Objective: To screen the physical, psychological and behavioral factors related to patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) by using Axis Ⅱ assessment instruments of diagnostic criteria for TMD(DC/TMD). And to provide a reference to establish personalized diagnosis and treatment plans for TMD patients so as to prevent TMD and reduce predisposing factors. Methods: A total of 141 TMD patients, who were admitted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University from October 2018 to February 2021 were selected. There were 121 females and 20 males, with an average age of 30 years. A total of 90 healthy people were included as controls. A full-time psychologist conducted relevant questionnaire surveys. The questionnaires include general clinical survey forms and TMD symptom questionnaire. In addition, Axis Ⅱ assessment instruments include graded chronic pain scale, jaw functional limitation scale, oral behaviors checklist, patient health questionnaire-9 (depression), generalized anxiety disorder scale, patient health questionnaire-15 (physical symptoms), etc. The main observational indicators include: pain level, pain impact rates, overall classification of chronic pain, limited chewing function score, limited motor function score, limited communication function score, total jaw function restricted score, depression score, anxiety score, somatic symptom score and oral behavior score.The survey data were imported into SPSS 22.0 software for statistical analysis. Results: In the TMD group 60.3% (85/141) patients had various degrees of pain, 24.1% (34/141) of those with pain effect grades from 1 to 3 and 61.0% (86/141) showed chronic pain overall grades from Ⅰ to Ⅳ. The chewing function restricted score was 2.67(1.17, 4.25), motor function restricted score was 4.25(1.75, 6.12), communication function restricted score was 1.13(1.00, 2.25) and total jaw function restricted score was 2.56(1.47, 4.15) respectively. Patients with mild depression or above accounted for 59.6%(84/141), patients with mild anxiety or above accounted for 56.7%(80/141), 46.1%(65/141) patients had somatization symptoms. Statistical differences (P<0.05) were determined between TMD group and control group in various scores of jaw function, oral behavior grading, depression, anxiety, and physical symptoms. Physical symptoms had significantly statistical difference between different diagnostic classification(P<0.05). Meanwhile, among the different chronic pain levels in the TMD group, there were statistical differences in the various scales of mandibular dysfunction, depression, anxiety, and somatization. In the TMD group, other significant differences were noticed between males and females in terms of the average score of mouth opening, verbal and facial communication, the total score of mandibular dysfunction as well as physical symptoms (P<0.05). Conclusions: Compared with the healthy people, patients with TMD had more abnormal oral behaviors, different restriction of the mandibular functional activities. At the same time, depression, anxiety, and somatization were more serious. Patients with osteoarthritis and subluxation of temporomandibular joint were more likely to suffer physical symptoms. TMD patients suffering from pain had more severe mandibular dysfunction and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and somatization.
Adult ; Depression/diagnosis* ; Facial Pain ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mandible ; Somatoform Disorders ; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnosis* ; Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome

OBJECTIVETo study the methodological techniques in measuring the severity of temporomandibulr disorders (TMD) and in evaluating the effectiveness of therapies in clinic.

METHODSBoth Fricton's Craniomandibular Index (CMI) and Helkimo's Clinical Dysfunction Index were calculated from 60 TMD patients. Inter-rater reliability was tested to assess the consistency in use between different examiners. Fricton's CMI was used to assess the clinical improvement after accepting a treatment in 21 TMD patients diagnosed as acute disk displacement without reduction.

RESULTSCorrelation Coefficient for inter-rater reliability in two groups was 0.879 and 0.939 respectively for Fricton's CMI and 0.744 and 0.838 for Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index. Fricton's TMJ dysfunction index was decreased from 0.337 to 0.021 (P < 0.001) and Fricton's CMI was decreased from 0.185 to 0.011 (P < 0.001) after the treatment in 21 TMD patients with disk displacement without reduction.

CONCLUSIONSTo avoid using subjective and descriptive report in assessment of the severity of TMD and the effectiveness of therapies, Fricton's CMI is recommended as an objective criteria which is simple in clinical use, and ease in scoring.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Severity of Illness Index ; Temporomandibular Joint ; pathology ; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders ; pathology ; Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome ; pathology

Objective: To observe the different imaging manifestations of condylar sclerosis in temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis and explore the imaging significance of condylar sclerosis. Methods: From January 2018 to December 2020, 50 patients with temporomandibular joint condylar sclerosis were examined by cone-beam CT (CBCT) and underwent spiral CT, MRI and radionuclide bone imaging at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in General Hospital of Chinese PLA. There were 15 males and 35 females aged from 16 to 65 years with age of (42.7±14.5) years. The imaging manifestations of CBCT, spiral CT, MRI and radionuclide bone imaging, joint disc displacement and abnormal bone metabolism of condylar sclerosis were analyzed. And the area of condylar sclerosis was graded according to the image of CBCT. Results: A total of 50 patients were included, including 38 unilateral condylar sclerosis, 12 patients with bilateral condylar sclerosis, the total condylar sclerosis were 66. There was no significant difference between the detection rate of further spiral CT (95.5%, 63/66) and CBCT (100.0%, 66/66) (corrected χ²=1.36,P=0.244). The area of condylar sclerosis was (35.5±4.5) mm², ranged from 1 to 100 mm². In addition, spiral CT showed more clearly condylar sclerosis than CBCT. Sclerosis can occur in all parts of condyle, mainly in the upper middle region (68.2%,45/66) in coronal position and in the upper front region (71.2%,47/66) in sagittal position. Fifty-seven condylar sclerosis were detected by MRI, including 4(4/19) condylar sclerosis less than 4 mm². There was significant difference in the displacement of temporomandibular joint disc between the sclerotic side and the non sclerotic side (χ²=10.09, P=0.006). MRI display the condylar sclerosis showed low signal (56/62), followed by high signal (5/62) and medium signal (1/62). Radionuclide bone imaging showed that 4 of the 38 patients with unilateral condyle sclerosis had symmetrical bone metabolism, 34 had abnormal bone metabolism, and 21 patients had concentrated on the non-sclerotic side. Radionuclide bone imaging showed that 4 of the 38 patients with unilateral condyle sclerosis had symmetrical bone metabolism and 34 had abnormal bone metabolism. Conclusions: Spiral CT is more accurate than CBCT in terms of condyle sclerosis through different imaging analysis, and the detection rate of both is higher than MRI. Most of condylar sclerosis showed different degrees of low signal on MRI. The condylar sclerosis side is usually manifested by abnormal bone metabolism.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Mandibular Condyle/diagnostic imaging* ; Sclerosis/diagnostic imaging* ; Temporomandibular Joint/diagnostic imaging* ; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/etiology* ; Temporomandibular Joint Disc/diagnostic imaging* ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome ; Osteoarthritis/etiology* ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging

No abstract available.
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders*

No abstract available.
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

Headaches are one of the most common conditions associated with temporomandibular disorder (TMD). In the present paper, we evaluated the relationship between headache and TMD, determined whether headache influences the symptoms of TMD, and reported two cases of TMD accompanied by headache. Our practical experience and a review of the literature suggested that headache increases the frequency and intensity of pain parameters, thus complicating dysfunctional diseases in both diagnostic and treatment phases. Therefore, early and multidisciplinary treatment of TMD is necessary to avoid the overlap of painful events that could result in pain chronicity.
Headache* ; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders*

No abstract available.
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders*

No abstract available.
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders*

No abstract available.
Humans ; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders* ; Temporomandibular Joint*

Chondrocalcinosis ; Humans ; Temporomandibular Joint ; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders