1.Factors Related to Improving Activities of Daily Living and Life-Space Mobility through Visiting Rehabilitation Services : A Multi-Institutional Study in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan
Yumiko KAMIOKA ; Hideyuki SAITO ; Yayoi IIJIMA ; Tadahiro HOSOTA ; Tomoyuki MATSUDA ; Yuuji MIURA ; Motohide ARITA ; Takashi ISAJI ; Susumu KOSEKI
The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2013;50(10):831-839
Objective : This study aimed to investigate the changes in the functioning of users of visiting rehabilitation services and related factors. Methods: Among 107 users in 22 visiting rehabilitation centers, we analyzed the data of 80 who completed the 6-month study. Their Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Life-Space Assessment (LSA), and level of caregiver burden (J-ZBI_8) were compared at the commencement of this study, and at 3 and 6 months afterwards. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to examine the factors related to the variables, which changed over 6 months. Results : Over a period of 6 months from the commencement of the study, we found that FIM and LSA scores significantly improved from 82.4 to 87.3 (p=0.016) and from 9.9 to 12.3 (p=0.05), respectively, in the group who were still within 1 year from the time since onset/injury. A multiple regression analysis revealed that the period of time since onset/injury, independence degree of daily living for the demented elderly, and presence of goal setting for activities of daily living/domestic work significantly influenced changes in total FIM scores (p=0.001, R2=0.32). Furthermore, the change in LSA scores was significantly influenced by gender, presence of cerebrovascular diseases, period of time since onset/injury, number of occupations involved in visiting rehabilitation services, and J-ZBI_8 scores (p=0.0001, R2=0.36). Conclusion : Effective visiting rehabilitation requires having appropriate goals set for daily living activities and the establishment of interprofessional collaboration within visiting rehabilitation centers.
2.Optimal Timing to Assess Drain Amylase Concentration after Elective Gastrectomy
Tomoyuki WAKAHARA ; Kiyonori KANEMITSU ; Susumu MIURA ; Shinobu TSUCHIDA ; Takeshi IWASAKI ; Mitsuru SASAKO
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2021;21(1):30-37
Purpose:
While the amylase concentration of the drainage fluid (dAmy) has been reported to be a predictor of postoperative pancreas-related complications (PPRC), the optimal timing for its measurement has not been fully investigated.
Materials and Methods:
The clinicopathological data of 387 patients who underwent elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer were reviewed. Laboratory data, including dAmy on postoperative days 1 (dAmy1) and 3 (dAmy3), and serum C-reactive protein (sCRP) concentrations on postoperative days 1 (sCRP1) and 3 (sCRP3) were compared between patients with PPRC and without PPRC.
Results:
Nineteen of the 387 patients (4.9%) developed PPRC. The optimal cutoff values of dAmy1, dAmy3, sCRP1, and sCRP3 were 1514 IU/L, 761 IU/L, 8.32 mg/dL, and 15.15 mg/dL, respectively. The area under the curve of dAmy1 was greater than that of dAmy3 (0.915 vs.0.826), and that of sCRP3 was greater than that of sCRP1 (0.820 vs. 0.659). In the multivariate analysis, dAmy1 (P<0.001) and sCRP3 (P=0.004) were significant predictors of PPRC, while dAmy3 (P=0.069) and sCRP1 (P=0.831) were not. Thirteen (41.9%) of 31 patients with both dAmy1 ≥1,545 IU/L and sCRP3 ≥15.15 mg/dL had PPRC ≥Clavien-Dindo II. In contrast, among 260 patients with both dAmy1 <1,545 IU/L and sCRP3 <15.15 mg/dL, none developed PPRC.
Conclusions
dAmy1 was more useful than dAmy3 in predicting PPRC. The combination of dAmy1 and sCRP3 may be a useful criterion for the removal of drains on postoperative day 3.
3.Introducing Problem-Based Learning Tutorials into a Traditional Curriculum.
Ariyuki HORI ; Yoshimichi UEDA ; Noriko AINODA ; Shinobu MATSUI ; Katsuyuki MIURA ; Katsuhito MIYAZAWA ; Toru NAGANO ; Mikihiro TSUTSUMI ; Susumu SUGAI ; Koji SUZUKI ; Noboru TAKEKOSHI
Medical Education 2003;34(6):403-412
Problem-based learning (PBL) tutorials were introduced at our university in April 2001. Because a complete PBLbased curriculum could not be adopted, a transitional curriculum incorporating 3-hour PBL tutorial sessions into the traditional curriculum was introduced. More than 80% of students agreed that PBL is an effective way of learning problem solving at the bedside. Twenty percent to 40% of teachers felt that students who took PBL were more motivated for bedside learning and self-directed learning and had better at presentation than were students who did not take PBL. Because of 80% of the curriculum comprised didactic lectures, most students considered PBL tutorials a type of lecture. For this reason, motivating students to learn additional material originating from PBL tutorials was difficult. Although the combination of a traditional curriculum and PBL tutorials may appear to be a new curriculum, this type of PBL has limited value as a method for studying problem solving.