In Japan, doctors inexperienced stent-graft new devices are required to secure agreement on criteria and choice of the device size in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) from experienced doctors. It was hoped that strict patient selection might reduce the learning curve for initial successes in given procedures. In a leading center in Japan, a number of cases which were scheduled for operation at other institutes were evaluated anatomically. We surveyed the initial success of Zenith AAA system implantation in the remaining cases by inexperienced doctors and evaluated the results. This study aimed to verify the validity of strict patient selection in improving the success rate of inexperienced doctors. We enrolled 112 consecutive patients from 19 institutes, who were scheduled for repair between January and October in 2007. All patients were evaluated on the basis of a less-than-3mm reconstructed CT image. Mean patient age was 76±5.7 years. All cases satisfied the Zenith's anatomic prerequisites. Fifteen cases were excluded for various reasons, the major reason being insufficiency of the proximal landing zone (LZ) length, angle and contour. The second reason was difficulty to approach via the iliac artery. Ninety seven cases were included, of which 17 cases were low-risk candidates for EVAR. Medium-risk seventy two cases requiring some advice to avoid problems with device size, technique of implantation and choice of main-body side. Eight cases were high-risk, requiring the presence of an experienced surgeon. Excluded cases had significantly shorter proximal LZ, larger aortic diameters 15mm below the renal artery and tortuous access routes on preliminary measurement by inexperienced doctor. Perioperative mortality was 0%, while the major complications were injury to the iliac artery in one high-risk case and thromboembolism of the superficial femoral artery in another. Perioperative proximal type I endoleak occurred in 5 cases. In 3 of these cases, the endoleak was eliminated by implantation of a Palmatz stent. In the other 2 cases, it disappeared within a month without additional procedures. These cases had a significantly greater angle between the proximal LZ and the suprarenal aorta and significant amount of mural thromboses in the proximal LZ. Perioperative type III endoleak occurred in 3 cases. In all cases the endoleak was eliminated by additional procedure. Perioperative type II endoleak occurred 8 cases. In 3 of these cases, the endoleak disappeared within a month. In the 5 other cases, the endoleak did not disappear. Mid-term results showed iliac leg thromboembolism in one case and new type II endoleaks in 3 cases. Type II endoleak occurred in cases which had significantly greater angles between the proximal LZ and the aneurysm. The results which were evaluated in our center had excellent perioperative and mid-term outcomes. We think this evaluation system is effective for risk assessment and reduces the learning curve in EVAR. In anatomically marginal cases, it is possible for proximal type I endoleak and injury of the iliac artery to occur. It is impossible to exclude these marginal cases if treatment need for EVAR is a priority. In these cases, lessexperienced operators should be trained in troubleshooting techniques in advance.

Here we report the results of a long-term analytical study on the utilization of antihypertensive and antibacterial agents, which was performed using the Integrated Medical Information System (IMIS) developed by Kochi Medical School. The results indicate clear (increasing or decreasing) patterns in the numbers of patients and the dosages. Specifically, the total amount of antibacterials recently prescribed is significantly lower than in the year analysis began (1983). This reduction provides evidence of a steady improvement in the quality of medication and is particularly important for macrocosmic evaluation of the primary focus of our study, which was the “proper use of drugs”. Furthermore, the results also showed medication prescribed by non-specialists to be less inventive than that prescribed by specialists. This study highlights the importance of reforming institutions providing medical treatment from the perspective of effectively utilizing medical resources (by employing specialist personnel) and the proper use of medications. Because non-specialists prescribe medication in numerous medical facilities throughout Japan, these issues must be seriously considered.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort imaging study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate lumbar sagittal alignment and range of motion (ROM) using radiographs in a large asymptomatic cohort and identify sex-based differences and age-related changes in the subjects. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Several researchers have tried to establish normal alignment and kinematic behavior of the lumbar spine, using plain radiographs. Few studies have employed a large and sex-and age-balanced cohort. METHODS: Total 627 healthy volunteers (at least 50 males and 50 females in each age decade, from the 3rd to the 8th decade) underwent whole spine radiography in the standing position; lumbar spine radiography was performed for all subjects in the recumbent position. Lumbar lordosis (LL, T12–S1) and ROM during flexion and extension were measured using a computer digitizer. RESULTS: The mean LL was 36.8°±13.2° in the recumbent position and 49.8°±11.2° in the standing position. The LL was greater in the standing position than in the recumbent position; further, LL was higher in females as compared to that in males. Local lordosis at each disk level increased incrementally with distal progression through the lumbar spine in both the positions. Local lordosis at L4–S1 was 29.8°±8.0° in the recumbent position and 34.2°±8.3° in the standing position and occupied 85.1% and 70.8% of the total LL, respectively. However, local lordosis in the standing position decreased with age at L2–3, L3–4, and L4–5 levels. Total lumbar ROM (T12–S1) decreased with age. The ROM in females was higher than that in males. CONCLUSIONS: We established the standard value and age-related changes in the lumbar alignment and ROM in each age decade in asymptomatic subjects. These data will be useful and provide the normal values for comparison in clinical practice to identify sex-based differences and age-related changes.
Animals ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Lordosis ; Male ; Posture ; Prospective Studies ; Radiography ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reference Values ; Spine

Background/Aims: To validate endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) used in conjunction with stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation (SOSE) as a preoperative diagnostic tool for resectable pancreatic cancer (R-PC) and borderline resectable PC (BR-PC). Methods: Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent EUS-TA for suspected R-PC or BR-PC were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the sensitivity of EUS-TA together with SOSE based on the stereomicroscopically visible white core (SVWC) cutoff value. One or two sites were punctured by using a 22-gauge biopsy needle for EUS-TA, based on the SOSE findings. Results: We collected 99 specimens from 56 and 22 patients with R-PC and BR-PC, respectively. Based on the SOSE results, we performed 57 procedures with one puncture. The SVWC cutoff values were met in 73.7% and 73.1% of all specimens and in those obtained during the first puncture, respectively. The final diagnoses were malignant and benign tumors in 76 and two patients, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-TA for the 78 lesions were 90.8%, 100%, and 91.0%, respectively. The sensitivity for malignant diagnosis based on the SVWC cutoff value were 89.5% and 90.4% for the first puncture and all specimens, respectively. Conclusions The sensitivity of EUS-TA in conjunction with SOSE for malignancy diagnosis in patients with suspected R-PC or BR-PC was 90.4%.

Background/Aims: To validate endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) used in conjunction with stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation (SOSE) as a preoperative diagnostic tool for resectable pancreatic cancer (R-PC) and borderline resectable PC (BR-PC). Methods: Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent EUS-TA for suspected R-PC or BR-PC were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the sensitivity of EUS-TA together with SOSE based on the stereomicroscopically visible white core (SVWC) cutoff value. One or two sites were punctured by using a 22-gauge biopsy needle for EUS-TA, based on the SOSE findings. Results: We collected 99 specimens from 56 and 22 patients with R-PC and BR-PC, respectively. Based on the SOSE results, we performed 57 procedures with one puncture. The SVWC cutoff values were met in 73.7% and 73.1% of all specimens and in those obtained during the first puncture, respectively. The final diagnoses were malignant and benign tumors in 76 and two patients, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-TA for the 78 lesions were 90.8%, 100%, and 91.0%, respectively. The sensitivity for malignant diagnosis based on the SVWC cutoff value were 89.5% and 90.4% for the first puncture and all specimens, respectively. Conclusions The sensitivity of EUS-TA in conjunction with SOSE for malignancy diagnosis in patients with suspected R-PC or BR-PC was 90.4%.

Background/Aims: To validate endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) used in conjunction with stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation (SOSE) as a preoperative diagnostic tool for resectable pancreatic cancer (R-PC) and borderline resectable PC (BR-PC). Methods: Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent EUS-TA for suspected R-PC or BR-PC were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the sensitivity of EUS-TA together with SOSE based on the stereomicroscopically visible white core (SVWC) cutoff value. One or two sites were punctured by using a 22-gauge biopsy needle for EUS-TA, based on the SOSE findings. Results: We collected 99 specimens from 56 and 22 patients with R-PC and BR-PC, respectively. Based on the SOSE results, we performed 57 procedures with one puncture. The SVWC cutoff values were met in 73.7% and 73.1% of all specimens and in those obtained during the first puncture, respectively. The final diagnoses were malignant and benign tumors in 76 and two patients, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-TA for the 78 lesions were 90.8%, 100%, and 91.0%, respectively. The sensitivity for malignant diagnosis based on the SVWC cutoff value were 89.5% and 90.4% for the first puncture and all specimens, respectively. Conclusions The sensitivity of EUS-TA in conjunction with SOSE for malignancy diagnosis in patients with suspected R-PC or BR-PC was 90.4%.