OBJECTIVE: The EXforge Clinical evaluation of amlodlpine and valsarTan in hypErtension (EXCITE) study was designed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of amlodipine/valsartan (Aml/Val) and amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (Aml/Val/HCT) single-pill combination (SPC) in patients with hypertension.
METHODOLOGY: This 26-week observational, multicenter, prospective, open-label study included patients aged ? 18 years of age with established diagnosis of hypertension. The change in mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP), diastolic BP (msDBP) from baseline to Week 26, proportion of patients achieving BP goal (msSBP/msDBP <130/80 mmHg and <140/90 mmHg for patients with and without diabetes,respectively) at endpoint, and safety were monitored. Here, we report the data of patients from the Philippines.
RESULTS: Of the total 1,054 patients in the full analysis set (Aml/Val, n=928; Aml/Val/HCTZ, n=126), 923 (87.6%) patients completed the study. The baseline BP was 158.5/96.5 and 167.0/99.5 mmHg in the Aml/Val and Aml/Val/HCTZ groups,respectively. Significant reductions in msSBP and msDBP from baseline to week 26 were observed with both Aml/Val (-31.9/-19.2 mmHg). Adverse events were reported by 8.8% of the patients.
CONCLUSION: The Aml/Val and Aml/Val/HCTZ SPCs were effective in controlling BP and were generally well tolerated in patients with hypertension from the Philippines.

Human ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Young Adult ; Amlodipine ; Amlodipine, Valsartan Drug Combination ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Hydrochlorothiazide ; Hypertension ; Philippines ; Tetrazoles ; Valine ; Valsartan

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil compared with losartan potassium in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

METHODThis is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel, multi-center study. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, a total of 287 eligible subjects were randomized at 1:1 ratio to receive olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg or losartan potassium 50 mg, once daily for 8 weeks. The blood pressure was assessed after 4 weeks treatment. If the subject's seating diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) was still >or=90 mm Hg, the dosage was doubled for another 4 weeks; for those subjects whose SeDBP was <90 mm Hg after 4-week treatment, the initial dosage remained unchanged and the treatment continued until completion of the study.

RESULTS(1) The mean trough reduction in SeDBP from baseline in olmesartan group was significantly greater than that in losartan group after 4 weeks (11.72 mm Hg vs 9.23 mm Hg, P=0.004) and 8 weeks treatment (12.94 mm Hg vs 11.01 mm Hg, P=0.035). (2) The number and percentage of responders in olmesartan group (81, 65.3%) were statistically higher than those (68, 52.7%) in losartan group (P=0.028) after 4 weeks treatment and were similar between the two groups after 8 weeks treatment (P>0.05). (3) Individual and overall trough/peak ratios of DBP and SBP in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were higher in olmesartan group than losartan group. The hypotensive effect of olmesartan was more durable than losartan at 24 hour interval. (4) The incidence of study drug-related adverse events (AEs) in olmesartan group (10.5%) was similar as that in losartan group (13.9%, P>0.05). Most of these AEs were mild and transient.

CONCLUSIONThis study shows that olmesartan medoxomil, at oral dose of 20 mg-40 mg once daily was effective and safe for hypertension treatment and the hypotensive effect was superior to losartan potassium (50 mg-100 mg once daily).

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Antihypertensive Agents ; administration & dosage ; China ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension ; drug therapy ; physiopathology ; Imidazoles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Losartan ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Olmesartan Medoxomil ; Tetrazoles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo compare the effects of valsartan combined with amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide regimen on blood pressure variation and plasma nitric oxide (NO) and endothelin (ET) in elderly hypertensive patients.

METHODSA total of 61 elderly patients with grade 2 or 3 hypertension were randomized into valsartan + amlodipine (the amlodipine group, n = 31) or valsartan + hydrochlorothiazide (the hydrochlorothiazide group, n = 30) group. Blood lipids, fasting plasma glucose and uric acid were determined before the treatment. 24-hour dynamic blood pressure, NO and ET were monitored at baseline, 8 and 16 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS24 hours blood pressure and daytime blood pressure were similar between two groups at all 3 time points. At 16 weeks, morning systolic blood pressure surge was significantly lower in amlodipine group than in hydrochlorothiazide group [(22.6 ± 8.8) mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) vs. (26.3 ± 13.7) mm Hg, P < 0.05]. 24 hours systolic blood pressure variability (SBPV) decreased progressively in both groups [the amlodipine group: (12.5 ± 2.8) mm Hg vs. (10.2 ± 2.2) mm Hg vs. (8.8 ± 1.6) mm Hg, P < 0.01; the hydrochlorothiazide group: (12.5 ± 2.5) mm Hg vs. (10.7 ± 2.2) mm Hg vs. (9.6 ± 2.0) mm Hg, P < 0.01]. Daytime SBPV also decreased progressively in both groups [the amlodipine group: (12.2 ± 3.0) mm Hg vs. (10.1 ± 2.3) mm Hg vs. (8.4 ± 1.9) mm Hg, P < 0.01; the hydrochlorothiazide group: (11.8 ± 2.7) mm Hg vs. (10.4 ± 1.9) mm Hg vs. (9.6 ± 2.2) mm Hg, P < 0.01]. 24 hours diastolic blood pressure variability (DBPV) was significantly reduced post therapy in the amlodipine group [(15.5 ± 3.4) mm Hg vs. (13.0 ± 3.5) mm Hg vs. (12.3 ± 2.5), P < 0.01] but not in the hydrochlorothiazide group. NO increased progressively [(27.3 ± 13.6) µmol/L vs. (47.2 ± 16.3) µmol/L vs. (69.5 ± 18.9) µmol/L in the amlodipine group, P < 0.01; (33.5 ± 13.9) µmol/L vs. (49.7 ± 21.9) µmol/L vs. (66.7 ± 24.7) µmol/L in the hydrochlorothiazide group, P < 0.01] and ET decreased progressively [(45.3 ± 8.0) ng/L vs. (37.4 ± 3.9) ng/L vs. (34.2 ± 4.4) ng/L in the amlodipine group, P < 0.01; (46.6 ± 10.4) ng/L vs. (37.0 ± 5.4) ng/L vs. (36.1 ± 8.2) ng/L in the hydrochlorothiazide group, P < 0.01] in both groups.

CONCLUSIONValsartan in combination with amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide can both effectively lower BPV in elderly hypertensive patients and improve the vascular endothelial function and the former regimen is more suitable for elderly hypertensive patients.

Aged ; Amlodipine ; therapeutic use ; Blood Pressure ; drug effects ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Hydrochlorothiazide ; therapeutic use ; Hypertension ; drug therapy ; physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Tetrazoles ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Valine ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Valsartan

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of a once daily valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg combination tablet in Chinese mild to moderate hypertensive patients without adequate blood pressure control by monotherapy.

METHODSTwo multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double dummy, active-controlled, parallel group trials were conducted. After a washout period (no medication) of 1-4 weeks, patients with Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) > or = 95 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) and < 110 mm Hg received a monotherapy of either Amlodipine 5 mg (in study 1) or valsartan 80 mg (in study 2) for 4 weeks. Patients with MSDBP > or = 90 mm Hg and < 110 mm Hg at the end of the monotherapy period were randomized to receive valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg treatment, or continue with the monotherapy.

RESULTSIn study 1, compared with amlodipine 5 mg, valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg once daily further reduced mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP)/MSDBP 4.4/3 mm Hg (P < 0.0001). In study 2, compared with valsartan 80 mg, valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg once daily further reduced MSSBP/MSDBP 6.4/4.2 mm Hg (P < 0.0001). The blood pressure (BP) control rates (BP < 140/90 mm Hg) of combination treatment group were 71.0% and 71.2% respectively, and significantly higher than the monotherapy groups in both trials. Incidence of adverse events was comparable in monotherapy and combination therapy groups.

CONCLUSIONOur results showed that valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg was superior to amlodipine 5 mg or valsartan 80 mg alone in lowering blood pressure and BP control in patients with mild to moderate hypertension not adequately controlled with amlodipine 5 mg or valsartan 80 mg monotherapy. No new or unexpected safety issues were identified with valsartan/amlodipine combination therapy compared with monotherapy.

Adult ; Amlodipine ; administration & dosage ; Antihypertensive Agents ; administration & dosage ; Blood Pressure ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension ; drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Tetrazoles ; administration & dosage ; Valine ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; Valsartan

AIMTo develop a new synthetic route for olmesartan medoxomil.

METHODSOlmesartan medoxomil was prepared from ethyl 4-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-2-propylimidazole-5-carboxylate via hydrolysis and lactonization to afford 4,4- dimethyl-2-propyl-4,6-dihydrofuro [3,4-d]-1H-imidazole-6-one which was condensed with 2-(triphenylmethyl)-5-[4'-(bromomethylbiphenyl)-2-yl] tetrazole, followed by esterification with 4-chloromethyl-5-methyl-1,3-dioxol-2-one, and deprotection. The chemical structure of the major impurity in condensation reaction is the regio-isomer in the imidazole moiety, and confirmed by single crystal X-ray diffraction. The corresponding regio-isomer of olmesartan medoxomil was synthesized from the impurity by similar method. Optimization of the condensation conditions reduced the impurity to a negligible quantity.

RESULTSSynthesis of olmesartan medoxomil by the new route gave a product of 60% yield and above 99.0% purity. The content of olmesartan medoxomil regio-isomer was effectively controlled to less than 0.1%.

CONCLUSIONA novel synthetic route for olmesartan medoxomil was developed successfully. The olmesartan medoxomil regio-isomer is reported for the first time.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers ; chemical synthesis ; chemistry ; Animals ; Antihypertensive Agents ; chemical synthesis ; chemistry ; pharmacology ; Blood Pressure ; drug effects ; Imidazoles ; chemical synthesis ; chemistry ; pharmacology ; Molecular Structure ; Olmesartan Medoxomil ; Rats ; Stereoisomerism ; Tetrazoles ; chemical synthesis ; chemistry ; pharmacology

OBJECTIVETo investigate the neointima formation and the expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in cuff-induced vascular injury in mouse model, and to examine the effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) blocker, olmesartan, on MCP-1 and TNF-alpha expression and consequently vascular remodeling.

METHODSVascular injury was induced by polyethylene cuff-placement around the mouse femoral artery. Some mice were treated with AT1 receptor blocker, olmesartan, at the dose of 3 mg.kg(-1).day(-1) with an osmotic minipump. Neointima formation and the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were measured by morphometric analysis and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation. MCP-1 and TNF-alpha expression was detected by Western blot and immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTSWe observed neointima formation 14 days after cuff placement as well as VSMCs proliferation in the media and neointima. Cuff placement also induced MCP-1 and TNF-alpha expression in the media and neointima that the VSMCs specifically existed. Treatment of mice with olmesartan at a dose of 3 mg.kg(-1).day(-1), which did not influence systolic blood pressure, significantly decreased neointima formation and the proliferation of VSMCs. Olmesartan also inhibited MCP-1 and TNF-alpha expression in the injured arteries.

CONCLUSIONSOur results demonstrate that blockade of AT1 receptor inhibits MCP-1 and TNF-alpha expression and thereby improves vascular remodeling.

Analysis of Variance ; Animals ; Blotting, Western ; Cell Division ; drug effects ; physiology ; Cells, Cultured ; Chemokine CCL2 ; analysis ; Disease Models, Animal ; Imidazoles ; pharmacology ; Immunohistochemistry ; Male ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Monocytes ; cytology ; drug effects ; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular ; cytology ; drug effects ; Neovascularization, Physiologic ; drug effects ; physiology ; Olmesartan Medoxomil ; Probability ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tetrazoles ; pharmacology ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha ; analysis ; drug effects ; Tunica Intima ; drug effects ; pathology ; Vascular Diseases ; physiopathology

No abstract available.
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Tetrazoles ; Valine ; Ventricular Function, Left ; Valsartan

PURPOSE: It remains controversial how to treat the IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients with proteinuria <1g/day. We investigated effects of single or combined use of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and steroid on proteinuria reduction and renal protection in IgAN patients with normal renal function and urine protein/creatinine ratio (PCR) < or =1 g/g. METHODS: Oral prednisolone was given at an initial dose of 1 mg/kg every day for 2 months and then gradually tapered for 4 months. An ARB irbesartan or losartan or valsartan was given until the end of follow-up. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up period of about 40 mo, the urine PCR decreased from 0.64+/-0.29 g/g to 0.32+/-0.31 g/g in the combination group (n=26) (p<0.05). But in ARB (n=17) and steroid groups (n=20), it decreased from 0.56+/-0.26 g/g to 0.54+/-0.45 g/g and from 0.50+/-0.26 g/g to 0.34+/-0.32 g/g, respectively, while there were no statistical significances. Serum creatinine decreased from 0.83+/-0.13 mg/dL to 0.73+/-0.14 mg/dL in steroid group (p<0.01), and from 0.92+/-0.17 mg/dL to 0.81+/-0.23 mg/dL in combination group (p<0.01). But in ARB group, no statistical significance was noticed. All patients achieved the BP goal < or =130/80 mmHg by adding anti-hypertensive drugs, if necessary. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that (steroid or) combination therapy reduced proteinuria and improved renal function in the patients with proteinuria < or =1 g/g. Further prospective controlled studies are required to clarify the effect of steroid over the long term.
Angiotensin II ; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers ; Angiotensins ; Antihypertensive Agents ; Biphenyl Compounds ; Creatinine ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glomerulonephritis ; Glomerulonephritis, IGA ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin A ; Losartan ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Prednisolone ; Proteinuria ; Receptors, Angiotensin ; Retrospective Studies ; Tetrazoles ; Valine ; Valsartan

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) have beneficial effects on cardiovascular, metabolic, and inflammatory parameters in addition to controlling blood pressure (BP). However, few comparative clinical studies have been conducted with different ARBs. We compared these effects in patients with uncomplicated hypertension who were receiving telmisartan or valsartan. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were patients with essential hypertension (48.4+/-9.6 years) who were randomly assigned to take either telmisartan (80 mg/day, n=30) or valsartan (160 mg/day, n=30) for 12 weeks. Their anthropometric, laboratory, vascular, and echocardiographic data were measured at baseline and at the end of the study. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups, except for the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV; telmisartan group vs. valsartan group; 841.2+/-131.0 vs. 761.1+/-104.4 cm/s, p<0.05). After 12 weeks, BP had fallen to a similar extent with mean reductions in the systolic and diastolic BP of 20.7+/-18.1 and 16.3+/-13.0 mm Hg (p<0.001, respectively) for the telmisartan and 22.5+/-17.0 and 16.8+/-9.3 mm Hg (p<0.001, respectively) for the valsartan group. Although the cfPWV and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) fell significantly only with the administration of telmisartan, they were not significantly different when baseline cfPWV was considered. The differences in the cfPWV and LVMI changes from baseline between the two groups were also not significant after adjusting for baseline cfPWV. No significant changes in other vascular, metabolic, or inflammatory parameters were observed with either treatment. CONCLUSION: The effects of a 12-week treatment with the two ARBs, telmisartan and valsartan, on cardiovascular, metabolic, and inflammatory parameters were not different in patients with uncomplicated hypertension.
Benzimidazoles ; Benzoates ; Blood Pressure ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Pulse Wave Analysis ; Tetrazoles ; Valine ; Valsartan

No abstract available.
Benzimidazoles ; Blood Pressure ; Stroke ; Tetrazoles