OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of avatrombopag in promoting platelet engraftment after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in children, compared with recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 53 pediatric patients who underwent allo-HSCT at the Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from April 2023 to August 2024. Based on medications used during the periengraftment period, patients were divided into two groups: the avatrombopag group (n=15) and the rhTPO group (n=38). RESULTS: At days 14, 30, and 60 post-transplant, platelet engraftment was achieved in 20% (3/15), 60% (9/15), and 93% (14/15) of patients in the avatrombopag group, and in 39% (15/38), 82% (31/38), and 97% (37/38) in the rhTPO group, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in platelet engraftment rates at each time point, cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment, overall survival, and relapse-free survival (all P>0.05). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that acute graft-versus-host disease was an independent risk factor for delayed platelet engraftment (P=0.043). CONCLUSIONS In children undergoing allo-HSCT, avatrombopag effectively promotes platelet engraftment, with efficacy and safety comparable to rhTPO, and represents a viable therapeutic option.
Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects* ; Male ; Female ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Infant ; Adolescent ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Blood Platelets/drug effects* ; Thiazoles/therapeutic use* ; Thrombopoietin/therapeutic use* ; Thiophenes

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect and relative mechanism of Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin (rhTPO) on long-term hematopoietic recovery in mice with acute radiation sickness. METHODS: Mice were intramuscularly injected with rhTPO (100 μg/kg) 2 hours after total body irradiation with ⁶⁰Co γ-rays (6.5 Gy). Moreover, six months after irradiation, peripheral blood, hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) ratio, competitive transplantation survival rate and chimerization rate, senescence rate of c-kit⁺ HSC, and p16 and p38 mRNA expression of c-kit⁺ HSC were detected. RESULTS: Six months after 6.5 Gy γ-ray irradiation, there were no differences in peripheral blood white blood cells, red blood cells, platelets, neutrophils and bone marrow nucleated cells in normal group, irradiated group and rhTPO group (P>0.05). The proportion of hematopoietic stem cells and multipotent progenitor cells in mice of irradiated group was significantly decreased after irradiation (P<0.05), but there was no significant changes in rhTPO group (P>0.05). The counts of CFU-MK and BFU-E in irradiated group were significantly lower than that in normal group, and rhTPO group was higher than that of the irradiated group(P<0.05). The 70 day survival rate of recipient mice in normal group and rhTPO group was 100%, and all mice died in irradiation group. The senescence positive rates of c-kit⁺ HSC in normal group, irradiation group and rhTPO group were 6.11%, 9.54% and 6.01%, respectively (P<0.01). Compared with the normal group, the p16 and p38 mRNA expression of c-kit⁺ HSC in the irradiated mice were significantly increased (P<0.01), and it was markedly decreased after rhTPO administration (P<0.01). CONCLUSION The hematopoietic function of mice is still decreased 6 months after 6.5 Gy γ-ray irradiation, suggesting that there may be long-term damage. High-dose administration of rhTPO in the treatment of acute radiation sickness can reduce the senescence of HSC through p38-p16 pathway and improve the long-term damage of hematopoietic function in mice with acute radiation sickness.
Humans ; Mice ; Animals ; Thrombopoietin/metabolism* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cells ; Blood Platelets ; Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use* ; Radiation Injuries ; RNA, Messenger/metabolism*

SARS-CoV-2-induced immune thrombocytopenia (SARS-CoV-2-induced ITP) is an autoimmune disease secondary to virus infections. Its diagnosis is often based on exclusion of other possible causes of thrombocytopenia in COVID-19 patients. Common laboratory examinations include coagulation function, thrombopoietin and drug-dependent antibodies. Since both bleeding and thrombosis risks are seen in SARS-CoV-2-induced ITP patients, individual remedy is essential for the treatment of this disease. Because thrombopoietin receptor agonist(TPO-RA) has the side effect of accelerating thrombosis and may aggravate the pulmonary embolism symptoms of patients, it should be used for refractory SARS-CoV-2-induced ITP patients only. This review briefly summarizes the recent research progress in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of SARS-CoV-2-induced ITP.
Humans ; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/drug therapy* ; SARS-CoV-2 ; COVID-19/complications* ; Thrombocytopenia ; Thrombosis/drug therapy* ; Thrombopoietin/therapeutic use* ; Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use*

OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare the efficacy of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) and recombinant human interleukin-11 (rhIL-11) in the treatment of thrombocytopenia after chemotherapy in acute leukemia patients. METHODS: 180 patients with acute leukemia complicated with thrombocytopenia after chemotherapy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 50 patients who treated with rhTPO and did not receive platelet transfusion were set as group A, 50 patients treated with rhTPO and receive platelet transfusion were set as group B, Forty patients treated with rhIL-11 without platelet transfusion were set as group C, Forty patients who treated with rhIL-11 and received platelet transfusion were set as group D. The duration of PLT below 20×10⁹/L, the days it takes for PLT to recover to more than 100×10⁹/L, and the incidence of different bleeding degrees were compared among several groups. RESULTS: The duration of PLT<20×10⁹/L in group A(3.72±1.14 d) was significantly shorter than that in group C(4.93±1.33 d) (P<0.001), and there was no significant difference from group B (P>0.05). The duration of PLT<20×10⁹/L in group B(3.06±0.91 d) was significantly shorter than that in group D(4.65±0.98 d) (P<0.001), while the difference in duration of days between group C and D was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The times for PLT to recover to 100×10⁹/L in group A(13.46±1.67 d) were significantly shorter than that in group C(16.85±2.13 d) (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference from group B (P>0.05). The time required for PLT to recover to 100×10⁹/L in group B(13.36±1.49 d) were significantly shorter than that in group D(16.18±1.78 d) (P<0.05), while the difference in the days required for group C and group D was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The incidence of high bleeding risk in group B was significantly lower than that in group A (22% vs 44%, P<0.05), the incidence of high bleeding risk in group D was significantly lower than that in group C (32% vs 65%, P<0.05), and the incidence of high bleeding risk in group A was significantly lower than that in group C (44% vs 65%, P<0.05). The incidence of high bleeding risk in group B(22%) was lower than that in group D(32.5%), and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSION In the treatment of acute leukemia patients with thrombocytopenia after chemotherapy, compared with rhIL-11, rhTPO can significantly shorten the duration for patients in a status with extremely low levels of PLT and the recovery time of PLT to normal range. In addition, PLT transfusion cannot speed up the time for patients to raise platelets to a safe range, nor can it shorten the duration of low PLT levels, but it can reduce the incidence of high bleeding risk events.
Humans ; Interleukin-11 ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Platelet Count ; Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Thrombocytopenia ; Thrombopoietin/therapeutic use*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) combined with glucocorticoid in treatment of newly diagnosed adult primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). METHODS: Eleven male and 23 female patients with the diagnosis of primary ITP in our hospital from November 2018 to October 2019 were enrolled and randomly divided into test group (17 cases) and control group (17 cases), the median age was 52 years old (range: 20-76 years old). The patients in test group were treated with rhTPO 300 IU/(kg·d) combined with glucocorticoid , while the patients in control group were treated with rhTPO (15 000 IU/d) combined with glucocorticoid. Platelet count, platelet increase, as well as the overall response rate were compared. At the same time, the drug tolerance and any adverse drug reactions were observed. RESULTS: The platelet counts and platelet increase of the patients in the test group were significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in platelet counts and platelet increase between the patients in the test group and control group at day 3, 7 after treatment. There was no significant difference in overall response rates and complete response rates at day 7, 14 between the two groups either. In test group, there were 13 cases received platelet transfusion, while 12 cases in control group. The muscle aches occurred in one patient, and mild aminotransferase increased in another patient in test group which was self-recovery without treatment. CONCLUSION RhTPO 300 U/(kg·d) combined with glucocorticoid could rapidly increase the platelet count with a low incidence of tolerable adverse events compared with conventional dose rhTPO with glucocorticoid.
Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Platelet Count ; Platelet Transfusion ; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/drug therapy* ; Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use* ; Thrombopoietin/therapeutic use* ; Young Adult

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rh-TPO) and eltrombopag are two distinct TPO receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) with different mechanisms. During the pandemic, when immunosuppressive medications are controversial, switching to another TPO-RA may be worth exploring in patients who do not benefit from their first TPO-RA. We investigated the outcomes of switching from rh-TPO to eltrombopag or vice versa in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, observational investigation included 96 adult ITP patients who needed to switch between rh-TPO and eltrombopag between January 2020 and January 2021 at Peking University People's Hospital in China. The study evaluated response rates and platelet counts at different time points after the switch, bleeding events, time to response, duration of response, and adverse events. RESULTS: At 6 weeks after switching, response was observed in 21/49 patients (43%) who switched for inefficacy and 34/47 patients (72%) who switched for non-efficacy-related issues. In the inefficacy group, 9/27 patients (33%) responded to eltrombopag, and 12/22 patients (55%) responded to rh-TPO. In the non-efficacy-related group, 21/26 (81%) and 13/21 (62%) patients in the eltrombopag and rh-TPO groups maintained their response rates at 6 weeks after switching, respectively. Response at 6 months was achieved in 24/49 patients (49%) switching for inefficacy and 37/47 patients (79%) switching for non-efficacy issues. In the inefficacy group, 13/27 patients (48%) responded to eltrombopag, and 11/22 patients (50%) responded to rh-TPO. In the non-efficacy-related group, 22/26 patients (85%) and 15/21 patients (71%) in the eltrombopag and rh-TPO groups maintained their response rates at 6 months after switching, respectively. Both eltrombopag and rh-TPO were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed the safety and effectiveness of switching between rh-TPO and eltrombopag for ITP patients who had no response to or experienced adverse events with their first TPO-RA. When the switch was motivated by other reasons, including patient preference and platelet count fluctuations, the probability of response was high. REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04214951.
Adult ; Humans ; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic ; Thrombopoietin/adverse effects* ; Prospective Studies ; Recombinant Fusion Proteins ; Receptors, Fc/therapeutic use* ; Receptors, Thrombopoietin/therapeutic use* ; Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced* ; Benzoates/adverse effects* ; Hydrazines/adverse effects*

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) treatment for primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients during the perioperative period. Methods: Adult ITP patients who were refractory to first-line glucocorticoid therapy and underwent selective surgery were enrolled to be treated with rhTPO at the dosage of 1.5×10(4)U/d subcutaneously during the perioperative period. rhTPO treatment would not be terminated until one of the following conditions occurred: ①Platelet counts met the requirement of surgery; ②Platelet counts were ≥100×10(9)/L; ③Completed the 14 days of therapy. End points of the study were surgery rate, rhTPO therapy response rate, rescue therapy rate and adverse responses. Results: 42 patients were enrolled from Jan. 1, 2016 to Jun. 30, 2018. 14 were male and 28 were female. The median age was 60 (25-73) years old. There were no newly diagnosed patients. 5 patients were persistent and 37 were chronic. 27 patients completed selective surgery. The surgery rate was 64.3% (27/42) . Among them, 13 patients were under local anesthesia and 14 under general anesthesia. Of 42 cases receiving rhTPO therapy. 31 patients achieved responses, The overall response rate was of 73.8%. Among them, 24 patients achieved CR. The CR ratio was 77.4% (24/31) . 7 achieved response. The response ratio was 22.6% (7/31) . 11 patients did not respond to rhTPO therapy. The non-response rate was 26.2% (11/42) . The median time to reach CR was 7 (3-16) days. The median time to reach the peak of platelet counts were 10 (3-21) days. rhTPO was used for a median of 7 (3-14) days. The median platelet counts of patients undergoing surgery before rhTPO therapy, before surgery and at day 7 after surgery were 33 (20-89) ×10(9)/L, 125 (78-245) ×10(9)/L and 72 (30-250) ×10(9)/L, respectively. The median peak of platelet counts was 149 (101-466) ×10(9)/L. No infection, bleeding, thromboembolism and therapy-related adverse responses occurred in the patients. Conclusion: rhTPO for ITP patients during the perioperative period is safe and effective.
Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Perioperative Period ; Platelet Count ; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/drug therapy* ; Recombinant Proteins ; Thrombopoietin/therapeutic use*

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the therapeutic effects of combined administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF), recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) and recombinant human interleukin-2 (rhIL-2) on radiation-induced severe haemopoietic acute radiation sickness (ARS) in rhesus monkeys, so as to provide experimental evidences for the effective clinical treatment.

METHODSSeventeen rhesus monkeys were exposed to 7.0 Gy (60)Co γ-ray total body irradiation (TBI) to establish severe haemopoietic ARS model, and were randomly divided into supportive care group, rhG-CSF+rhTPO treatment group and rhG-CSF+rhTPO+rhIL-2 treatment group. Survival time, general signs such as bleeding and infections, and peripheral blood cell counts in each group were monitored. Bone marrow cells were cultivated to examine the colony formation ability. The histomorphology changes of bone marrow were observed at 45 d post irradiation.

RESULTSAfter 7.0 Gy (60)Co γ-ray TBI, monkeys of supportive care group underwent tarry stool and emesis, then died in 12~18 d. The overall survival rate in this group was 16.7%. Gastrointestinal reactions of monkeys in two combined-cytokines treatment groups were inapparent. Combined-cytokines treatment induced 100% survival. Complete blood cells declined sharply after irradiation in each group, but two combined-cytokines treatment schemes could elevate the nadir of all blood cells, shorten the duration of pancytopenia and accelerate the recovery of hemogram. Compared with rhG-CSF+ rhTPO treatment, rhG-CSF+ rhTPO+ rhIL-2 treatment could increase the counts of lymphocytes and monocytes. The colony-formation rate of haemopoietic stem/progenitor cells in bone marrow dropped markedly at 2 d after irradiation. Combined-cytokines treatment promoted the ability of colony formation on day 29. Hematopoietic cells mostly disappeared in bone marrow of animals in supportive care group, but hematopoietic functions were recovered after cytokines were administrated.

CONCLUSIONrhG-CSF+ rhTPO and rhG-CSF+ rhTPO+ rhIL-2 treatment can significantly promote hematopoiesis recovery, improve the quantity of life, simplify the supportive therapy, and enhance the survival rate of rhesus monkeys with severe haemopoietic ARS induced by 7.0 Gy (60)Co γ-ray exposure. Especially the application of rhIL-2 can accelerate the recovery of lymphocytes and monocytes and restore the immunological function. Thus, combination of rhG-CSF, rhTPO and rhIL-2 on the basis of supportive care is an efficient strategy to treat severe haemopoietic ARS.

Animals ; Bone Marrow ; pathology ; Bone Marrow Cells ; pathology ; Gamma Rays ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; pharmacology ; Hematopoiesis ; drug effects ; Hematopoietic Stem Cells ; cytology ; Humans ; Interleukin-2 ; pharmacology ; Macaca mulatta ; Radiation Injuries ; drug therapy ; Random Allocation ; Recombinant Proteins ; therapeutic use ; Thrombopoietin ; pharmacology ; Whole-Body Irradiation

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) for treatment of patients with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

METHODSThe clinical data of 96 patients with newly diagnosed ITP from August 2013 to August 2015 were analyzed retrospectively, 96 patients were divided into the rhTPO group (46 cases) and the control group (50 cases). Patients in the rhTPO group received subcutaneous injection of rhTPO at a dose of 300 U/(kg·d) for a maximum of 14 days, and control group was treated with glucocorticoid (standard dose) for 28 days. Then the efficacy and adverse reactions between the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTSCompared with the control group, the patients in rhTPO group achieved higher complete response (CR) rate (56.5% vs 34.0%) (P = 0.03), shorter median time when platelet counts reached 100 × 10(9)/L[10 (5-14) d vs 14 (6-26) d, P < 0.01] and less adverse reactions (4.4% vs 82.0%) (P < 0.01). After the withdrawal of rhTPO, platelet counts gradually decreased. Sex, age and the presence of HP infection had no influence on efficacy of rhTPO (P > 0.10), but when Plt count was too low (≤10 × 10(9)/L), the proportion of patients obtaining CR showed an decreased tendency, as compared with those with Plt>10 × 10(9)/L (38.9% vs 67.9%) (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONrhTPO has satisfactory therapeutic effect and enough safety for patients with newly diagnosed ITP, however, its long-term efficacy should be furtherly improved.

Adult ; Glucocorticoids ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Platelet Count ; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic ; drug therapy ; Recombinant Proteins ; therapeutic use ; Remission Induction ; Retrospective Studies ; Thrombopoietin ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of high dose dexamethasone combined with recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in adults with severe newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

METHODSForty-eight adult patients with severe ITP were randomized into two groups, experimental group and control group. The patients in experimental group were given high-dose dexamethasone combined with rhTPO treatment, the patients in control group were given single high-dose dexamethasone treatment. Platelet count, platelet increase, as well as the overall response rate were strictly observed in the process. At the same time, the patient's drug tolerance and any adverse drug reactions were observed.

RESULTSThe platelet counts and platelet increase of the patients in experimental group were significantly higher than that in control group (P<0.05) at day 3, 7, 14, 30. There was no significant difference in overall response rates between the two groups (34.8% vs 36.0%, 56.5% vs 48.0%, P>0.05) at day 3, 7. The overall response rates of experimental group at day 14, 30 were significantly higher than that of control group (91.3% vs 68.0%, 82.6% vs 52.0%, P<0.05). The muscle aches occurred in one patient in experimental group which was self-recovery without special treatment.

CONCLUSIONrhTPO combined with high-dose dexamethasone could rapidly increase the platelet count, reduce the risk of bleeding, and prolonge the effect with a low incidence of tolerable adverse events compared to single high-dose dexamethasone. rhTPO combined with high-dose dexamethasone could be a new therapeutic choice for severe primary ITP.

Adult ; Blood Platelets ; Dexamethasone ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Platelet Count ; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic ; drug therapy ; Recombinant Proteins ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Thrombopoietin ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome