Although several cases of a dumbbell tumor of thoracic nerve roots have been reported, reports on the surgical procedures for a dumbbell tumor of the first thoracic (T1) nerve root are rare. Surgeons should be cautious, especially when performing a surgical procedure for a dumbbell tumor of the T1 nerve root because the tumor is anatomically located adjacent to important organs and because the T1 nerve root composes the lower trunk of the brachial plexus with the eighth cervical nerve root. We present cases with dumbbell tumors of the T1 nerve root that were treated with combined surgical treatment to remove the tumor. We first performed video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) to release the organs anteriorly and then performed posterior spinal surgery in the prone position. The combined VATS and posterior spinal surgery may become a standard surgical procedure for the treatment of dumbbell tumors of the T1 nerve root.
Brachial Plexus ; Prone Position ; Spinal Cord Neoplasms ; Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive ; Thoracic Nerves* ; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is no consensus for using endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) in patients without dilatation of the lower part of the bile duct (DLBD). We evaluated the feasibility and safety of EPLBD for the removal of difficult bile duct stones (diameter ≥10 mm) in patients without DLBD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 209 patients who underwent EPLBD for the removal of bile duct stones from October 2009 to July 2014. Primary outcomes were the clearance rate and additional mechanical lithotripsy. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of complications and recurrence rate. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients had DLBD (27.3%), and 152 did not have DLBD (72.7%). There were no significant differences in the overall success rate or the use of mechanical lithotripsy. Success rate during the first session and procedure time were better in the DLBD than the without-DLBD group (75.7% vs 66.7%, 48.1±23.0 minutes vs 58.4±31.7 minutes, respectively). As for complications, there were no significant differences in the incidence of pancreatitis, perforation or bleeding after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The recurrence rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: EPLBD is a useful and safe method for common bile duct stone removal in patients without DLBD.
Bile Ducts* ; Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic* ; Bile* ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Common Bile Duct ; Consensus ; Dilatation* ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Incidence ; Lithotripsy ; Methods ; Pancreatitis ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies

An 81-year-old woman sustained a fracture of the vertebra, resulting in grace deformation. After surgery for the spinal fixation, she suffered from left femoral neuropathic pain and motor weakness of both lower extremities. Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the lower extremity area in the right motor cortex was applied using a figure-8 coil connected to a magnetic stimulator (MagPro R30；Nagventure)．One thousand pulses per session were delivered (10 trains of 10Hz for 10 seconds with 25-seconds intertrain interval) in one day, and this treatment continued for 2 weeks except Sunday. The intensity of rTMS was set at the resting motor threshold for that day. rTMS together with physical therapy resulted in a remarkable amelioration of the femoral pain and motor weakness of both lower extremities. Pain on a Visual Analogue Scale dropped from 70％ to 22％, and walking speed and walking rate increased. Functional Independence Measure score increased from 58 to 79, and Euro QOL 5 score increased from 0.419 to 0.768. As previously reported in cases of post-stroke pain and motor weakness, rTMS together with physical therapy exerted measurable beneficial effects on intractable pain and motor weakness caused by spinal orthodontic fixation.