1.How different is the once-weekly teriparatide from the daily one or the same?
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2019;5(2):27-28
No abstract available.
Teriparatide
2.The role of teriparatide in the management of fracture non-union: A systematic review of case reports
Ervin Chino N TAYAG ; Charles Abraham C VILLAMIN
Journal of Medicine University of Santo Tomas 2020;4(2):532-540
Teriparatide has been known to aid in the treatment
of osteoporosis but its use in the management of
fracture disorders is poorly documented. This review
aims to show that teriparatide administration may
improve the healing process in fractures that fail to
unite after sustaining trauma. A total of 22 reported cases have been identifi ed from 2009 to 2017.
Teriparatide doses were given in a median duration
of 5.6 months with a median time to complete union
of 8.5 months. This review systematically summarizes all clinical case reports of non-union treated with
teriparatide for us to gain insight into its off-label use.
Teriparatide
3.Treatment of Osteoporosis: Unmet Needs and Emerging Solutions.
Bente Lomholt LANGDAHL ; Jane Dahl ANDERSEN
Journal of Bone Metabolism 2018;25(3):133-140
Efficient therapies are available for the treatment of osteoporosis, however, there are still unmet needs. Anti-resorptive therapies only increase bone mineral density to a certain extent and reduce the risk of non-vertebral fractures by 20%, only one anabolic option is available in most parts of the world-the effect of which levels off over time, and the evidence for combination therapy targeting both resorption and formation is limited. In addition, identification and treatment of patients with high and imminent fracture risk following a recent fracture and long-term adherence to treatment are 2 other very prominent challenges to the management of osteoporosis. The current review will focus on emerging osteoporosis treatments and optimized use of the existing treatments that may help overcome the currently unmet needs in the management of osteoporosis.
Bone Density
;
Humans
;
Osteoporosis*
;
Teriparatide
4.Atypical Femoral Fractures: What Do We Know about Them?
Beom Seok LEE ; Young Kyun LEE ; Heejae WON ; Hyungkook KIM ; Kyung Hoi KOO
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society 2018;31(4):159-164
Recently, atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) have been found in patients who were prescribed bisphosphonate to prevent osteoporotic fractures. Although the occurrence of AFF is rare, there are some concerns, such as a higher risk of delayed or non-union of AFF. This paper reviews the treatment of AFF and suggests some considerations during surgery.
Femoral Fractures
;
Humans
;
Osteoporosis
;
Osteoporotic Fractures
;
Teriparatide
5.Utility of radius bone densitometry for the treatment of osteoporosis with once-weekly teriparatide therapy
Harumi NAKAYAMA ; Hiroyuki TOHO ; Teruki SONE
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2018;4(1):29-32
OBJECTIVES: As clinics that treat patients with osteoporosis do not usually have central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), bone density is often measured with radial DXA. However, no long-term evidence exists for radius bone density outcomes following treatment with once-weekly teriparatide in actual medical treatment. METHODS: We evaluated changes in bone density at 6-, 12-, and 18-month intervals using radial DXA in patients treated with once-weekly teriparatide for more than 6 months. RESULTS: A significant increase in bone mineral density (BMD) was observed at the 1/3 and 1/10 radius sites 12 months after the initiation of once-weekly teriparatide. We also observed that the rate of change in BMD was greater at the distal 1/10 radius than at the 1/3 radius. CONCLUSIONS: Considering these points, the effect of once-weekly teriparatide therapy can be observed at the radius. In clinics that do not have central DXA, but instead have radial DXA, these findings can help to evaluate the effect of once-weekly teriparatide treatment on osteoporosis.
Absorptiometry, Photon
;
Bone Density
;
Densitometry
;
Humans
;
Osteoporosis
;
Radius
;
Teriparatide
6.More than 6 Months of Teriparatide Treatment Was More Effective for Bone Union than Shorter Treatment Following Lumbar Posterolateral Fusion Surgery.
Seiji OHTORI ; Sumihisa ORITA ; Kazuyo YAMAUCHI ; Yawara EGUCHI ; Nobuyasu OCHIAI ; Kazuki KUNIYOSHI ; Yasuchika AOKI ; Junichi NAKAMURA ; Masayuki MIYAGI ; Miyako SUZUKI ; Gou KUBOTA ; Kazuhide INAGE ; Takeshi SAINOH ; Jun SATO ; Yasuhiro SHIGA ; Koki ABE ; Kazuki FUJIMOTO ; Hiroto KANAMOTO ; Gen INOUE ; Kazuhisa TAKAHASHI
Asian Spine Journal 2015;9(4):573-580
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PURPOSE: To examine the most effective duration of teriparatide use for spinal fusion in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: We reported that daily subcutaneous injection of teriparatide (parathyroid hormone) significantly improved bone union after instrumented lumbar posterolateral fusion (PLF) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis when compared with oral administration of bisphosphonate. However, the most effective duration of teriparatide use for spinal fusion has not been explored. METHODS: Forty-five women with osteoporosis diagnosed with degenerative spondylolisthesis from one of the three treatment groups were evaluated based on: short-duration treatment (average, 5.5 months; n=15; daily subcutaneous injection of 20 microg teriparatide), long-duration treatment (average, 13.0 months; n=15; daily subcutaneous injection of 20 microg teriparatide), and bisphosphonate treatment (average, 13.0 months; n=15; weekly oral administration of 17.5 mg risedronate). All patients underwent PLF with a local bone graft. Fusion rate and duration of bone union were evaluated 1.5 years after surgery. RESULTS: Bone union rate and average duration for bone union were 92% and 7.5 months in the long-duration treatment group, 80% and 8.5 months in the short-duration treatment group, and 70% and 10.0 months in the bisphosphonate treatment group, respectively. Results of bone union rate and average duration for bone union in the teriparatide treatment groups were significantly superior to those in the bisphosphonate treatment group (p<0.05); whereas, significantly superior results were observed in long-duration treatment group when compared with short-duration treatment group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Daily injection of teriparatide for bone union was more effective than oral administration of bisphosphonate. Furthermore, a longer period of teriparatide treatment for bone union was more effective than a shorter period of same treatment.
Administration, Oral
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Injections, Subcutaneous
;
Osteoporosis
;
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Spinal Fusion
;
Spondylolisthesis
;
Teriparatide*
;
Transplants
7.Unusual Excessive Callus Formation in the Intertrochanteric Fracture Treated with Teriparatide.
Young Soo SHIN ; Ha Joon JUNG ; Abhijit Prakash SAVALE ; Seung Beom HAN
Hip & Pelvis 2014;26(1):41-44
This is the first case report on the effects of teriparatide on the course of healing of an intertrochanteric hip fracture with unusually excessive callus formation even after discontinuation of treatment in an elderly woman. This case highlights the long-term effects of parathyroid hormone, even after administration of short-term, intermittent dosages for healing of osteoporotic fracture.
Aged
;
Bony Callus*
;
Female
;
Hip
;
Humans
;
Osteoporotic Fractures
;
Parathyroid Hormone
;
Teriparatide*
8.Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis.
Korean Journal of Medicine 2017;92(2):142-149
Osteoporosis is a common adverse event among patients on glucocorticoid therapy. Glucocorticoids reduce bone formation and increase cortical porosity in proportion to the dose and duration of glucocorticoid use. While the epidemiology of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis has been well characterized, its pathophysiology and effective management remain unclear. Several recommendations for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis are used to determine which patients on long-term glucocorticoid treatment to treat and when. The fracture risk can be assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool algorithm, along with other clinical factors. The management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis includes anti-osteoporotic therapy and measures to prevent bone loss. Bisphosphonates are currently the first choice treatment, with teriparatide and denosumab being alternatives.
Absorptiometry, Photon
;
Bone Density
;
Denosumab
;
Diphosphonates
;
Epidemiology
;
Glucocorticoids
;
Humans
;
Osteogenesis
;
Osteoporosis*
;
Porosity
;
Risk Assessment
;
Teriparatide
9.Change of the Halo Sign and the Grafted Bone according to the Usage of Teriparatide for the Correction Loss due to Screw Loosening after Corrective Osteotomy.
Ye Soo PARK ; Jae Hoon KIM ; Chang Hun LEE
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 2011;18(2):114-117
Among osteoporosis medications, Teriparatide is an agent that promotes bone formation and it seems to have an effect, due to an anabolic mechanism, in the early postoperative period after osteosynthesis or joint replacement. But to the best of our knowledge, the effect of teriparatide on pedicle screw loosening has not been previously reported. We report there on a case of pedicle screw loosening after corrective osteotomy in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis with osteoporosis, which was not improved by teriparatide, and we review the related literature.
Humans
;
Joints
;
Osteogenesis
;
Osteoporosis
;
Osteotomy
;
Postoperative Period
;
Spondylitis, Ankylosing
;
Teriparatide
;
Transplants
10.Effect of Teriparatide on Healing of Atypical Femoral Fractures: A Systemic Review.
Journal of Bone Metabolism 2015;22(4):183-189
BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates (BPs) are the most commonly used anti-osteoporotic drugs, which have been proven to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. However, use of BPs, particularly for long periods of time, is associated with an increased risk of atypical femoral fracture (AFF). Healing of BP-associated AFF is usually delayed because of suppressed bone turnover. Teriparatide (TPTD), a recombinant form of parathyroid hormone (PTH), enhances bone healing in patients with delayed healing or non-union. METHODS: In this study, we summarized and performed a systemic review of the published literature on treatment of AFF using TPTD. RESULTS: Although there is a lack of level 1 studies on the evidence of TPTD in promoting bone union in AFFs, this systemic review of the available literature revealed that TPTD works positively in AFFs, and we put together the evidence that TPTD is a viable treatment option for enhancing fracture healing in AFFs. CONCLUSIONS: While anecdotal evidence of beneficial effects of TPTD on fracture healing offer limited guidance for clinical decision making, a better understanding of the role of TPTD in fracture healing may be elucidated with future prospective trials.
Decision Making
;
Diphosphonates
;
Femoral Fractures*
;
Fracture Healing
;
Humans
;
Osteoporotic Fractures
;
Parathyroid Hormone
;
Prospective Studies
;
Teriparatide*