1.The Efficacy and Safety of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners.
Journal of Korean Diabetes 2015;16(4):281-286
High intake of added sugars increases the risk for obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) are widely used in many beverages and food products to reduce calories and sugar content. NNS have higher intensity of sweetness per gram than caloric sweeteners such as sucrose, corn syrup, and fruit juice concentrates. NNS approved for use have been tested and determined to be safe at levels that are within acceptable daily intake by the Joint Food Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives. The eight items of sweeteners are regulated as food additives in Korea. Dietary intake of the sweeteners was suggested as safety level by the ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2012. If substituted for caloric sweeteners without intake of additional calories from other food sources, NNS may help consumers limit carbohydrate and energy intake as a strategy to manage blood glucose and weight. Dietitians can provide guidance on the use of NNS that give the desired results in food preparation and use at the table.
Agriculture
;
Blood Glucose
;
Carbohydrates
;
Cardiovascular Diseases
;
Diabetes Mellitus
;
Energy Intake
;
Food Additives
;
Food and Beverages
;
Fruit
;
Joints
;
Korea
;
No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level
;
Non-Nutritive Sweeteners*
;
Nutritionists
;
Obesity
;
Sucrose
;
Sweetening Agents
;
Zea mays
2.Reduced Calorie Sweetener Use Does Not Adversely Affect Gastrointestinal Health and Function.
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2016;22(4):709-709
No abstract available.
Sweetening Agents*
3.Effect of fructose or sucrose feeding with different levels on oral glucose tolerance test in normal and type 2 diabetic rats.
Sanghee KWON ; You Jin KIM ; Mi Kyung KIM
Nutrition Research and Practice 2008;2(4):252-258
This study was designed to determine whether acute fructose or sucrose administration at different levels (0.05 g/kg, 0.1 g/kg or 0.4 g/kg body weight) might affect oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in normal and type 2 diabetic rats. In OGTT, there were no significant differences in glucose responses between acute fructose- and sucrose-administered groups. However, in normal rats, the AUCs of the blood glucose response for the fructose-administered groups tended to be lower than those of the control and sucrose-administered groups. The AUCs of the lower levels fructoseor sucrose-administered groups tended to be smaller than those of higher levels fructose- or sucrose-administered groups. In type 2 diabetic rats, only the AUC of the lowest level of fructose-administered (0.05 g/kg body weight) group was slightly smaller than that of the control group. The AUCs of fructose-administered groups tended to be smaller than those of the sucrose-administered groups, and the AUCs of lower levels fructose-administered groups tended to be smaller than those fed higher levels of fructose. We concluded from this experiment that fructose has tendency to be more effective in blood glucose regulation than sucrose, and moreover, that smaller amount of fructose is preferred to larger amount. Specifically, our experiments indicated that the fructose level of 0.05 g/kg body weight as dietary supplement was the most effective amount for blood glucose regulation from the pool of 0.05 g/kg, 0.1 g/kg and 0.4 g/kg body weights. Therefore, our results suggest the use of fructose as the substitute sweetener for sucrose, which may be beneficial for blood glucose regulation.
Animals
;
Area Under Curve
;
Blood Glucose
;
Body Weight
;
Dietary Supplements
;
Fructose
;
Glucose
;
Glucose Tolerance Test
;
Rats
;
Sucrose
;
Sweetening Agents
4.Allergic Diseases in Childhood and Food Additives.
Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease 2010;20(4):212-218
Many different additives are added to the food which we consume and the number of additives are estimated ranges from 2,000 to 20,000. These substances include preservatives, stabilizers, conditioners, thickeners, colorings, flavorings, sweeteners, and antioxidants. Despite the multitude of additives known, only a surprisingly small number have been associated with hypersensitivity reactions.
Antioxidants
;
Dermatitis, Atopic
;
Food Additives
;
Food Hypersensitivity
;
Hypersensitivity
;
Sweetening Agents
5.A Noisy Carbohydrate Addiction.
Sung Wan CHUN ; So Hun KIM ; Chong Hwa KIM ; Seo Young SOHN ; Kyu Jeung AHN ; Suk CHON ; Dong Hyeok CHO ; You Cheol HWANG
Journal of Korean Diabetes 2016;17(3):147-154
Carbohydrates are a primary source of energy and a major component of the structure of living things-; there are many different kinds. As eating behavior is a part of life, it was usually not described in addiction. However, sometimes it seems aspects of addiction. This eating behavior can also appear with regard to other food. A bio-psycho-social model is required for complex analysis of addiction. When highly addictive agents are excluded, we can usually identify a key factor related to the vulnerability of the individual to addictive behavior. Considering that every source of happiness can potentially lead to addictive behaviors, we need to be cautious about the controlling. Not every carbohydrate can be connected with addictive behavior. Addictive behavior could be associated with a variety of ingredients other than carbohydrates. Until recently, sweet substances were thought to be the primary culprit behind addictive behavior. It is necessary to identify the food component or other factors associated with a specific craving. A multidimensional approach to the psychology of addictive behaviors might be more useful than opposing carbohydrate consumption in general.
Behavior, Addictive
;
Carbohydrates
;
Craving
;
Feeding Behavior
;
Happiness
;
Psychology
;
Sweetening Agents
6.Why the "sugars" in traditional Unani formulations are a pivotal component: A viewpoint perspective.
Journal of Integrative Medicine 2022;20(2):91-95
Traditional medicine systems around the globe, like Unani, Ayurveda and traditional Chinese medicine, include a number of sugar-based formulations, which contain a large amount of saccharide-containing sweetener, such as honey, sucrose or jaggery. With pervasive lifestyle disorders throughout the world, there have been discussions to consider alternative sweetening agents. Here, from the perspective of Unani medicine, we discuss how the saccharide-based sweeteners may be an essential component of these traditional preparations, like electuaries, which may be deprived of their bioactivities without these saccharides. With contemporary researches, it is known that apart from their own therapeutic effects, saccharides also form deep eutectic solvents which help in enhancing the bioactivity of other ingredients present in crude drugs. In addition, they provide energy for fermentation which is essential for biotransformation of compounds. Interestingly, the sugars also increase the shelf-life of these compound drugs and act as natural preservatives. On the basis of this review, we strongly believe that saccharide-based sweeteners are an essential component of traditional medicines and not merely an excipient.
Medicine, Ayurvedic
;
Medicine, Traditional
;
Medicine, Unani
;
Sugars
;
Sweetening Agents
7.Scientific consensus on food sweeteners (2022).
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2023;57(4):457-460
Sweeteners are a kind of food additives, which can give food a sweet taste with little or no energy and provide a variety of options for people who have sugar control needs. Due to their stable process performance and good safety, they have been widely used in food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetics industries worldwide in the past 100 years. The safety of sweeteners is based on strict food safety risk assessment, which has been affirmed by many international organizations, national/regional food safety risk assessment agencies and food safety management authorities. The proper use of sweeteners can provide sweetness, be beneficial to control energy intake, reduce the risk of dental caries, and provide more food choices for people with hyperglycemia or diabetes.
Humans
;
Consensus
;
Dental Caries
;
Food Additives
;
Sweetening Agents
;
Energy Intake
8.Effect of xylobiose-sugar mixture on defecation frequency and symptoms in young women with constipation.
Jung Sug LEE ; A Reum KIM ; Hye Kyoung NAM ; Myungok KYUNG ; Sung Eun JO ; Moon Jeong CHANG
Journal of Nutrition and Health 2017;50(1):41-52
PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of xylobiose-sugar mixture intake on defecation frequency and constipation symptoms in 31 young women with constipation. METHODS: Thirty-one subjects were assigned to two groups, and subjects in each group were administered 10 g of a 7% xylobiose-sugar mixture (Experiment 1: XBS, n = 15) or 10 g of a 7% xylobiose-sugar mixture containing coffee mix (Experiment 2: XBS coffee mix, n = 16) twice per day for 6 weeks. During the study, clinical efficacy was assessed by a daily diary record. The subjects recorded their defecation frequency and fecal characteristics. RESULTS: During pretreatment week, mean defecation frequency of XBS subjects was 2.13 times/week, whereas that of XBS coffee mix subjects was 1.56 times/week. The mean defecation frequencies of XBS and XBS coffee mix subjects increased significantly to 3.73 times/week (p < 0.05) and 3.56 times/week by week 6 (p < 0.05), respectively. After treatment with either XBS or XBS coffee mix, patients presented significant improvements in their amounts of stool, feelings of residual stool leftness, and abdominal pain symptoms (p < 0.05). The total constipation scoring system (CSS) for diagnosing constipation symptoms significantly decreased in the XBS group (10.53 score vs 7.22 score) and in the XBS coffee mix group (10.75 score vs 6.51 score) after 6 weeks. Improvement due to intake of 7% xylobiose-containing sugar seemed to last during the experimental period. CONCLUSION: The addition of approximately 7% xylobiose to commercially available sweeteners has been shown to improve constipation.
Abdominal Pain
;
Coffee
;
Constipation*
;
Defecation*
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Sweetening Agents
;
Treatment Outcome
9.Comparison of mRNA expression of gtf genes and adhesive ability of xylitol-sensitive and -resistant Streptococcus mutans by xylitol-treated concentrations.
Sang Uk IM ; Seo Young AN ; Youn Hee CHOI ; Keun Bae SONG
Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health 2012;36(2):91-96
OBJECTIVES: Xylitol is an effective anticarious natural sugar substitute, by inhibiting the virulence of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans). However, long-term xylitol consumption leads to an emergence of the xylitol-resistant (XR) strains. This study aimed to confirm the general characteristics, mRNA expression of gtf genes, and adhesive ability of the xylitol-sensitive (XS) and XR S. mutans , by xylitol-treated concentrations. METHODS: S. mutans KCTC3065 was maintained in TYE medium, containing 0.4% glucose with 1% xylitol for 30 days at 37degrees C, 10% CO2 to form XR strain and the same procedures, without xylitol, were repeated for the formation of XS S. mutans. Both XS and XR were cultured by xylitol-treated concentrations (0%, 0.1% and 1%), then, general characteristics, such as growth and acid production, mRNA expression of gtf genes and adhesive ability were analyzed. RESULTS: Xylitol reduced the cell growth of XS S. mutans in a dose-dependent manner, but did not reduce the XR. Xylitol inhibited acid production of XS in a dose-dependent manner. However, it did not inhibit that of XR. Xylitol reduced the gtfB and gtfD mRNA expression of the XS S. mutans, which the genes synthesized soluble and insoluble extracellular polysaccharides, but not reduced that of the XR. By a microtiter plate assay, biofilm formation was more reduced in the XR strains, which means biofilm's adhesive ability of XR S. mutans was lower than that of the XS. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a lower level of adhesive ability for XR S. mutans is related with mRNA expression level of gtf genes, which suggested that the XR strains may be less cariogenic than that of the XS.
Adhesives
;
Biofilms
;
Glucose
;
Glucosyltransferases
;
Polysaccharides
;
RNA, Messenger
;
Sprains and Strains
;
Streptococcus
;
Streptococcus mutans
;
Sweetening Agents
;
Xylitol
10.Artificial Sweeteners: A Systematic Review and Primer for Gastroenterologists.
Marisa SPENCER ; Amit GUPTA ; Lauren VAN DAM ; Carol SHANNON ; Stacy MENEES ; William D CHEY
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2016;22(2):168-180
Artificial sweeteners (AS) are ubiquitous in food and beverage products, yet little is known about their effects on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and whether they play a role in the development of GI symptoms, especially in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Utilizing the PubMed and Embase databases, we conducted a search for articles on individual AS and each of these terms: fermentation, absorption, and GI tract. Standard protocols for a systematic review were followed. At the end of our search, we found a total of 617 eligible papers, 26 of which were included. Overall, there is limited medical literature available on this topic. The 2 main areas on which there is data to suggest that AS affect the GI tract include motility and the gut microbiome, though human data is lacking, and most of the currently available data is derived from in vivo studies. The effect on motility is mainly indirect via increased incretin secretion, though the clinical relevance of this finding is unknown as the downstream effect on motility was not studied. The specific effects of AS on the microbiome have been conflicting and the available studies have been heterogeneous in terms of the population studied and both the AS and doses evaluated. Further research is needed to assess whether AS could be a potential cause of GI symptoms. This is especially pertinent in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, a population in whom dietary interventions are routinely utilized as a management strategy.
Absorption
;
Beverages
;
Fermentation
;
Gastrointestinal Tract
;
Humans
;
Incretins
;
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
;
Microbiota
;
Sweetening Agents*