OBJECTIVETo investigate the impact of antihypertensive medication timing on degree and stability of blood pressure (BP) lowering in patients with moderate and severe essential hypertension.

METHODSNinety patients were randomly assigned to take Valsartan and Felodiping together in the morning (group A), Valsartan in the morning and Felodiping in the evening (group B) or Felodiping in the morning and Valsartan in the evening (group C, n = 30 each). The morning dosage was titrated if the goal blood pressure was not achieved. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed on the first and 14(th) day of medication.

RESULTSThe BP reductions during nighttime and twenty-four in group B and C hours were similar (P > 0.05) but were significant more than those in group A (P < 0.05). The smoothness indexes of mean systolic, mean arterial blood pressure during nighttime and twenty-four in group B and C were similar but significantly higher than that in group A (P < 0.05). The smoothness index of diastolic pressure at nighttime in group B and C was similar but significantly higher than that in group A (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONMore significant and stable antihypertensive effects could be achieved by taking the two antihypertensive medications separately in the morning and at evening compared that taken the two drugs together in the morning.

Antihypertensive Agents ; administration & dosage ; Blood Pressure ; drug effects ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Felodipine ; administration & dosage ; Humans ; Hypertension ; drug therapy ; Tetrazoles ; administration & dosage ; Valine ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; Valsartan

BACKGROUNDThe combination of cilostazol, aspirin and clopidogrel (triple antiplatelet therapy, TAT) after a percutaneous coronary intervention has been used as an alternative therapy. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAT for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODSWe systematically searched Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) with and without cilostazol after PCI. All analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.0.

RESULTSThe final analysis consisted of 4474 patients from ten studies. The combined results suggested that there was a lower risk of cardiac death (relative risk (RR) = 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31 - 0.98, P < 0.05) and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.54 - 0.74, P < 0.05) in patients treated with TAT as compared to those with DAT follow-ups after six months to one year; no significant difference was observed in bleeding and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.80 - 1.64, P > 0.05; RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.42 - 1.83, P > 0.05). However, the rate of adverse drug reaction was higher in patients receiving TAT than in patients receiving DAT (RR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.84 - 2.66, P < 0.05). Moreover, there was a lower risk of stent thrombosis in patients treated with TAT as compared to those treated with DAT (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21 - 0.94, P < 0.05). The TAT group had a reduced risk of target lesion revascularization (TLR) (RR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43 - 0.82, P = 0.001) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) than the DAT group (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.45 - 0.71, P < 0.05). The number of MACEs was lower for patients in the TAT group than in the DAT group with diabetes mellitus sub-analysis (RR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28 - 0.61, P < 0.05). But no significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding MACEs in patients with drug-eluting stent implantations (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.65 - 1.03, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONTAT could significantly reduce the rates of MACEs and cardiac death in comparison to DAT, but more attention should be paid to adverse side effects of the drugs.

Aspirin ; administration & dosage ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Publication Bias ; Stents ; adverse effects ; Tetrazoles ; administration & dosage ; Ticlopidine ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of a once daily valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg combination tablet in Chinese mild to moderate hypertensive patients without adequate blood pressure control by monotherapy.

METHODSTwo multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double dummy, active-controlled, parallel group trials were conducted. After a washout period (no medication) of 1-4 weeks, patients with Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) > or = 95 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) and < 110 mm Hg received a monotherapy of either Amlodipine 5 mg (in study 1) or valsartan 80 mg (in study 2) for 4 weeks. Patients with MSDBP > or = 90 mm Hg and < 110 mm Hg at the end of the monotherapy period were randomized to receive valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg treatment, or continue with the monotherapy.

RESULTSIn study 1, compared with amlodipine 5 mg, valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg once daily further reduced mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP)/MSDBP 4.4/3 mm Hg (P < 0.0001). In study 2, compared with valsartan 80 mg, valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg once daily further reduced MSSBP/MSDBP 6.4/4.2 mm Hg (P < 0.0001). The blood pressure (BP) control rates (BP < 140/90 mm Hg) of combination treatment group were 71.0% and 71.2% respectively, and significantly higher than the monotherapy groups in both trials. Incidence of adverse events was comparable in monotherapy and combination therapy groups.

CONCLUSIONOur results showed that valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg was superior to amlodipine 5 mg or valsartan 80 mg alone in lowering blood pressure and BP control in patients with mild to moderate hypertension not adequately controlled with amlodipine 5 mg or valsartan 80 mg monotherapy. No new or unexpected safety issues were identified with valsartan/amlodipine combination therapy compared with monotherapy.

Adult ; Amlodipine ; administration & dosage ; Antihypertensive Agents ; administration & dosage ; Blood Pressure ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension ; drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Tetrazoles ; administration & dosage ; Valine ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; Valsartan

BACKGROUND: Smoking is one of well known environmental factors causing endothelial dysfunction and plays important role in the atherosclerosis. We investigated the effect of cilostazol could improve the endothelial dysfunction in smokers with the measurement of flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). METHODS: We enrolled 10 normal healthy male persons and 20 male smokers without any known cardiovascular diseases. After measurement of baseline FMD, the participants were medicated with oral cilostazol 100 mg bid for two weeks. We checked the follow up FMD after two weeks and compared these values between two groups. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference of baseline characteristics including age, body mass index, serum cholesterol profiles, serum glucose and high sensitive C-reactive protein between two groups. However, the control group showed significantly higher baseline endothelium-dependent dilatation (EDD) after reactive hyperemia (12.0 +/- 4.5% in the control group vs. 8.0 +/- 2.1% in the smoker group, p = 0.001). However, endothelium-independent dilatation (EID) after sublingual administration of nitroglycerin was similar between the two groups (13.6 +/- 4.5% in the control group vs. 11.9 +/- 4.9% in the smoker group, p = 0.681). Two of the smoker group were dropped out due to severe headache. After two weeks of cilostazol therapy, follow-up EDD were significantly increased in two groups (12.0 +/- 4.5% to 16.1 +/- 3.7%, p = 0.034 in the control group and 8.0 +/- 2.1% to 12.2 +/- 5.1%, p = 0.003 in the smoker group, respectively). However, follow up EID value was not significantly increased compared with baseline value in both groups (13.6 +/- 4.5% to 16.1 +/- 3.7%, p = 0.182 in the control group and 11.9 +/- 4.9% to 13.7 +/- 4.3%, p = 0.430 in the smoker group, respectively). CONCLUSION: Oral cilostazol treatment significantly increased the vasodilatory response to reactive hyperemia in two groups. It can be used to improve endothelial function in the patients with endothelial dysfunction caused by cigarette smoking.
Administration, Sublingual ; Atherosclerosis ; Body Mass Index ; C-Reactive Protein ; Cardiovascular Diseases ; Cholesterol ; Dilatation ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glucose ; Headache ; Humans ; Hyperemia ; Male ; Nitroglycerin ; Smoke ; Smoking ; Tetrazoles

In this study, the synergistic effect of 6-[4-(1-cyclohexyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl) butoxy]-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone (cilostazol) and Ginkgo biloba extract (GbE) was examined in apolipoprotein E (ApoE) null mice. Co-treatment with GbE and cilostazol synergistically decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in ApoE null mice fed a high-fat diet. Co-treatment resulted in a significantly decreased atherosclerotic lesion area compared to untreated ApoE mice. The inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules such as monocyte chemoattractant-1 (MCP-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), and VCAM-1 which can initiate atherosclerosis were significantly reduced by the co-treatment of cilostazol with GbE. Further, the infiltration of macrophages into the intima was decreased by co-treatment. These results suggest that co-treatment of GbE with cilostazol has a more potent anti-atherosclerotic effect than treatment with cilostazol alone in hyperlipidemic ApoE null mice and could be a valuable therapeutic strategy for the treatment of atherosclerosis.
Animals ; Apolipoproteins E/genetics/physiology ; Atherosclerosis/*drug therapy ; Cytokines/metabolism ; Disease Models, Animal ; Drug Synergism ; Ginkgo biloba/*chemistry ; Humans ; Macrophages/cytology/drug effects ; Male ; Mice ; Mice, Nude ; Plant Extracts/*administration & dosage/chemistry ; Reactive Oxygen Species/*metabolism ; Tetrazoles/*administration & dosage

PURPOSE: It is unknown whether cilostazol pretreatment reduces postprocedural myonecrosis (PPMN). Cilostazol pretreatment reduces PPMN after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with stable angina scheduled for elective PCI were randomly assigned to a 7-day pretreatment with Cilostazol (200 mg/day) or to a control group. Creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels were measured at baseline and at 6 and 24 hours after PCI. The primary end-point was the occurrence of PPMN, defined as any CK-MB elevation above the upper normal limit (UNL). Aspirin and clopidogrel were co-administered for 7 days before PCI, and resistance to these agents was then assayed using the VerifyNow System. RESULTS: There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the final analyzable cilostazol (n=54) and the control group (n=56). Despite a significantly greater % inhibition of clopidogrel in the cilostazol group (39+/-23% versus 25+/-22%, p=0.003), the incidence of PPMN was similar between the cilostazol group (24%) and the control group (25%, p=1.000). The rate of CK-MB elevation at > or =3 times UNL was also similar between the two groups (6% versus 5%, p=0.583). The incidence of cTnI increase over the UNL or to 3 times the UNL was not different between the two groups. There was no significant difference in terms of the rate of adverse events during follow-up, although the cilostazol group showed a tendency to have a slightly higher incidence of entry site hematoma. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated that adjunctive cilostazol pretreatment might not significantly reduce PPMN after elective PCI in patients with stable angina.
Aged ; Angina, Stable/drug therapy/enzymology/therapy ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/*adverse effects ; Creatine Kinase, MB Form/blood ; Female ; Heart Injuries/etiology/prevention & control ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardium/pathology ; Necrosis ; Phosphodiesterase 3 Inhibitors/*administration & dosage ; Prospective Studies ; Tetrazoles/*administration & dosage

OBJECTIVETo investigate the protective effect of cilostazol administrated intranasally on chronic injury after focal cerebral ischemia in mice.

METHODSFocal cerebral ischemia in mice was induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Cilostazol was administrated intranasally or intraperitoneally 1 h, 4 h and 7 h after the operation; then twice a day from the second day for 2 weeks. The neurological deficit scoring and the inclined board testing were performed within 35 d after ischemia. The survival rate, infarct volume and neuron density were assessed 35 d after ischemia.

RESULTIntranasal cilostazol at 0.3 mg/kg increased the survival rate. Intranasal cilostazol (0.3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg) and intraperitoneal cilostazol (10 mg/kg) significantly attenuated neurological deficit, reduced infarct volume, and increased the survival neuron density in the border of ischemia region.

CONCLUSIONCilostazol administered intranasally demonstrates protective effects on chronic cerebral ischemia in mice.

Administration, Intranasal ; Animals ; Brain ; drug effects ; pathology ; Brain Ischemia ; drug therapy ; pathology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery ; drug therapy ; pathology ; Male ; Mice ; Neurons ; drug effects ; pathology ; Tetrazoles ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use

BACKGROUND: Dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has emerged as the gold standard therapy for patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES). However, there is variability in patients' responses to this antiplatelet therapy, and some patients continue to show ischemic recurrences after therapy. The purpose of the study was to compare the simultaneously obtained results of various platelet-function tests for assessing the prevalence of antiplatelet resistance in coronary artery disease patients undergoing DES therapy. METHODS: A total of 66 patients were administered a loading dose of aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol at least 12 hr before stenting. The results of VerifyNow (Accumetrics, USA), multiplate analyzer (Dynabyte Medical, Germany), and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein/P2Y12 (Biocytex, France) assays were compared with those of light transmission aggregometry (LTA) analysis. RESULTS: The P2Y12 reaction units and P2Y12% inhibition values obtained using the VerifyNow assay showed strong correlation (r) with the results of the LTA analysis. All tests results showed low concordance in defining the antiplatelet resistance in patients, and the degrees of agreement were as follows: 0 for aspirin reaction units; 0.25, P2Y12% inhibition; 0, aspirin-sensitive patients' identification test; 0.21, ADPtest; and 0.14, platelet reactivity index, expressed as the kappa statistics. The prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistances in patients resulted in remarkable variations, from 0% to 22.7% and from 9.1% to 48.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical usefulness of the different assays for the correct classification of patients in terms of antiplatelet resistance remains unclear. Further studies are required to determine the best method for correlating the occurrences of adverse ischemic events.
Aged ; Aspirin/*administration & dosage ; Coronary Artery Disease/*drug therapy ; Drug Resistance ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Drug-Eluting Stents ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Platelet Aggregation/drug effects ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/*administration & dosage ; Platelet Function Tests ; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage ; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12/metabolism ; Tetrazoles/administration & dosage ; Ticlopidine/administration & dosage/*analogs & derivatives

BACKGROUNDCongestive heart failure (CHF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) is the cornerstone in its treatment. However, CHF continues to progress despite this therapy, perhaps because of production of angiotensin II (Ang II) by alternative pathways. The present study was conducted to examine the combined effects of a chronic ACEI, ramipril, and a chronic Ang II type 1 receptor blocker, TCV116, on rat CHF after myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODSCongestive heart failure was caused by MI in rats, which was induced by ligating the left anterior descending coronary artery. The experiment protocol included sham-operated rats (Sham), MI-control rats (MI-control), MI rats treated with ramipril 3 mg/kg (MI-ramipril) or TCV116 2 mg/kg (MI-TCV116) per day, half dosage (MI-1/2R&T) or full dosage (MI-R&T) combination of the two. At 22 weeks, cardiac hemodynamic parameters such as mean arterial pressure (MAP), left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP), maximal rate of left ventricule pressure development and decline (LV dP/dtmax) and left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP), and cardiac morphometric parameters such as heart weight (HW), left ventricular weight (LVW) and left ventricular cavity area (LVCA) were measured, mRNA expressions of cardiac molecule genes such as beta myosin heavy chain (betaMHC), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1), collagen I and III were quantified with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in the surviving septum myocardium, and survival rates were calculated.

RESULTSThere were no significant differences in MI sizes (%) among each MI related experimental groups (33 +/- 13, 34 +/- 14, 33 +/- 13, 35 +/- 13 and 33 +/- 14 for MI-control, MI-ramipril, MI-TCV116, MI-1/2R&T and MI-R&T, respectively, no statistical significance for all). Compared with sham-operated rats, MI rats without therapy showed significant increases in morphometric parameters as well as in mRNA expressions of cardiac molecule genes (P < 0.01); while their hemodynamic parameters were significantly impaired (P < 0.01), and in terms of spontaneous deaths survival rate shortened (P < 0.05). Compared with MI rats without therapy, MI rats treated with each single drug showed significant attenuation of mRNA expressions of cardiac molecule genes (P < 0.01); while their hemodynamic parameters were significantly improved (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01), and in terms of spontaneous deaths survival rate prolonged (P < 0.05). Both half and full dosage combined treatments exerted more powerful effects on improvement of cardiac phenotypic changes and on attenuation of betaMHC, BNP mRNA expressions (P < 0.05 vs monotherapy); while LVEDP was further lowered (P < 0.05 vs monotherapy). However, the total death in MI rats with full dosage combined treatment was more though there were no significant differences when compared with other treatments.

CONCLUSIONSThe results suggest that treatment with appropriate dosage combination of a chronic ACEI and a chronic ARB may further improve cardiac remodeling and cardiac function after MI.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; administration & dosage ; Animals ; Benzimidazoles ; administration & dosage ; Biphenyl Compounds ; administration & dosage ; Blood Pressure ; drug effects ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Heart Failure ; drug therapy ; pathology ; physiopathology ; Male ; Myocardial Infarction ; complications ; Myocardium ; pathology ; Ramipril ; administration & dosage ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 1 ; drug effects ; Tetrazoles ; administration & dosage ; Ventricular Function, Left ; drug effects

PURPOSE: Whether addition of cilostazol is superior to increasing dose of clopidogrel in patients with hyporesponsiveness to chronic clopidogrel therapy is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 73 patients with hyporesponsiveness to clopidogrel on standard dual antiplatelet therapy for more than 2 weeks. Clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness was defined as percent inhibition of P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) <30% on VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Patients were randomly assigned to increased dose of clopidogrel (aspirin 100 mg+clopidogrel 150 mg daily: group A, n=38) or to receiving additional cilostazol (aspirin 100 mg+clopidogrel 75 mg+cilostazol 100 mg bid daily: group B, n=35). RESULTS: Baseline percent inhibition of PRU and PRU was similar between 2 groups (13.0+/-10.2% versus 11.8+/-9.7%, p=0.61, and 286.3+/-54.7 versus 295.7+/-53.7, p=0.44, respectively). At follow-up, percent inhibition of PRU was higher and PRU was lower significantly in group B than in group A (38.5+/-17.9% versus 28.3+/-16.6%, p=0.02, and 207.3+/-68.2 versus 241.3+/-76.7, p=0.050, respectively). Among those still showing hyporesponsiveness to clopidogrel at follow-up (21 patients in group A, 10 patients in group B), 12 patients completed further crossover study. Compared to the baseline, magnitude of change in percent inhibition of PRU and PRU showed an improved tendency after the crossover (from 2.7+/-8.7% to 15.8+/-18.4%, p=0.08, and from -18.6+/-58.0 to -61.9+/-84.3, p=0.08). CONCLUSION: Adjunctive cilostazol improved clopidogrel responsiveness better than the higher maintenance dose of clopidogrel in hyporesponsive patients with chronic clopidogrel therapy.
Adult ; Aged ; Blood Platelets/drug effects ; Cross-Over Studies ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/*administration & dosage ; Prospective Studies ; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12/metabolism ; Tetrazoles/*administration & dosage ; Thrombosis/drug therapy ; Ticlopidine/administration & dosage/*analogs & derivatives ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome