OBJECTIVE: To observe the efficacy and safety of Guihuang Formula (GHF) in treating patients with type III prostatitis and Chinese medicine syndrome of dampness-heat and blood stasis. METHODS: Sixty-six patients diagnosed with type III prostatitis with dampness-heat and blood stasis syndrome were randomly divided into the treatment group (GHF) and the control group (tamsulosin) using a random number table, with 33 cases each group. The treatment group received GHF twice a day, and the control group received tamsulosin 0.2 mg once daily before bedtime. Patients in both groups received treatment for 6 weeks and was followed up for 2 weeks. The outcomes included the National Institute of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) score, Chinese Medicine Symptoms Score (CMSS), expressed prostatic secretions (EPS) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: After treatment, the NIH-CPSI total score and domain scores of pain discomfort, urination and quality of life decreased significantly from the baseline in both groups (P<0.05). The CMSS score decreased in both groups (P<0.05). The WBC count decreased and lecithin body count increased in both groups (P<0.05). GHF showed a more obvious advantage in reducing the pain discomfort and quality of life domain scores of NIH-CPSI, reducing the CMSS score, increasing the improvement rate of the WBC and lecithin body counts, compared with the control group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in decreasing urination domain score of NIH-CPSI between two groups (P>0.05). In addition, no serious AEs were observed. CONCLUSION GHF is effective in treating type III prostatitis patients with dampness-heat and blood stasis syndrome without serious AEs. (Registration No. ChiCTR1900026966).
Chronic Disease ; Hot Temperature ; Humans ; Lecithins ; Male ; Pain ; Prostatitis/drug therapy* ; Quality of Life ; Tamsulosin

ObjectiveTo investigate the therapeutic effects of commonly used selective α-adrenergic receptor antagonists (α-ARA) on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODSPubMed, Embase and CNKI databases were searched for the literature about selective α-ARAs for the treatment of BPH and the information was extracted on the common adverse reactions in the course of treatment. Multivariate meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the therapeutic effects of different α-ARAs.

RESULTSThe total rates of adverse effects of silodosin and tamsulosin were the highest, 51.9% and 34.0% respectively, with the highest incidences of headache (38.3%), weakness (23.6%) and dizziness (17.5%). Besides, tamsulosin ranked the first in inducing sexual dysfunction of the male patients with BPH (70.4%).

CONCLUSIONSDoxazosin is preferable as the first-choice treatment of BPH for its therapeutic effect and improvement of the patient's quality of life. Silodosin and tamsulosin, however, can be selectively used according to the patient's specific tolerance to different adverse effects.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Doxazosin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Indoles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; drug therapy ; Quality of Life ; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological ; chemically induced ; Tamsulosin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

Objective: To study the safety and efficacy of Bushen Daozhuo Granules (BDG) in the treatment of type Ⅲ prostatitis. METHODS: This multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial included 478 patients with type Ⅲ prostatitis, 290 in the trial group and 188 as controls, the former treated with BDG at 200 ml bid and the latter with tamsulosin hydrochloride sustainedrelease capsules at 0.2 mg qd, both for 4 weeks. Before treatment, after 4 weeks of medication, and at 4 weeks after drug withdrawal, we obtained the NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIHCPSI) scores and compared the safety and effectiveness rate between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: Compared with the baseline, the NIHCPSI score was markedly decreased in the control group after 4 weeks of medication (21.42 ± 4.02 vs 15.67 ± 3.65, P < 0.05) but showed no statistically significant difference from that at 4 weeks after drug withdrawal (19.03 ± 3.86) (P>0.05), while the NIHCPSI score in the trial group was remarkably lower than the baseline both after 4 weeks of medication and at 4 weeks after drug withdrawal (10.92 ± 2.06 and 12.91 ± 2.64 vs 21.58 ± 3.67, P < 0.05). The trial group exhibited both a higher rate of total effectiveness and safety than the control (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS BDG is safe and effective for the treatment of type Ⅲ prostatitis.
Capsules ; Chronic Disease ; Delayed-Action Preparations ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Prostatitis ; drug therapy ; pathology ; Sulfonamides ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Tamsulosin ; Treatment Outcome ; Urological Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

Objective: To study the therapeutic effect of Lamiophlomis Rotata Capsule (LRC) in the treatment of type ⅢB prostatitis. METHODS: We randomly divided 225 patients with type ⅢB prostatitis into an experimental group (n =125) and a control group (n =120), the former treated orally with LRC at 3 capsules tid while the latter with tamsulosin hydrochloride sustained-release capsules at 0.2 mg qd, both for 4 weeks. We compared the therapeutic effects between the two groups of patients based on the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) obtained before, immediately after and at 4 weeks after medication. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients completed the treatment in the experimental group, which showed remarkable decreases as compared with the baseline in the pain score (5.30 ± 1.23 vs 14.68 ± 1.51, P<0.05), quality of life (QoL) score (6.46 ± 0.93 vs 8.52 ± 1.05, P<0.05) and total NIH-CPSI score (17.50 ± 2.77 vs 27.99 ± 2.98, P<0.05) after 4 weeks of treatment, but no significant change in the urination symptoms score (7.41 ± 1.16 vs 7.16 ± 1.04, P>0.05). The experimental group achieved even markedly lower scores than the controls in the pain symptom (5.30 ± 1.23 vs 13.67 ± 1.49, P<0.05), QoL (6.46 ± 0.93 vs 7.47 ± 0.88, P<0.05) and total NIH-CPSI (17.50 ± 2.77 vs 25.77 ± 2.01, P<0.05) but a higher urination symptoms score than the latter after medication (7.16 ± 1.04 vs 5.68 ± 1.34, P<0.05). At 4 weeks after drug withdrawal, the experimental group also showed significantly lower scores of the pain symptom (7.23 ± 1.03), QoL (6.58 ± 0.87) and total NIH-CPSI (22.18 ± 2.03) than the baseline (all P<0.05) and those in the control group (14.14 ± 0.98, 8.12 ± 0.72 and 26.89 ± 1.67) (all P<0.05). Apart from dizziness in 2 of the patients, who gave up medication halfway, no other obvious adverse reactions were observed during the experiment. CONCLUSIONS Lamiophlomis Rotata Capsule deserves to be recommended for the treatment of type ⅢB prostatitis for its safety and effectiveness in reducing the pain and improving the life quality of the patients.
Capsules ; Chronic Disease ; Delayed-Action Preparations ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Pain Management ; Prostatitis ; drug therapy ; pathology ; Quality of Life ; Tamsulosin ; therapeutic use ; Urination ; Urological Agents ; therapeutic use