China ; epidemiology ; Humans ; Venous Thromboembolism ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; epidemiology

Humans ; Factor XI ; Thromboembolism/drug therapy* ; Anticoagulants/therapeutic use*

Lung cancer patients have increased risk of thromboembolism (TE) due to various factors such as by hypercoagulability, tumor thrombosis, decrease of ambulation, and chemotherapy etc. Among these factors, chemotherapy associated TEs have been reported, although the causes and pathomechanisms of TEs were not clear. Recently, reports proposed the potential role of platelets in endothelial damage by the chemotherapeutic agents. We have experienced a case of pulmonary TE after systemic chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. The patient complained aggravated exertional dyspnea after chemotherapy and diagnosed as pulmonary TE by computerized tomogram. After anticoagulation and interruption of the chemotherapy, improvement of exertional dyspnea and resolution of the pulmonary TE were observed
Cisplatin* ; Drug Therapy* ; Dyspnea ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms* ; Lung* ; Pulmonary Embolism* ; Thromboembolism ; Thrombophilia ; Thrombosis ; Walking

Lung cancer is the first leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a recognized complication in patients with lung cancer, which is one of the leading cause of death in lung cancer patients. The cancer-related, patient-related and treatment-related factors are the main causes of VTE in lung cancer patients. Malignant cells can directly activate blood coagulation by producing tissue factor (TF), cancer procoagulance (CP), inflammatory factors and cytokines; And the one of predominant mechanisms in cancer-related thrombosis is the overexpression of TF. The 10th edition of the antithrombotic therapy guidelines for VTE with cancer patients (AT-10) published in 2016 by American College of Chest Physicians (APCC) recommended that anticoagulant therapy is the basic treatment for patients with lung cancer complicated with VTE; And low molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) is preferred as an anticoagulant drug, but can be use with caution due to increasing risk of bleeding.
.
Anticoagulants ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; complications ; Risk Factors ; Venous Thromboembolism ; complications ; drug therapy

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different bridging anticoagulant therapies in patients undergoing mechanical heart valve replacement (MHVR) surgery. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing MHVR surgery from January 2018 to December 2018 in First Hospital of Lanzhou University were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into unfractionated heparin (UFH) group and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) group according to the postoperative bridging anticoagulation methods. Preoperative clinical data and postoperative related time and cost parameters, including drainage time, duration of stay in intensive care unit (ICU), postoperative time (interval from end of operation to discharge) and INR stabilization time (interval from start of bridge anticoagulation to INR value reaching the standard for 2 consecutive days) of all enrolled patients were collected, and all patients were followed up for 4 weeks and thromboembolic or bleeding events were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the independent prognostic factors of thromboembolic or bleeding events after MHVR receiving various bridging anticoagulant therapies. Results: A total of 217 patients were included in the study, including 120 patients in the UFH group and 97 patients in the LMWH group. Stroke occurred in two patients in the UFH group, while no stroke event occurred in the LMWH group. The incidence of bleeding events was significantly higher (9.28%(9/97) vs. 1.67%(2/120), P=0.02), while the drainage time, duration of stay in ICU, postoperative time, INR stabilization time were all significantly shorter in LMWH group than in UFH group (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that bridging anticoagulation therapies (OR=0.18, 95%CI 0.04-0.86, P=0.03), fibrinogen level (OR=1.99, 95%CI 1.16-3.41, P=0.01) and creatinine level (OR=1.05, 95%CI 1.01-1.08, P=0.04) were independent prognostic factors for bleeding events. Conclusion: LMWH use is associated with increased risk of bleeding events, but can significantly reduce the drainage time, duration of stay in ICU, postoperative time, INR stabilization time in patients post MHVR surgery.
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use* ; Heart Valves ; Heparin ; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight ; Humans ; Thromboembolism/drug therapy*

Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Thromboembolism ; blood ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; etiology

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk factors affecting thromboembolism in lymphoma patients with chemotherapy. METHODS: Three hundred and four consecutive lymphoma patients treated by chemotherapy between January 2012 and July 2019 were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed, consisting of 111 patients with thromboembolism and 193 without thromboembolism. Univariate analysis was used to compare the clinical characteristics and related laboratory examination between the patients, while multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to identify the risk factors affecting thromboembolism in lymphoma patients with chemotherapy. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that the female, BMI <18.5 or >24, ≥60 years old, with abnormal platelets before chemotherapy, prolonged single hospitalization days and patients at Ann Arbor stage III and IV could increase the incidence of thromboembolism in lymphoma patients treated by chemotherapy. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that abnormal platelet count before chemotherapy, patients at Ann Arbor stage III and IV, and female were all the independent risk factors affecting thromboembolism in lymphoma patients thromboembolism after chemotherapy (P<0.05). CONCLUSION For lymphoma chemotherapy patients, female, abnormal platelet count before chemotherapy and Ann Arbor stages III and IV show a significantly higher risk for thromboembolism. Thus, preventive anticoagulation therapy is recommended.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Female ; Humans ; Lymphoma/drug therapy* ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Thromboembolism/epidemiology*

Object We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in the prevention and treatment of thrombotic diseases in patients with active cancer. Methods: To find randomized controlled trials (RCT) in which NOACs were compared VKAs in active cancer, we searched the electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Clinical Trials) up to May 2019 and and languages restricted to Chinese and English. According to the screening strategy, two researchers independently screened and extracted literature, evaluated the quality of literature, the suitability of collected cross study data for analysis, and tested the heterogeneity. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of major bleeding, clinically related non-major bleeding, VTE, stroke and all-cause mortality in active cancer patients with VTE, active cancer patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) was calculated and the results were compared between NOAC with VKA. Results: A total of 9 RCTs were included, including 5 cancers with VTE (5/9) and 4 cancers with NVAF (4/9). A total of 5 867 patients were included. After excluding 1 818 (30.99%) patients with cancer history, 4 049 (68.86%) patients with active cancer were statistically analyzed. Among them, 2 278 (56.26%) received NOAC treatment, 1 771 patients (43.74%) received VKA treatment. The quality of the included documents was high (all scores were>5 points), and the data of each included document could be summarized and analyzed (P>0.05). The heterogeneity of main outcome events was very low (I² = 0). In VTE patients with active cancer, NOACs were more effective in reducing recurrence of VTE （RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.36 -0.84; P = 0.005) and clinically related non-major bleeding (RR=0.77, 95%CI 0.60 -0.98; P = 0.03) than VKAs. In NVAF patients with active cancer, efficacy of NOACs and VKAs was similar in terms of reducing VTE, stroke, clinically related non-major bleeding, major bleeding and all-cause mortality events (P>0.05). Conclusions: For patients with active cancer accompanied by VTE, NOAC may has more advantages in efficacy and safety compared to VKA in the prevention and treatment of thrombotic diseases.
Administration, Oral ; Anticoagulants/therapeutic use* ; Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy* ; Humans ; Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control* ; Vitamin K/therapeutic use*

Angiogenesis Inhibitors ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Myeloma ; drug therapy ; Risk Factors ; Thalidomide ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Thromboembolism ; chemically induced ; diagnosis

PURPOSE: Cisplatin-associated arterial and venous thromboembolic events (TEEs) are becoming an increasing concern. In patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who are treated using cisplatin-based chemotherapy, we assume that the overall risk of TEEs is high. However, cisplatin-associated vascular toxicity in patients with SCLC has been overlooked to date. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of TEEs in patients with SCLC and to analyze the predictors for TEE occurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 277 patients who received chemotherapy for SCLC between 2006 and 2012. As the influence of chemotherapy on TEE occurrence developed after its initiation, a time-dependent Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the significant predictors for TEE. RESULTS: Among the 277 patients, 30 patients (11%) developed a TEE. The 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year cumulative incidences of TEEs were 5.0%, 9.1%, and 10.2%, respectively. Of 30 total TEEs, 22 (73%) occurred between the time of initiation and 4 weeks after the last dose of platinum-based chemotherapy. Approximately 218 patients (79%) received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, cisplatin-based chemotherapy was an independent risk factor for TEE occurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 4.36; p=0.05). Variables including smoking status (common HR, 2.14; p=0.01) and comorbidity index (common HR, 1.60; p=0.05) also showed significant association with TEE occurrence. CONCLUSION: The 1-year cumulative incidence of TEE is 10.2% in Asian patients with SCLC. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy in SCLC might be a strong predictor for the risk of TEE.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Cisplatin ; Comorbidity ; Drug Therapy* ; Humans ; Incidence ; Lung Neoplasms* ; Lung* ; Multivariate Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors* ; Small Cell Lung Carcinoma ; Smoke ; Smoking ; Thromboembolism