1.A Review of the Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors on Lean Body Mass in Humans
Jack Alistair SARGEANT ; Joseph HENSON ; James Adam KING ; Thomas YATES ; Kamlesh KHUNTI ; Melanie Jane DAVIES
Endocrinology and Metabolism 2019;34(3):247-262
Weight loss is an important goal in the management of several chronic conditions, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, and pharmacological therapies that aid weight loss are appealing. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are novel glucose-lowering therapies that have been shown to induce clinically significant reductions in body weight. However, this weight loss may not be attributed solely to fat mass (FM). Given the importance of skeletal muscle and lean body mass (LBM) on cardio-metabolic health and physical function, we reviewed the available literature reporting the effects of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is on body composition. Results demonstrate that, in most circumstances, the weight loss associated with both therapies predominantly comprises a reduction in FM, although significant heterogeneity exists between studies. In over half of the studies identified, the proportion of LBM reduction ranged between 20% and 50% of total weight lost, which is consistent with diet-induced weight loss and bariatric surgery. No clear differences existed between GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is. Consequently, the loss of LBM and skeletal muscle associated with weight loss induced by GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is warrants attention. Strategies to preserve skeletal muscle and improve physical function, for example through structured exercise, are of great importance.
Bariatric Surgery
;
Body Composition
;
Body Weight
;
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
;
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
;
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor
;
Humans
;
Muscle, Skeletal
;
Population Characteristics
;
Weight Loss
2.Association of Biomarker Levels with Severity of Asbestos-Related Diseases.
Eun Kee PARK ; Deborah H YATES ; Jenette CREANEY ; Paul S THOMAS ; Bruce W ROBINSON ; Anthony R JOHNSON
Safety and Health at Work 2012;3(1):17-21
OBJECTIVES: Asbestos-related diseases (ARDs) have increased globally over the decades, causing an economic burden and increased health care costs. It is difficult to predict the risk of development of ARDs and of respiratory disability among workers with a history of asbestos exposure. Blood based biomarkers have been reported as promising tools for the early detection of malignant mesothelioma. This study investigated whether serum soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) would reflect severity of disablement in compensable ARDs. METHODS: SMRP levels were measured in a cohort of 514 asbestos-exposed subjects. Severity of ARDs was assessed by a Medical Authority comprising four specially qualified respiratory physicians. Severity of ARDs and SMRP levels were compared. RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation) serum SMRP level in the population with compensable ARDs (n = 150) was 0.95 (0.65) nmol/L, and was positively associated with disability assessment (p = 0.01). Mean SMRP level in healthy asbestos-exposed subjects was significantly lower than those with pleural plaques (p < 0.0001) and in subjects with ARDs who received compensation (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that serum SMRP levels correlate with severity of compensable ARDs. Serum SMRP could potentially be applied to monitor progress of ARDs. Further prospective work is needed to confirm the relationship between SMRP and disability assessment in this population.
Asbestos
;
Biomarkers
;
Cohort Studies
;
Compensation and Redress
;
Health Care Costs
;
Mesothelioma
;
Organothiophosphorus Compounds
3.Follow-up of Soluble Mesothelin-Related Protein Levels in Participants With Asbestos-Related Disorders
Author links open overlay panelEun-Kee PARK ; Anthony R. JOHNSON ; Donald WILSON ; Paul S. THOMAS ; Deborah H. YATES
Safety and Health at Work 2020;11(4):425-430
Background:
Asbestos exposure is associated with the development of the cancer malignant mesothelioma (MM). Measurement of soluble mesothelin-related protein (SMRP) has been suggested as a method for detection of MM in its early stages. We prospectively examined SMRP levels in participants with asbestos exposure who are a group at a high risk of development of MM.
Methods:
This study was a follow-up of our cohort of 322 asbestos-exposed participants. No further participants developed MM or malignancy over the study period. Mean follow-up time was 22.9 months.
Results:
Mean (standard deviation) SMRP levels at baseline and follow-up were 0.94 (0.79) and 0.91 (0.86) nmol/L (p = 0.1033), respectively. Mean SMRP levels of the healthy individuals exposed to asbestos at baseline was significantly lower than those of participants with asbestosis and pleural plaques alone; similar patterns were found on follow-up measurements. There was a statistically significant effect of age on serial SMRP measurements. Our study confirms higher levels in participants with nonmalignant asbestos-related disorders. Levels decreased in asbestos-related disorders other than asbestosis, where a small increase was observed. We did not detect any further cases of malignancy.
Conclusion
Monitoring programs for early detection of MM need to take into account increased SMRP levels found in benign asbestos-related diseases.
4.Follow-up of Soluble Mesothelin-Related Protein Levels in Participants With Asbestos-Related Disorders
Author links open overlay panelEun-Kee PARK ; Anthony R. JOHNSON ; Donald WILSON ; Paul S. THOMAS ; Deborah H. YATES
Safety and Health at Work 2020;11(4):425-430
Background:
Asbestos exposure is associated with the development of the cancer malignant mesothelioma (MM). Measurement of soluble mesothelin-related protein (SMRP) has been suggested as a method for detection of MM in its early stages. We prospectively examined SMRP levels in participants with asbestos exposure who are a group at a high risk of development of MM.
Methods:
This study was a follow-up of our cohort of 322 asbestos-exposed participants. No further participants developed MM or malignancy over the study period. Mean follow-up time was 22.9 months.
Results:
Mean (standard deviation) SMRP levels at baseline and follow-up were 0.94 (0.79) and 0.91 (0.86) nmol/L (p = 0.1033), respectively. Mean SMRP levels of the healthy individuals exposed to asbestos at baseline was significantly lower than those of participants with asbestosis and pleural plaques alone; similar patterns were found on follow-up measurements. There was a statistically significant effect of age on serial SMRP measurements. Our study confirms higher levels in participants with nonmalignant asbestos-related disorders. Levels decreased in asbestos-related disorders other than asbestosis, where a small increase was observed. We did not detect any further cases of malignancy.
Conclusion
Monitoring programs for early detection of MM need to take into account increased SMRP levels found in benign asbestos-related diseases.