Background/Aims: Motility, stool characteristics, and microbiota composition are expected to modulate probiotics’ passage through the gut but their effects on persistence after intake cessation remain uncharacterized. This pilot, open-label study aims at characterizing probiotic fecal detection parameters (onset, persistence, and duration) and their relationship with whole gut transit time (WGTT). Correlations with fecal microbiota composition are also explored. Methods: Thirty healthy adults (30.4 ± 13.3 years) received a probiotic (30 × 10 9 CFU/capsule/day, 2 weeks; containing Lactobacillus helveticus R0052, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei HA-108, Bifidobacterium breve HA-129, Bifidobacterium longum R0175, and Streptococcus thermophilus HA-110). Probiotic intake was flanked by 4-week washout periods, with 18 stool collections throughout the study. WGTT was measured using 80% recovery of radio-opaque markers. Results: Tested strains were detected in feces ~1-2 days after first intake and persistence after intake cessation was not significantly different for R0052, HA-108, and HA-129 (~3-6 days). We identified 3 WGTT subgroups within this population (named Fast, Intermediate, and Slow), which could be classified by machine learning with high accuracy based on differentially abundant taxa. On average, R0175persisted significantly longer in the intermediate WGTT subgroup (~8.5 days), which was mainly due to 6 of the 13 Intermediate participants for whom R0175 persisted ≥ 15 days. Machine learning classified these 13 participants according to their WGTT cluster (≥ 15 days or < 5 days) with high accuracy, highlighting differentially abundant taxa potentially associated with R0175 persistence. Conclusion These results support the notion that host-specific parameters such as WGTT and microbiota composition should be considered when designing studies involving probiotics, especially for the optimization of washout duration in crossover studies but also for the definition of enrollment criteria or supplementation regimen in specific populations.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Visceral pain and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) dysregulation is a common characteristic in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. Previously, we reported that a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) prevents chronic stress-mediated brain function abnormalities by attenuating the HPA axis response. Here, we compared the effect between different probiotic treatments on the perception of visceral pain during colorectal distension (CRD) following a chronic stress and the consequences to the activity of the HPA axis. METHODS: After a 2-week treatment with a combined probiotic formulation, or L. helveticus or B. longum alone in stressed mice, the visceral pain in response to CRD was recorded. The expression of glucocorticoid receptors was determined in the different brain areas involved in the stress response (hypothalamus, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex). The plasma levels of stress hormones were also measured. RESULTS: A pretreatment using the combination of probiotic formulation significantly reduces the chronic stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity respectively at 0.06, 0.08, and 0.10 mL CRD volume. However, a single probiotic (B. longum or L. helveticus) administration is less effective in reducing visceral pain in stressed mice. Moreover, the expression of the glucocorticoid receptor mRNA was consistently up-regulated in several brain areas after pretreatment with a combined probiotic, which correlated with the normalization of stress response compared to the inconsistent effects of a single probiotic. CONCLUSION: The combination of L. helveticus and B. longum is more effective in regulating glucocorticoid negative feedback on the HPA axis than probiotic alone and subsequently in treating stress-induced visceral pain.
Animals ; Bifidobacterium ; Brain ; Hippocampus ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome ; Lactobacillus helveticus ; Lactobacillus ; Mice ; Plasma ; Probiotics ; Receptors, Glucocorticoid ; RNA, Messenger ; Sulfalene ; Visceral Pain