1.A Case of Hypersensitivity Syndrome to Both Vancomycin and Teicoplanin.
Hyouk Soo KWON ; Yoon Seok CHANG ; Yi Yeong JEONG ; Sang Min LEE ; Woo Jung SONG ; Hong Bin KIM ; Yoon Keun KIM ; Sang Heon CHO ; You Young KIM ; Kyung Up MIN
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2006;21(6):1108-1110
Drug hypersensitivity syndrome to both vancomycin and teicoplanin has not been previously reported. We describe here a 50-yr-old male patient with vertebral osteomyelitis and epidural abscess who developed hypersensitivity syndrome to both vancomycin and teicoplanin. Skin rash, fever, eosinophilia, interstitial pneumonitis, and interstitial nephritis developed following the administration of each drug, and resolved after withdrawing the drugs and treating with high dose corticosteroids. The vertebral osteomyelitis was successfully treated with 6-week course of linezolid without further complications. Skin patch tests for vancomycin and teicoplanin was done 2 months after the recovery; a weak positive result for vancomycin (10% aq.,+at D2 and +at D4 with erythema and vesicles; ICDRG scale), and a doubtful result for teicoplanin (4% aq.-at D2 and+/-at D4 with macular erythema; ICDRG scale). We present this case to alert clinicians to the hypersensitivity syndrome that can result from vancomycin and teicoplanin, with possible cross-reactivity, which could potentially be life-threatening.
Vancomycin/*adverse effects
;
Teicoplanin/*adverse effects
;
Syndrome
;
Middle Aged
;
Male
;
Humans
;
Drug Hypersensitivity/*diagnosis/*etiology
;
Drug Combinations
2.Adverse drug reaction monitoring during antimicrobial therapy for septicemia patients at a university hospital in New Delhi.
Muhammad Shamshir ALAM ; Krishna Kolappa PILLAI ; Syed Aliul Hasan ABDI ; Prem KAPUR ; Paru Kutty PILLAI ; Kandasamy NAGARAJAN
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2018;33(6):1203-1209
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Adverse drug reaction (ADR) is an appreciably harmful or unpleasant reaction, resulting from an intervention related to the use of a medicinal product. The present study was conducted in order to monitor the frequency and severity of ADR during antimicrobial therapy of septicemia. METHODS: A prospective, observational, and noncomparative study was conducted over a period of 6 months on patients of septicemia admitted at a university hospital. Naranjo algorithm scale was used for causality assessment. Severity assessment was done by Hartwig severity scale. RESULTS: ADRs in selected hospitalized patients of septicemia was found to be in 26.5% of the study population. During the study period, 12 ADRs were confirmed occurring in 9, out of 34 admitted patients. Pediatric patients experienced maximum ADRs, 44.4%. Females experienced a significantly higher incidence of ADRs, 66.7%. According to Naranjo’s probability scale, 8.3% of ADRs were found to be definite, 58.3% as probable, and 33.3% as possible. A higher proportion of these ADRs, 66.7% were preventable in nature. Severity assessment showed that more than half of ADRs were moderate. Teicoplanin was found to be the commonest antimicrobial agent associated with ADRs, followed by gemifloxacin and ofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and severity of ADRs observed in the present study was substantially high indicating the need of extra vigilant during the antimicrobial therapy of septicemia.
Anti-Bacterial Agents
;
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions*
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Ofloxacin
;
Prospective Studies
;
Sepsis*
;
Teicoplanin
3.Retrospective analysis of the Gram-positive bacteria-infected cases in the Department of Hematology.
Yu JING ; Jian BO ; Yu ZHAO ; Hong-Hua LI ; Shu-Hong WANG ; Wen-Rong HUANG ; Quan-Shun WANG
Journal of Experimental Hematology 2013;21(5):1291-1295
This study was purposed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of linezolid, vancomycin and teicoplanin for the treatment of patients infected by Gram-positive bacteria in the Department of Hematology by retrospective analysis. The patients with fever in our department from January to December in 2011 were selected for blood culture with Gram-positive bacteria and treated with linezolid, vancomycin or teicoplanin alone.Various parameters were recorded before and after treatment, such as fever time, respiratory symptoms, physical signs, radiographic changes, blood and biochemical routine, and adverse reactions. The efficacy and safety of linezolid, vancomycin and teicoplanin were compared according to the fever abating time, bacterial clearance rate, clinical efficiencies and adverse events. The patients were divided into linezolid group (15 patients), vancomycin group (17 patients) and teicoplanin group (20 patients). The results showed that the mean time of fever abating in linezolid group was (4.43 ± 3.15)d, bacterial clearance rate and clinical efficiency in linezolid group were 55.56% and 86.67%, respectively. The above three data in vancomycin group were (6.83 ± 4.67)d, 54.54% and 76.47% respectively, and were (5.57 ± 4.16)d, 41.67% and 80.00% in teicoplanin group respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between three groups (P > 0.05). There were one case of diarrhea and two cases of thrombocytopenia in the linezolid group, and one case of nausea and two cases of creatinine increase in the vancomycin group. There were three cases of thrombocytopenia in the teicoplanin group. The thrombocytopenia in five cases and the hemogram drop in patients with leukemia after treatment were overlapped, their drug treatment did not stop, but their thrombocytopoiesis recovered to normal-level, thus the drug treatment were considered as no relation with thrombocytopenia. It is concluded that the treatment efficacy between linezolid, vancomycin and teicoplanin for Gram-positive bacterial infections is not statistically different, but linezolid maybe have advantage over vancomycin and teicoplanin in fever abating time, bacterial clearance rate and clinical efficiency.
Acetamides
;
adverse effects
;
therapeutic use
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Female
;
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
;
diagnosis
;
drug therapy
;
Humans
;
Linezolid
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Oxazolidinones
;
adverse effects
;
therapeutic use
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Teicoplanin
;
adverse effects
;
therapeutic use
;
Vancomycin
;
adverse effects
;
therapeutic use
4.Adverse Drug Reactions of Long-term Intravenous Antibiotics in Patients with Pyogenic Spondylitis.
Dong Hwan KIM ; Hwan Soo KIM ; Kyoung Hyup NAM ; Byung Kwan CHOI ; In Ho HAN
Korean Journal of Spine 2014;11(3):113-116
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence, cause, and influence of the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with long-term intravenous antibiotics in patients with pyogenic spondylitis (PS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 84 patients with PS who underwent intravenous antibiotic therapy in our hospital from January 2001 to December 2012. ADRs were categorized to drug eruption, acute renal failure (ARF), hematologic toxicity, toxic hepatitis, pseudomembranous colitis (PMC), drug fever, and neuronal toxicity. Incidence and onset time of each ADR after antibiotic therapy were analyzed with the incidence of ADRs according to types of antibiotics. RESULTS: ADRs occurred in 38 of the 84 patients (incidence: 45.2%). The use of antibiotics was longer in the patients with ADRs (62.7 days) than in the patients without ADRs (44.3 day). The incidence of drug eruption, ARF, hematologic toxicity, toxic hepatitis, PMC, drug fever, and neuronal toxicity were 22.6, 11.9, 11.9, 10.7, 7.1, 3.6%, and 1.2%, respectively. The duration of antibiotics administration was related to the occurrence of PMC (p=0.001). ADRs were more common in patients treated by glycopeptides including vacomycin and teicoplanin. CONCLUSION: The incidence of ADRs due to long-term intravenous antibiotics was as high as 45.2% in patients with PS. Therefore, we speculate that the possibility of delayed ADRs should be considered after long-term use of the antibiotics. Furthermore, close observation is mandatory to identify and treat ADRs promptly, even though PS revealed the improvement after antibiotic therapy.
Acute Kidney Injury
;
Anti-Bacterial Agents*
;
Drug Eruptions
;
Drug-Induced Liver Injury
;
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions*
;
Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous
;
Epidural Abscess
;
Fever
;
Glycopeptides
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Medical Records
;
Neurons
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Spondylitis*
;
Teicoplanin
5.Characteristics of Gram-positive cocci infection and the therapeutic effect after liver transplantation.
Xiaoxia WU ; Lingli WU ; Lin SHU ; Chenpeng XIE ; Qiquan WAN
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2023;48(5):707-715
OBJECTIVES:
Gram-positive cocci is the main pathogen responsible for early infection after liver transplantation (LT), posing a huge threat to the prognosis of liver transplant recipients. This study aims to analyze the distribution and drug resistance of Gram-positive cocci, the risk factors for infections and efficacy of antibiotics within 2 months after LT, and to guide the prevention and treatment of these infections.
METHODS:
In this study, data of pathogenic bacteria distribution, drug resistance and therapeutic efficacy were collected from 39 Gram-positive cocci infections among 256 patients who received liver transplantation from donation after citizens' death in the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2019 to July 2022, and risk factors for Gram-positive cocci infection were analyzed.
RESULTS:
Enterococcus faecium was the dominant pathogenic bacteria (33/51, 64.7%), followed by Enterococcus faecalis (11/51, 21.6%). The most common sites of infection were abdominal cavity/biliary tract (13/256, 5.1%) and urinary tract (10/256, 3.9%). Fifty (98%) of the 51 Gram-positive cocci infections occurred within 1 month after LT. The most sensitive drugs to Gram-positive cocci were teicoplanin, tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin. Vancomycin was not used in all patients, considering its nephrotoxicity. Vancomycin was not administered to all patients in view of its nephrotoxicity.There was no significant difference between the efficacy of daptomycin and teicoplanin in the prevention of cocci infection (P>0.05). Univariate analysis indicated that preoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score >25 (P=0.005), intraoperative red blood cell infusion ≥12 U (P=0.013) and exposure to more than 2 intravenous antibiotics post-LT (P=0.003) were related to Gram-positive cocci infections. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative MELD score >25 (OR=2.378, 95% CI 1.124 to 5.032, P=0.024) and intraoperative red blood cell transfusion ≥ 12 U (OR=2.757, 95% CI 1.227 to 6.195, P=0.014) were independent risk factors for Gram-positive cocci infections after LT. Postoperative Gram-positive cocci infections were reduced in LT recipients exposing to more than two intravenous antibiotics post-LT (OR=0.269, 95% CI 0.121 to 0.598, P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Gram-positive cocci infections occurring early after liver transplantation were dominated by Enterococcus faecalis infections at the abdominal/biliary tract and urinary tract. Teicoplanin, tigecycline and linezolid were anti-cocci sensitive drugs. Daptomycin and teicoplanin were equally effective in preventing cocci infections due to Gram-positive cocci. Patients with high preoperative MELD score and massive intraoperative red blood cell transfusion were more likely to suffer Gram-positive cocci infection after surgery. Postoperative Gram-positive cocci infections were reduced in recipients exposing to more than two intravenous antibiotics post-LT.
Humans
;
Daptomycin/therapeutic use*
;
Linezolid/therapeutic use*
;
Teicoplanin/therapeutic use*
;
Gram-Positive Cocci
;
Liver Transplantation/adverse effects*
;
Tigecycline/therapeutic use*
;
End Stage Liver Disease/drug therapy*
;
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology*
;
Severity of Illness Index
;
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology*
;
Vancomycin/therapeutic use*
;
Microbial Sensitivity Tests