscopy.Methods:Nine endoscopists from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were randomly assigned to the quality control group and the control group based on inclusion and exclusion criteria by the random number table. In the pre-quality-control stage (from April 20, 2019 to May 30, 2019), colonoscopic data acquired by the enrolled endoscopists were collected. In the training stage (June 1-30, 2019), the quality control group was trained on the quality control knowledge and the use of intelligent gastrointestinal endoscopy performance measurement system; but the control group was only trained on the quality control knowledge.In the post-quality-control stage (from July 1, 2019 to August 20, 2019), a weekly quality feedback was given to endoscopists of the quality control group, while the endoscopists of the control group had no quality control report.Then, the colonoscopic data acquired by enrolled endoscopists were prospectively collected during the period. The primary endpoint was adenoma detection rate. The secondary endpoints were withdrawal time, polyp detection rate and cecal intubation rate.Results:Four endoscopists were assigned to the quality control group and five to the control group. A total of 1 471 colonoscopic procedures were analyzed. The detection rates of adenoma and polyp in the quality control group increased with feedbacks[13.7% (45/329) VS 7.1% (24/338), χ2=55.796, P<0.001; 48.9% (161/329) VS 40.2% (136/338), χ2=4.071, P=0.044], while there were no significant differences in the control group [9.3% (37/398) VS 9.1% (37/406), χ2=0.329, P=0.566; 33.9% (135/398) VS 33.0% (134/496), χ2=3.616, P=0.057]. The withdrawal time in the quality control group increased with feedbacks[5.9 (3.9, 7.3) min VS 4.1 (2.8, 6.1) min, Z=6.965, P<0.001], while there was no significant difference in this variable in the control group [3.9 (2.7, 6.1) min VS 3.6 (2.6, 5.8) min, Z=1.355, P=0.175]. Conclusion:The intelligent performance measurement system for gastrointestinal endoscopy with feedbacks can monitor and improve the colonoscopic quality.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most appropriate form of selective neck dissection(SND) in the hypopharyngeal cancer with cervical lymph node metastasis. METHOD: We have retrospectively analyzed the distribution and prevalence of cervical metastasis in 26 patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma from January 1998 to December 2008. All the patients underwent SND as part of the primary treatment. There were 34 elective SNDs and 17 therapeutic SNDs from 11 node-negative hypopharyngeal cancers and others node-positive. RESULT: Occult metastasis was found in 6 patients (55%) with cervical metastasis confined to level II and III. Clinical node-positive necks were all pathologically identified with 6.7%, 66.7%, 86.7%, 46.7%, and 20.0% of the prevalence of metastasis to level I, II, III, IV and V respectively. The regional recurrences were found in 4 patients during the follow-up, which were all from cN+ patients. No patient experienced level I recurrence. CONCLUSION The results of this study suggest that SND (I-III) may be feasible for the treatment of cN0 hypopharyngeal cancer, which needs a larger sample to verify. Meanwhile, from our data, it has a satisfactory result to perform SND (II-V) with adjuvant radiotherapy for the cN+ patients.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; pathology ; surgery ; Head and Neck Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Humans ; Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neck Dissection ; methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

OBJECTIVETo compare the perioperative safety and efficacy between hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery(HALS) and conventional open sigmoidectomy.

METHODSA total of 291 patients with sigmoid colon cancer who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2010 to June 2013 were seperated into (HALS) group (n=200) and conventional open surgery (COS) group (n=91) with a non-randomized method. The perioperative safety and efficacy of two groups and perioperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTSThese two groups were comparable in operative time, lymph node harvest, and postoperative complications. However, HALS group had less intraoperative bleeding [(57.9±28.3) ml vs. (82.5±47.6) ml, P=0.000], shorter time to flatus [(3.0±1.4) d vs. (3.3±0.9) d, P=0.000], and shorter hospital stay [(7.3±4.2) d vs. (8.9±4.4) d, P=0.004]. There werer no significant differences in overall survival time and disease-free survival time between the two groups during 6 months to 3 years follow-up.

CONCLUSIONSHALS results in similar outcomes of conventional open surgery for sigmoidectomy with the advantage of minimal invasiveness.

Colectomy ; Disease-Free Survival ; Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Lymph Nodes ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Sigmoid Neoplasms ; Treatment Outcome

Objective: To understand the perceptions, attitudes and treatment selection of Chinese surgeons on the "watch and wait" strategy for rectal cancer patients after achieving a clinical complete response (cCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Methods: A cross-sectional survey was used in this study. Selection of subjects: (1) Domestic public grade III A (provincial and prefecture-level) oncology hospitals or general hospitals possessing the radiotherapy department and the diagnosis and treatment qualifications for colorectal cancer. (2) Surgeons of deputy chief physician or above. Using the "Questionnaire Star" online survey platform to create a questionnaire about cognition, attitude and treatment choice of the "watch and wait" strategy after cCR following nCRT for rectal cancer. The questionnaire contained 32 questions, such as the basic information of doctor, the current status of rectal cancer surgery, the management of pathological complete remission (ypCR) after nCRT for rectal cancer, the selection of examination items for diagnosis of cCR, the selection of suitable people undergoing "watch and wait" approach, the nCRT mode for promotion of cCR, the choice of evaluation time point, the willingness to perform "watch and wait" approach and the treatment choice, and the risk and monitoring of "watch and wait" approach. A total of 116 questionnaires were sent to the respondents via WeChat between January 31 and February 19, 2019. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher′s exact test for categorical variables. Results: Forty-eight hospitals including 116 surgeons meeting criteria were enrolled, of whom 77 surgeons filled the questionnaire with a response rate of 66.4%. "Watch and wait" strategy was carried out in 76.6% (59/77) of surgeons. Seventy surgeons (90.9%) were aware of the ypCR rate of rectal cancer after preoperative nCRT and 49 surgeons (63.6%) knew the 3-year disease-free survival of patients with ypCR in their own hospitals. Fifty-five surgeons (71.4%) believed that patients with ypCR undergoing radical surgery met the treatment criteria and were not over-treated. Three most necessary examinations in diagnosing cCR were colonoscopy (96.1%, 74/77), digital rectal examination (DRE) (90.9%,70/77) and DWI-MRI (83.1%, 64/77). Responders preferred to consider a "watch and wait" strategy for patients with baseline characteristics as mrN0 (77.9%, 60/77), mrT2 (68.8%, 53/77) and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (68.8%, 53/77). Sixty-six surgeons (85.7%) believed that long-term chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) with combination or without combination of induction and/or consolidation of the CapeOX regimen (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) should be the first choice as a neoadjuvant therapy to achieve cCR. Forty-one surgeons (53.2%) believed that a reasonable interval of judging cCR after nCRT should be ≥ 8 weeks. Forty-four surgeons (57.1%) routinely, or in most cases, informed patient the possibility of cCR and proposed to "watch and wait" strategy in the initial diagnosis of patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer. Thirteen surgeons (16.9%) would take the "watch and wait" strategy as the first choice after the patient having cCR. Fifty-two surgeons (67.5%) would be affected by the surgical method, that was to say, "watch and wait" approach would only be recommended to those patients who would achieve cCR and could not preserve the anus or underwent difficult anus-preservation surgery. Sixteen surgeons (20.8%) demonstrated that "watch and wait" strategy would not be recommended to patients with cCR regardless of whether the surgical procedure involved anal sphincter. Eleven surgeons (14.3%) believed that the main risk of "watch and wait" approach came from distant metastasis rather than local recurrence or regrowth. Twenty-nine of surgeons (37.7%) did not understand the difference between "local recurrence" and "local regrowth" during the period of "watch and wait". Twenty-six surgeons (33.8%) thought that the monitoring interval for the first 3 years of "watch and wait" strategy was 3 months, and the follow-up monitoring interval could be 6 months to 5 years. Surgeons from cancer specialist hospitals had higher approval rate, notification rate, and referral rate of "watch and wait" strategy than those from general hospitals. Thirty-one surgeons (42.5%) considered that the difficulty and concern of carrying out "watch and wait" approach in the future was the disease progress leading to medical disputes. Twenty-six surgeons (35.6%) demonstrated that their concern was lack of uniform evaluation standard for cCR. Conclusions Chinese surgeons seem to have inadequate knowledge of non-operative management for rectal cancer patients achieving cCR after nCRT and show relatively conservative attitudes toward the strategy. Chinese consensus needs to be formed to guide the non-operative management in selected patients. Chinese Watch & Wait Database (CWWD) is also needed to establish and provide more evidence for the use of alternative procedure after a cCR following nCRT.

Objective To compare the perioperative safety and efficacy between hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and conventional open sigmoidectomy. Methods A total of 291 patients with sigmoid colon cancer who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2010 to June 2013 were seperated into (HALS) group (n=200) and conventional open surgery (COS) group (n=91) with a non-randomized method. The perioperative safety and efficacy of two groups and perioperative outcomes were compared. Results These two groups were comparable in operative time, lymph node harvest, and postoperative complications. However, HALS group had less intraoperative bleeding [(57.9±28.3) ml vs. (82.5±47.6) ml, P=0.000], shorter time to flatus[(3.0±1.4) d vs. (3.3±0.9) d, P=0.000], and shorter hospital stay[(7.3±4.2) d vs. (8.9±4.4) d, P=0.004]. There werer no significant differences in overall survival time and disease-free survival time between the two groups during 6 months to 3 years follow-up. Conclusions HALS results in similar outcomes of conventional open surgery for sigmoidectomy with the advantage of minimal invasiveness.

Objective To compare the perioperative safety and efficacy between hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and conventional open sigmoidectomy. Methods A total of 291 patients with sigmoid colon cancer who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2010 to June 2013 were seperated into (HALS) group (n=200) and conventional open surgery (COS) group (n=91) with a non-randomized method. The perioperative safety and efficacy of two groups and perioperative outcomes were compared. Results These two groups were comparable in operative time, lymph node harvest, and postoperative complications. However, HALS group had less intraoperative bleeding [(57.9±28.3) ml vs. (82.5±47.6) ml, P=0.000], shorter time to flatus[(3.0±1.4) d vs. (3.3±0.9) d, P=0.000], and shorter hospital stay[(7.3±4.2) d vs. (8.9±4.4) d, P=0.004]. There werer no significant differences in overall survival time and disease-free survival time between the two groups during 6 months to 3 years follow-up. Conclusions HALS results in similar outcomes of conventional open surgery for sigmoidectomy with the advantage of minimal invasiveness.