1.Impact of the Pattern of Acute Rejection Episodes on Graft Survival.
Jung Taeck OH ; Kyung Keun LEE ; Kwon Mook CHAE ; Byung Jun SO
The Journal of the Korean Society for Transplantation 1998;12(2):221-228
The major reason for the chronic graft loss is chronic rejection. The only predictive factor for chronic rejection is a prior acute rejection episode resulting in a poorer long-term outcome. Also the number of acute rejection episodes is a strong predictor of long-term allograft failure. This study evaluated the impact of a first acute rejection episode and the severity of the rejection and the number of acute rejection episodes on allograft survival. Total of 136 renal transplant were performed between August 1987 to January 1996 at Wonkwang university hospital, and we studied 108 renal transplants that were followed for a minimum of 1.5 years. Acute allograft rejection was mainly diagnosed by clinical evaluation and laboratory data. Transplant patients were divided into three groups according to the time to the first acute rejection; no rejection (group I, n=44); acute rejection during the first 6 months (group II, n=42), acute rejection after 6 months (group III, n=22) and divided into four groups according to the number of acute rejection episodes; no rejection (Group A, n=44), one time (Group B, n=24), two times (Group C, n=23), and more than three times (Group D, n=17). Five-year allograft survival rate for group I-III was 96.4%, 82.7%, 58.5%, respectively (p<0.05 for each comparison to group I). Later acute rejection episodes were associated with worse response to rejection therapy and Group III had higher serum creatinine concentration after rejection therapy than Group II (2.46 1.13 mg/dl vs 1.19 0.7 mg/dl, p<0.05). Five-year allograft survival rate for group A-D was 93.4%, 73.2%, 57.4%, 74.5%, respectively, Group A shows higher graft survival rate, but there was not significant difference in long-term allograft survival among Group B-D. We conclude that late occurrence of a first acute rejection portends a worse prognosis for long-term allograft survival and decreases response to rejection therapy and results in poor graft function. Prevention of later rejection may require a broader focus, with additional efforts directed at improving patient compliance and renal allograft monitoring.
Allografts
;
Creatinine
;
Graft Survival*
;
Humans
;
Kidney Transplantation
;
Patient Compliance
;
Prognosis
;
Survival Rate
;
Transplants*
2.The Change of Cardiac Function and Morphology after Mitral Valve Repair Surgery in Mitral Valve Prolapse with Mitral Regurgitation.
Seong Yeol KIM ; Kee Sik KIM ; Taeck Keun KWON ; Yeong Soo LEE ; Bong Kee CHO ; Bong Jun SON ; Mee Sook KANG ; Myeong Hee NAM ; Yoon Nyun KIM ; Kwon Bae KIM
Journal of the Korean Society of Echocardiography 2000;8(2):182-190
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although it is well known that mitral valve repair provides a better postoperative outcome than valve replacement for mitral valve prolapse with mitral regurgitation, there haven't been much studied the nature of remnant regurgitation and the change of heart function and structure by remnant regurgitation after mitral valve repair surgery. We tried to research for it. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective analysis of echocardiographic data and medical records was done in patients who underwent repair surgery for mitral valve prolapse with significant mitral regurgitation at the Keimyung University Dong-san Medical Center from February 1996 to February 2000. Patients who underwent echocardiography before and after the surgery were selected for the analysis. Of patients who underwent mitral valve repair surgery for mitral valve prolapse with mitral regurgitation during that period, 30 patients (male 15, female 15) were included in this study. The average age of them was 44.30+/-14.30 year old. After surgery, heart chamber size was decreased significantly in all patients (e. g. LVDd 6.25+/-1.06 cm vs. 5.14+/-0.62 cm, LV mass 272.46+/-107.36 gm vs. 197.30+/-75.16 gm). Remnant mitral regurgitation after repair surgery was found in 22 patients (73.3%). Remnant mitral regurgitation above trivial flow was found in 10 patients. Such case as involving ant. leaflet was found in 5 patients (16.7%), as involving post. leaflet, in 2 patients (6.7%), as involving both leaflet, in 3 patients (10%) among 10 ones. Eccentric flow among remnant regurgitation, was observed in 2 patients who underwent repair surgery for ant. leaflet, 1 patient who underwent repair surgery for both leaflet. CONCLUSION: Mitral valve repair surgery reduce the left ventricular chamber size and left ventricular mass. Postoperatively, patients who involve ant. leaflet were much remnant regurgitation above trivial flow more than others.
Ants
;
Echocardiography
;
Female
;
Heart
;
Humans
;
Medical Records
;
Mitral Valve Insufficiency*
;
Mitral Valve Prolapse*
;
Mitral Valve*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Thoracic Surgery