1.PAIN MANAGEMENT AT THE END OF LIFE
The Singapore Family Physician 2016;42(3):31-41
Pain is a common symptom among populations with
life-limiting illnesses. Like all clinicians, family
physicians involved in the care of these patients should
acquire the skills and knowledge required to provide
good pain control in order for the patients and their
caregivers to achieve optimal quality of life. This paper
is a review and presentation of the definition,
classification, assessment and management of pain at
the end of life based on available guidelines and
evidence.
2.Improvements in end-of-life care with a protocol-based pathway for cancer patients dying in a Singapore hospital.
Patricia S H NEO ; Mai Chan POON ; Tan Ying PEH ; Simon Y K ONG ; Wen Hsin KOO ; Ulina SANTOSO ; Cynthia R GOH ; Alethea C P YEE
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2012;41(11):483-493
INTRODUCTIONMore than half of all deaths in Singapore occur in hospitals. Little is known about the quality of care received by dying patients in hospitals. The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) provides a framework of providing good end-of-life care for dying patients and has been used with success in the United Kingdom (UK). In this study, we investigate whether adoption of a modified LCP in a Singapore hospital translated to better end-of-life care for cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODSThe LCP was adapted and implemented as a pilot project on an oncology ward in Singapore General Hospital. A baseline review of 30 consecutive death records was performed, followed by a 4-month pilot and post-implementation audit of 30 consecutive patients on the adapted LCP.
RESULTSFive types of end-of-life symptoms were analysed. There was only 1 uncontrolled symptom at death in the post-implementation group compared to 24 uncontrolled symptoms in the retrospective audit group. The prescription of breakthrough medications for symptom control increased from 21% in the retrospective audit group to 79% in the post-implementation group. Inappropriate monitoring was discontinued in 25 patients in the post-implementation group compared to none in the retrospective audit group. The documentation of resuscitation status and religion of the patient was improved, achieving full documentation in the post-implementation group.
CONCLUSIONThis study shows promising results for improving end-of-life care in cancer patients with a protocol-based pathway in a Singapore hospital. Extension of this care pathway to other settings should be explored to maximise its benefits to patients dying from all causes in hospital.
Critical Pathways ; standards ; Diffusion of Innovation ; Female ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitals, Public ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Audit ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms ; Quality Improvement ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; Terminal Care ; standards ; Tertiary Care Centers ; United Kingdom