1.The metal tantalum in orthopedic applications.
Journal of Biomedical Engineering 2011;28(2):419-422
This paper describes the biological characteristics of the metal tantalum (Ts) and the application status of tantalum in artificial joints, bone necrosis, spine, defects of bone and other aspects of bone. The early clinical application results of tantalum in bone diseases were satisfactory, but it is necessary to do further study of tantalum in a deep going way, and further detailed comparison between the tantalum with other metals as orthopedics implants. The advantage of tantalum materials as orthopedic implants still needs to be verified by a great deal of clinical cases for a long period of time.
Biocompatible Materials
;
therapeutic use
;
Bone Diseases
;
surgery
;
Humans
;
Orthopedic Fixation Devices
;
Orthopedic Procedures
;
instrumentation
;
Prostheses and Implants
;
Tantalum
;
therapeutic use
2.Treatment of Steroid-induced Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head by Porous Tantalum Rod and Gugutou Huaisiyu Capsule.
Xu-yi TAN ; Fei-fei GAO ; Shu-tu GAO ; You-wen LIU ; Xian-tao CHEN ; Li-yun LIU
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine 2016;36(1):40-43
OBJECTIVETo observe the curative effect of porous tantalum rod and Gugutou Huaisiyu Capsule (GHC) for steroid-induced osteonecrosis of femoral head (SONFH).
METHODSA total 60 hips of 50 SONFH patients were randomly assigned to the treatment group and the control group according to grouping time, 25 in each group (30 hips). Patients in the control group were implanted with porous tantalum rod, while those in the treatment group additionally took GHC (5 pills each time, three time per day for 2 successive months; and then twice per day for 4 successive months). Then all patients were followed-up to observe Harris hip score. The curative effect and the femoral head survival time were assessed.
RESULTSA total of 49 patients (59 hips) were followed-up. The Harris hip score of the two groups at the final follow-up was significantly improved after treatment, with statistical difference when compared with before treatment (P < 0.01). Besides, it was higher in the treatment group than in the control group. The curative effect and the survival time were superior in the treatment group, with statistical difference when compared with the control group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONSPorous tantalum rod combined GHC got better effect in treating SONFH. It could significantly improve the function of affected hips and prolong the survival time of femoral head.
Capsules ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Femur Head Necrosis ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Prostheses and Implants ; Steroids ; adverse effects ; Tantalum
3.Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty after Core Decompression with Tantalum Rod for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.
Gun Woo LEE ; Kyung Soon PARK ; Do Youn KIM ; Young Min LEE ; Kamolhuja Eshnazarovich ESHNAZAROV ; Taek Rim YOON
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2016;8(1):38-44
BACKGROUND: Early stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) has many treatment options including core decompression with implantation of a tantalum rod. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes and potential complications during conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) in such patients. METHODS: Six male patients (8 hips) underwent THA subsequent to removing a tantalum rod (group I) from April 2010 to November 2011. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of these patients. We enrolled 12 age- and sex-matched patients (16 hips) during the same period, who had undergone primary THA without a previous operation as the control group (group II). All patients were followed for at least 3 years. We checked the Harris hip score (HHS), operative time, and volume of blood loss. Radiological results, including inclination, anteversion of the acetabular cup, presence of periprosthetic osteolysis, and subsidence of femoral stem were checked at the last follow-up. RESULTS: The mean preoperative HHS values were 56.5 (range, 50 to 62) and 59.1 (range, 42 to 70) in groups I and II, respectively. The HHS improved to 96.0 (range, 93 to 100) and 97.6 (range, 93 to 100), respectively, at the 3-year follow-up (p = 0.172). Mean operation time was 98.8 minutes (range, 70 to 120 minutes) in group I and 77.5 minutes (range, 60 to 115 minutes) in group II (p = 0.006). Total blood loss volumes were 1,193.8 mL (range, 960 to 1,360 mL) and 944.1 mL (range, 640 to 1,280 mL) in groups I and II, respectively (p = 0.004). No significant differences in inclination or anteversion of acetabular cup and no evidence of osteolysis or subsidence of the femoral stem were reported in either group in radiological follow-up results. However, one case of squeaking occurred in group I during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The two groups showed no clinical or radiological differences except extended operative time and increased blood loss. However, the incidence of squeaking (1 of 8 hips) was higher, as compared to the control group or previously reported values.
Adult
;
*Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects/methods/statistics & numerical data
;
Case-Control Studies
;
*Decompression, Surgical/adverse effects/methods/statistics & numerical data
;
Femur Head/diagnostic imaging/surgery
;
Femur Head Necrosis/diagnostic imaging/*surgery
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Reoperation
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Tantalum/*therapeutic use
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
;
Treatment Outcome