1.Encapsulated papillary carcinoma, apocrine type, of the breast.
Kuroda, Naoto ; Fujishima, Noriaki ; Hayes, Malcolm M ; Moritani, Suzuko ; Ichihara, Shu
The Malaysian Journal of Pathology 2014;36(2):139-43
The apocrine type of encapsulated papillary carcinoma (ECP-A), of the breast is a rare neoplasm and there are only eight cases reported to date. Herein, we report the ninth case. A 68-year-old Japanese woman presented with a left breast mass. The cytoplasm of the tumour cells showed positive immunostaining for GCDFP-15. Myoepithelial cells were absent within the papillary structures and at the periphery of the lesion. The clinical course of the patient was uneventful 11 months after surgery. We postulate that EPC-A belongs to the molecular apocrine type of breast carcinoma.
2.Comparison of postoperative adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and no further therapy after radical surgery in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer
Hiroki NISHIMURA ; Tsukuru AMANO ; Yutaka YONEOKA ; Shunichiro TSUJI ; Yukiko TAGA ; Megumi AKI ; Masaya UNO ; Suzuko MORITANI ; Ryusuke MURAKAMI ; Tomoyasu KATO ; Takashi MURAKAMI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(1):e2-
Objective:
To identify a relatively high-risk population in postoperative intermediate-risk cervical cancer and evaluate the effect of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT).
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer who had been treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and classified as the intermediate-risk group for recurrence by postoperative pathological examination from January 2007 to December 2018 at 3 medical centers in Japan. First, patients with intermediate-risk were stratified by histological type and the number of intermediaterisk factors (IRF; large tumor diameter, lymph vascular space invasion, and deep cervical stromal invasion) and then divided into 2 groups: high and low-risk population (estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival [RFS] rate with no further therapy [NFT] <90% and ≥90%, respectively). Second, the efficacy of CT for the high-risk population was evaluated by comparing RFS and overall survival (OS) between the patients receiving CT and those with NFT.
Results:
In total, 133 patients were included in the analysis. Among patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with all IRF or those with non-SCC with 2 to 3 IRF, the 5-year estimated RFS was <90% when treated with NFT. In this population, adjuvant CT was significantly superior to NFT regarding RFS (log-rank, p=0.014), although there was no statistical difference in OS.
Conclusion
Patients with SCC with all 3 IRFs and those with non-SCC with 2 to 3 IRFs were at high risk for recurrence. Adjuvant CT is a valid treatment option for these populations.
3.Comparison of postoperative adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and no further therapy after radical surgery in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer
Hiroki NISHIMURA ; Tsukuru AMANO ; Yutaka YONEOKA ; Shunichiro TSUJI ; Yukiko TAGA ; Megumi AKI ; Masaya UNO ; Suzuko MORITANI ; Ryusuke MURAKAMI ; Tomoyasu KATO ; Takashi MURAKAMI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(1):e2-
Objective:
To identify a relatively high-risk population in postoperative intermediate-risk cervical cancer and evaluate the effect of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT).
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer who had been treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and classified as the intermediate-risk group for recurrence by postoperative pathological examination from January 2007 to December 2018 at 3 medical centers in Japan. First, patients with intermediate-risk were stratified by histological type and the number of intermediaterisk factors (IRF; large tumor diameter, lymph vascular space invasion, and deep cervical stromal invasion) and then divided into 2 groups: high and low-risk population (estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival [RFS] rate with no further therapy [NFT] <90% and ≥90%, respectively). Second, the efficacy of CT for the high-risk population was evaluated by comparing RFS and overall survival (OS) between the patients receiving CT and those with NFT.
Results:
In total, 133 patients were included in the analysis. Among patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with all IRF or those with non-SCC with 2 to 3 IRF, the 5-year estimated RFS was <90% when treated with NFT. In this population, adjuvant CT was significantly superior to NFT regarding RFS (log-rank, p=0.014), although there was no statistical difference in OS.
Conclusion
Patients with SCC with all 3 IRFs and those with non-SCC with 2 to 3 IRFs were at high risk for recurrence. Adjuvant CT is a valid treatment option for these populations.
4.Comparison of postoperative adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and no further therapy after radical surgery in intermediate-risk early-stage cervical cancer
Hiroki NISHIMURA ; Tsukuru AMANO ; Yutaka YONEOKA ; Shunichiro TSUJI ; Yukiko TAGA ; Megumi AKI ; Masaya UNO ; Suzuko MORITANI ; Ryusuke MURAKAMI ; Tomoyasu KATO ; Takashi MURAKAMI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(1):e2-
Objective:
To identify a relatively high-risk population in postoperative intermediate-risk cervical cancer and evaluate the effect of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT).
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer who had been treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and classified as the intermediate-risk group for recurrence by postoperative pathological examination from January 2007 to December 2018 at 3 medical centers in Japan. First, patients with intermediate-risk were stratified by histological type and the number of intermediaterisk factors (IRF; large tumor diameter, lymph vascular space invasion, and deep cervical stromal invasion) and then divided into 2 groups: high and low-risk population (estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival [RFS] rate with no further therapy [NFT] <90% and ≥90%, respectively). Second, the efficacy of CT for the high-risk population was evaluated by comparing RFS and overall survival (OS) between the patients receiving CT and those with NFT.
Results:
In total, 133 patients were included in the analysis. Among patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with all IRF or those with non-SCC with 2 to 3 IRF, the 5-year estimated RFS was <90% when treated with NFT. In this population, adjuvant CT was significantly superior to NFT regarding RFS (log-rank, p=0.014), although there was no statistical difference in OS.
Conclusion
Patients with SCC with all 3 IRFs and those with non-SCC with 2 to 3 IRFs were at high risk for recurrence. Adjuvant CT is a valid treatment option for these populations.