1.Is repeated high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) therapy permissible for patients with early stage endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia who desire preserving fertility?.
Wataru YAMAGAMI ; Nobuyuki SUSUMU ; Takeshi MAKABE ; Kensuke SAKAI ; Hiroyuki NOMURA ; Fumio KATAOKA ; Akira HIRASAWA ; Kouji BANNO ; Daisuke AOKI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2018;29(2):e21-
OBJECTIVE: Reports on the repeated administration of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) for intrauterine recurrence after fertility-preserving therapy for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early grade 1 endometrioid carcinoma (G1) are lacking. We aimed to clarify the outcomes of repeated MPA therapy in cases of intrauterine recurrence after fertility-preserving therapy with MPA against AEH/early G1. METHODS: Patients with AEH or stage IA well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma without myometrial invasion who underwent first-line MPA therapy for primary lesions or intrauterine recurrence were divided into initial treatment and repeated treatment groups (162 and 82 patients, respectively). Oral MPA administration (400−600 mg/day) was continued until pathological tumor disappearance. Data regarding clinicopathological factors, adverse events, and outcomes following the initial and repeated hormonal treatments were extracted from medical records and analyzed. RESULTS: Complete response rates in the initial and repeated treatment groups were 98.5% and 96.4%, respectively, among patients with AEH, and were 90.7% and 98.1%, respectively, among patients with G1. In the initial treatment group, 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 53.7% and 33.2% among patients with AEH and G1, respectively. In the repeated treatment group, RFS rates were 14.0% and 11.2% among patients with AEH and G1, respectively. Among patients with AEH, the pregnancy rate tended to be lower in the repeated treatment group than in the initial treatment group (11.1% vs. 29.2%; p=0.107), while no significant group difference was observed among patients with G1 (20.8% vs. 22.7%). CONCLUSION: Repeated treatment is sufficiently effective for intrauterine recurrence after hormonal therapy for AEH/early G1.
Carcinoma, Endometrioid
;
Endometrial Hyperplasia*
;
Endometrial Neoplasms*
;
Female
;
Fertility Preservation
;
Fertility*
;
Hormone Replacement Therapy
;
Humans
;
Medical Records
;
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate*
;
Medroxyprogesterone*
;
Pregnancy Rate
;
Recurrence
2.Phase 2 single-arm study on the efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated, homologous recombination-deficient ovarian cancer
Aikou OKAMOTO ; Eiji KONDO ; Toshiaki NAKAMURA ; Satoshi YANAGIDA ; Junzo HAMANISHI ; Kenichi HARANO ; Kosei HASEGAWA ; Takeshi HIRASAWA ; Kensuke HORI ; Shinichi KOMIYAMA ; Motoki MATSUURA ; Hidekatsu NAKAI ; Hiroko NAKAMURA ; Jun SAKATA ; Tsutomu TABATA ; Kazuhiro TAKEHARA ; Munetaka TAKEKUMA ; Yoshihito YOKOYAMA ; Yoichi KASE ; Shuuji SUMINO ; Junpei SOEDA ; Ajit SURI ; Daisuke AOKI ; Toru SUGIYAMA
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2021;32(2):e16-
Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer.
Methods:
This Phase 2 open-label, single-arm study enrolled Japanese women with homologous recombination deficiency-positive relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had completed 3–4 lines of therapy. The starting dose of niraparib was 300 mg administered once daily in continuous 28-day cycles until objective progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal or discontinuation. The primary endpoint, objective response rate (ORR), was assessed by the investigator using RECIST version 1.1. Safety evaluations included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including serious TEAEs.
Results:
Twenty women were enrolled and the confirmed ORR in the full analysis set (FAS) was 35.0% (7/20), consisting of 1 complete response and 6 partial responses. Disease control rate in the FAS was 90.0%. The most frequently reported TEAEs (>50%) were anemia, nausea, and platelet count decreased. One patient (5.0%) had TEAEs leading to discontinuation of niraparib whereas reductions or interruptions were reported in 14 (70.0%) and 15 (75.0%) patients, respectively. The median dose intensity (202.9 mg daily) corresponded to a relative dose intensity of 67.6%.
Conclusion
Efficacy and safety of niraparib in heavily pretreated Japanese women was comparable to that seen in an equivalent population of non-Japanese women. No new safety signals were identified.