1.Activation of Neutrophil Menbrane Phospholipase D by Soluble Proteins: Comparison of Cytosolic Neutrophil 50 kDa Factor , ADP-ribosylation Factor and a Novel Brain Factor.
Yong KIM ; Jong Young KWAK ; Tae Hoon G LEE ; Isabel LOPEZ ; J David LAMETH ; Pann Ghill SHU ; Sung Ho RYU
Korean Journal of Immunology 1999;21(3):183-191
GTPrS-dependent phospholipase D activity in human neutrophils was investigated using exogenous phospholipid as a substrate. Both cytosolic and membrane- associated phospholipase D activities were identified. The previously described 50 kDa cytosolic activating factor was resolved chromatographically from the cytosolic phospholipase D. Using exogenous phospholipid as substrate along with chromatographically resolved 50 kDa factor and recombinant ADP-ribosylation factor 1, plasma membrane was required for activity, indicating that the activity which was previously seen using endogenous phospholipid substrate was due to a phospholipase D located in the plasma membrane. In addition, ADP-ribosylation factor and the 50 kDa factor activated synergistically. Using neutrophil plasma membranes, a third regulator of neutrophil membrane phospholipase D was identified from bovine brain cytosol. This factor was resolved from ADP-ribosylation factor and Rho A by successive column chromatographies. The brain factor showed a synergistic effect with the 50 kDa neutrophil activator but an additive effect with recombinant ADP- ribosylation factor. Whether or not ADP-ribosylation factor or the brain factor were present, high activities were seen only when the 50 kDa factor was present, indicating that the 50 kDa cytosolic factor is a major activating factor for the neutrophil plasma membrane phospholipase D.
ADP-Ribosylation Factor 1
;
ADP-Ribosylation Factors*
;
Brain*
;
Cell Membrane
;
Chromatography
;
Cytosol*
;
Fibrinogen
;
Humans
;
Membranes
;
Neutrophils*
;
Phospholipase D*
;
Phospholipases*
2.Synopsis on Clinical Practice Guideline of Gastric Cancer in Korea: An Evidence-Based Approach.
Jun Haeng LEE ; Jae G KIM ; Hye Kyung JUNG ; Jung Hoon KIM ; Woo Kyoung JEONG ; Tae Joo JEON ; Joon Mee KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Keun Won RYU ; Seong Ho KONG ; Hyoung Il KIM ; Hwoon Yong JUNG ; Yong Sik KIM ; Dae Young ZANG ; Jae Yong CHO ; Joon Oh PARK ; Do Hoon LIM ; Eun Sun JUNG ; Hyeong Sik AHN ; Hyun Jung KIM
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2014;63(2):66-81
Although, gastric cancer is quite common in Korea, the treatment outcome is relatively favorable compared to that of Western countries. However, there is no Korean multidisciplinary guideline for gastric cancer and thus, a guideline adequate for domestic circumstances is required. Experts from related societies developed 22 recommendation statements for the diagnosis (n=9) and treatment (n=13) based on relevant key questions. Evidence levels based on systematic review of literatures were classified as five levels from A to E, and recommendation grades were classified as either strong or weak. The topics of this guideline cover diagnostic modalities (endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, radiologic diagnosis), treatment modalities (surgery, therapeutic endoscopy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) and pathologic evaluation. External review of the guideline was conducted at the finalization phase.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
;
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
;
Endosonography
;
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Gastrectomy
;
Humans
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Positron-Emission Tomography
;
Republic of Korea
;
Stomach Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/therapy
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3.Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer in Korea: An Evidence-Based Approach.
Jun Haeng LEE ; Jae G KIM ; Hye Kyung JUNG ; Jung Hoon KIM ; Woo Kyoung JEONG ; Tae Joo JEON ; Joon Mee KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Keun Won RYU ; Seong Ho KONG ; Hyoung Il KIM ; Hwoon Yong JUNG ; Yong Sik KIM ; Dae Young ZANG ; Jae Yong CHO ; Joon Oh PARK ; Do Hoon LIM ; Eun Sun JUNG ; Hyeong Sik AHN ; Hyun Jung KIM
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2014;14(2):87-104
Although gastric cancer is quite common in Korea, the treatment outcome is relatively favorable compared to those in western countries. However, there are currently no Korean multidisciplinary guidelines for gastric cancer. Experts from related societies developed guidelines de novo to meet Korean circumstances and requirements, including 23 recommendation statements for diagnosis (n=9) and treatment (n=14) based on relevant key questions. The quality of the evidence was rated according to the GRADE evidence evaluation framework: the evidence levels were based on a systematic review of the literature, and the recommendation grades were classified as either strong or weak. The applicability of the guidelines was considered to meet patients' view and preferences in the context of Korea. The topics of the guidelines cover diagnostic modalities (endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and radiologic diagnosis), treatment modalities (surgery, therapeutic endoscopy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy), and pathologic evaluation. An external review of the guidelines was conducted during the finalization phase.
Diagnosis
;
Drug Therapy
;
Endoscopy
;
Korea
;
Stomach Neoplasms*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Ultrasonography