Purpose: Medial soft tissue release in knee varus deformities during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is necessary for adequate gap balancing.This study compared the clinical outcomes and complications of subperiosteal elevation (SE) and multiple needle puncturing (MNP) for superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) release and evaluated the effectiveness and safety of MNP. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 152 patients who underwent both TKA and sMCL release for degenerative osteoarthritis with varus alignment; one knee from each patient underwent SE and the other underwent MNP between April 2018 and April 2020. In SE, subperiosteal release was performed on the proximal tibia of the anterior portion of the sMCL using a curved osteotome. For MNP, an 18-gauge needle was used to puncture the sMCL. The clinical outcomes, including knee further flexion (FF), flexion contracture (FC), range of motion (ROM) and Knee Society (KS) scores, were compared. Surgical complications, including sMCL overrelease, were also evaluated. Results: For the SE and MNP groups, the preoperative KS scores (31.05 vs. 31.78), knee alignment (varus angle, 4.22° vs. 3.76°), FF (125.86° vs. 126.48°), FC (6.09° vs. 5.69°) and ROM (119.77° vs. 120.79°) did not differ preoperatively. At one-year follow-up, postoperative KS scores, FF, FC and ROM were similar in the two groups (93.01 vs. 92.64 points; 134.24° vs. 134.64°; 0.36° vs. 0.49°; 133.88° vs. 134.14°;p=0.662, 0.749, 0.493 and 0.835 respectively), and no statistically significant differences in terms of postoperative pain and KS pain score were observed between the two groups (66 vs. 58 patients and 43.31 vs. 43.04 points; p=0.473 and 0.745, respectively). In the SE group, five cases showed intraoperative over-release of the sMCL and a significant difference from the MNP group (p=0.024) but showed no medial instability at the final follow-up. Conclusion Compared with the SE technique, MNP showed no significant difference in the clinical outcomes and fewer complications, such as over-release of the sMCL, and could be a safer alternative to achieve a balanced TKA.

Purpose: Medial soft tissue release in knee varus deformities during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is necessary for adequate gap balancing.This study compared the clinical outcomes and complications of subperiosteal elevation (SE) and multiple needle puncturing (MNP) for superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) release and evaluated the effectiveness and safety of MNP. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 152 patients who underwent both TKA and sMCL release for degenerative osteoarthritis with varus alignment; one knee from each patient underwent SE and the other underwent MNP between April 2018 and April 2020. In SE, subperiosteal release was performed on the proximal tibia of the anterior portion of the sMCL using a curved osteotome. For MNP, an 18-gauge needle was used to puncture the sMCL. The clinical outcomes, including knee further flexion (FF), flexion contracture (FC), range of motion (ROM) and Knee Society (KS) scores, were compared. Surgical complications, including sMCL overrelease, were also evaluated. Results: For the SE and MNP groups, the preoperative KS scores (31.05 vs. 31.78), knee alignment (varus angle, 4.22° vs. 3.76°), FF (125.86° vs. 126.48°), FC (6.09° vs. 5.69°) and ROM (119.77° vs. 120.79°) did not differ preoperatively. At one-year follow-up, postoperative KS scores, FF, FC and ROM were similar in the two groups (93.01 vs. 92.64 points; 134.24° vs. 134.64°; 0.36° vs. 0.49°; 133.88° vs. 134.14°;p=0.662, 0.749, 0.493 and 0.835 respectively), and no statistically significant differences in terms of postoperative pain and KS pain score were observed between the two groups (66 vs. 58 patients and 43.31 vs. 43.04 points; p=0.473 and 0.745, respectively). In the SE group, five cases showed intraoperative over-release of the sMCL and a significant difference from the MNP group (p=0.024) but showed no medial instability at the final follow-up. Conclusion Compared with the SE technique, MNP showed no significant difference in the clinical outcomes and fewer complications, such as over-release of the sMCL, and could be a safer alternative to achieve a balanced TKA.

Purpose: Medial soft tissue release in knee varus deformities during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is necessary for adequate gap balancing.This study compared the clinical outcomes and complications of subperiosteal elevation (SE) and multiple needle puncturing (MNP) for superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) release and evaluated the effectiveness and safety of MNP. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 152 patients who underwent both TKA and sMCL release for degenerative osteoarthritis with varus alignment; one knee from each patient underwent SE and the other underwent MNP between April 2018 and April 2020. In SE, subperiosteal release was performed on the proximal tibia of the anterior portion of the sMCL using a curved osteotome. For MNP, an 18-gauge needle was used to puncture the sMCL. The clinical outcomes, including knee further flexion (FF), flexion contracture (FC), range of motion (ROM) and Knee Society (KS) scores, were compared. Surgical complications, including sMCL overrelease, were also evaluated. Results: For the SE and MNP groups, the preoperative KS scores (31.05 vs. 31.78), knee alignment (varus angle, 4.22° vs. 3.76°), FF (125.86° vs. 126.48°), FC (6.09° vs. 5.69°) and ROM (119.77° vs. 120.79°) did not differ preoperatively. At one-year follow-up, postoperative KS scores, FF, FC and ROM were similar in the two groups (93.01 vs. 92.64 points; 134.24° vs. 134.64°; 0.36° vs. 0.49°; 133.88° vs. 134.14°;p=0.662, 0.749, 0.493 and 0.835 respectively), and no statistically significant differences in terms of postoperative pain and KS pain score were observed between the two groups (66 vs. 58 patients and 43.31 vs. 43.04 points; p=0.473 and 0.745, respectively). In the SE group, five cases showed intraoperative over-release of the sMCL and a significant difference from the MNP group (p=0.024) but showed no medial instability at the final follow-up. Conclusion Compared with the SE technique, MNP showed no significant difference in the clinical outcomes and fewer complications, such as over-release of the sMCL, and could be a safer alternative to achieve a balanced TKA.

This study offers a comprehensive overview of brain organoids for researchers. It combines expert opinions with technical summaries on organoid definitions, characteristics, culture methods, and quality control. This approach aims to enhance the utilization of brain organoids in research. Brain organoids, as three-dimensional human cell models mimicking the nervous system, hold immense promise for studying the human brain. They offer advantages over traditional methods, replicating anatomical structures, physiological features, and complex neuronal networks. Additionally, brain organoids can model nervous system development and interactions between cell types and the microenvironment. By providing a foundation for utilizing the most human-relevant tissue models, this work empowers researchers to overcome limitations of two-dimensional cultures and conduct advanced disease modeling research.