1.Affective Flattening in Patients with Schizophrenia: Differential Association with Amygdala Response to Threat-Related Facial Expression under Automatic and Controlled Processing Conditions.
Christian LINDNER ; Udo DANNLOWSKI ; Jochen BAUER ; Patricia OHRMANN ; Rebekka LENCER ; Pienie ZWITSERLOOD ; Harald KUGEL ; Thomas SUSLOW
Psychiatry Investigation 2016;13(1):102-111
OBJECTIVE: Early neuroimaging studies have demonstrated amygdala hypoactivation in schizophrenia but more recent research based on paradigms with minimal cognitive loads or examining automatic processing has observed amygdala hyperactivation. Hyperactivation was found to be related to affective flattening. In this study, amygdala responsivity to threat-related facial expression was investigated in patients as a function of automatic versus controlled processing and patients' flat affect. METHODS: Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure amygdala activation in 36 patients with schizophrenia and 42 healthy controls. During scanning, a viewing task with masked and unmasked fearful and neutral faces was presented. RESULTS: Patients exhibited increased amygdala response to unmasked fearful faces. With respect to masked fearful faces, no between-group differences emerged for the sample as a whole but a subsample of patients with flat affect showed heightened amygdala activation. The amygdala response to masked fearful faces was positively correlated with the degree of flat affect. Conversely, amygdala response to unmasked fearful faces was negatively correlated to the severity of affective flattening. In patients, amygdala responses to masked and unmasked fearful faces showed an inverse correlation. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that amygdala hyperresponsivity to unmasked fearful faces might be a functional characteristic of schizophrenia. Amygdala hyperresponsivity to masked fearful faces might be a specific characteristic of patients with affective flattening. A model of flat affect as a response mechanism to emotional overload is proposed.
Amygdala*
;
Facial Expression*
;
Humans
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Masks
;
Neuroimaging
;
Schizophrenia*
2.Safety of long-term subcutaneous free flap skin banking after skin-sparing mastectomy.
Ralph VERSTAPPEN ; Gabriel DJEDOVIC ; Evi Maria MORANDI ; Dietmar HEISER ; Ulrich Michael RIEGER ; Thomas BAUER
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2018;45(2):146-151
BACKGROUND: A persistent problem in autologous breast reconstruction in skin-sparing mastectomies is skin restoration after skin necrosis or secondary oncological resection. As a solution to facilitate reconstruction, skin banking of free-flap skin has been proposed in cases where the overlying skin envelope must be resected, as this technique spares the patient an additional donor site. Herein, we present the largest series to date in which this method was used. We investigated its safety and the possibility of skin banking for prolonged periods of time. METHODS: All skin-sparing mastectomies and immediate autologous breast reconstructions from December 2009 until June 2013 at our institution were analysed. RESULTS: We identified 31 patients who underwent 33 free flap reconstructions in which skin banking was performed. Our median skin banking period was 7 days, with a maximum duration of 171 days. In 22.5% of cases, the banked skin was used to reconstruct overlying skin defects, and in 9.6% of cases to reconstruct the nipple-areolar complex. Microbiological and histological investigations of the banked skin revealed neither clinical infections nor malignancies. CONCLUSIONS: In situ skin banking, even for prolonged periods of time, is a safe and cost-effective method to ensure that skin defects due to necrosis or secondary oncological resection can be easily reconstructed.
Breast Neoplasms
;
Female
;
Free Tissue Flaps*
;
Humans
;
Mammaplasty
;
Mastectomy*
;
Methods
;
Necrosis
;
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
;
Skin*
;
Tissue Donors
;
Transplantation, Autologous