Objective: Nitroglycerin is a first-line treatment for hypertensive acute heart failure syndrome (AHFS). However, nicardipine is frequently used to treat hypertensive emergencies, including AHFS. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of nicardipine and nitroglycerin in patients with hypertensive AHFS.Patients and Methods: This single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted at the intensive care unit of a Japanese hospital. Patients diagnosed with AHFS and systolic blood pressure 140 mmHg on arrival between April 2013 and March 2021 were included. The outcomes were the time to optimal blood pressure control, duration of continuous infusion of antihypertensive agents, duration of positive pressure ventilation, need for additional antihypertensive agents, length of hospital stay, and body weight changes. Outcomes were compared between the nicardipine and nitroglycerin groups. We also compared these outcomes between the groups after excluding patients who received renal replacement therapy.Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled (26 and 32 patients were treated with nitroglycerin and nicardipine, respectively). The nicardipine group had a shorter time to optimal blood pressure control (2.0 [interquartile range, 2.0–8.5] h vs. 1.0 [0.5–2.0] h), shorter duration of continuous anti-hypertensive agent infusion (3.0 [2.0–5.0] days vs. 2.0 [1.0–2.0] days), less frequent need for additional anti-hypertensive agents (1 patients [3.1%] vs. 11 patients [42.3%]), and shorter length of hospital stay (17.5 [10.0–33.0] days vs. 9.0 [5.0–15.0] days) than the nitroglycerin group. The duration of positive pressure ventilation and body weight changes were similar between the groups. The outcomes were similar after excluding patients who received renal replacement therapy.Conclusion: Nicardipine may be more effective than nitroglycerin for treating hypertensive AHFS.