1.Follow-up Study on Electroconvulsive Therapy in Treatment-resistant Depressed Patients after Remission: A Chart Review.
Yuki TOKUTSU ; Wakako UMENE-NAKANO ; Takahiro SHINKAI ; Reiji YOSHIMURA ; Tatsuya OKAMOTO ; Asuka KATSUKI ; Hikaru HORI ; Atsuko IKENOUCHI-SUGITA ; Kenji HAYASHI ; Kiyokazu ATAKE ; Jun NAKAMURA
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2013;11(1):34-38
OBJECTIVE: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has proven to be effective in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). In recent reports, 70% to 90% of patients with TRD responded to ECT. However, post-ECT relapse is a significant problem. There are no studies investigating risk factors associated with reintroducing ECT in depressive patients after remission previously achieved with former ECT. The aim of the present study is to examine such risk factors using a sample of TRD patients. METHODS: We conducted a chart review to examine patient outcomes and adverse events over short- and long-term periods. Forty-two patients met the criteria for major depressive disorder. RESULTS: The response rate was 85.7% (36/42). There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of patients exhibiting remission, response or non-response. The rate of adverse events was 21.4% (9/42). Among 34 patients who were available for follow-up, 18 patients relapsed (relapse rate, 52.9%), and 6 patients were reintroduced to ECT. The patients' age and age of onset were significantly higher in the re-ECT group than non re-ECT group. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that older age and older age of onset might be considered for requirement of re-ECT after remission previously achieved with former ECT.
Age of Onset
;
Aging
;
Depression
;
Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
;
Electroconvulsive Therapy
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Recurrence
;
Risk Factors
2.Optimal First-Line Antibiotic Treatment for Pediatric Complicated Appendicitis Based on Peritoneal Fluid Culture
Tsubasa AIYOSHI ; Kouji MASUMOTO ; Nao TANAKA ; Takato SASAKI ; Fumiko CHIBA ; Kentaro ONO ; Takahiro JIMBO ; Yasuhisa URITA ; Toko SHINKAI ; Hajime TAKAYASU ; Shigemi HITOMI
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition 2021;24(6):510-517
Purpose:
Consensus is lacking regarding the optimal antibiotic treatment for pediatric complicated appendicitis. This study determined the optimal first-line antibiotic treatment for pediatric patients with complicated appendicitis based on peritoneal fluid cultures.
Methods:
This retrospective study examined the cases of pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis at our institution between 2013 and 2019. Peritoneal fluid specimens obtained during appendectomy were cultured for the presence of bacteria.
Results:
Eighty-six pediatric patients were diagnosed with complicated appendicitis.Of them, bacteria were identified in 54 peritoneal fluid samples. The major identified bacteria were Escherichia coli (n=36 [66.7%]), Bacteroides fragilis (n=28 [51.9%]), α-Streptococcus (n=25 [46.3%]), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=10 [18.5%]), Enterococcus avium (n=9 [16.7%]), γ-Streptococcus (n=9 [16.7%]), and Klebsiella oxytoca (n=6 [11.1%]). An antibiotic susceptibility analysis showed E. coli was inhibited by sulbactam/ampicillin in 43.8% of cases versus cefmetazole in 100% of cases. Tazobactam/piperacillin and meropenem inhibited the growth of 96.9-100% of the major identified bacteria. E. coli (100% vs. 84.6%) and P. aeruginosa (100% vs. 80.0%) were more susceptible to amikacin than gentamicin.
Conclusion
Tazobactam/piperacillin or meropenem is a reasonable first-line antibiotic treatment for pediatric complicated appendicitis. In the case of aminoglycoside use, amikacin is recommended.