Background: Malaysia is the first country in the Western Pacific Region to receive the validation certificate for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The validation report recommends making sexual and reproductive health and rights of women living with HIV a priority. This article explores and assesses the sexual and reproductive health, rights, and access to healthcare services of Malaysia’s women living with HIV (WLHIV). Methods: A qualitative secondary analysis conducted on 73 WLHIV from all over Malaysia comprised 11 in-depth interviews and 16 focus group discussions. Data were extracted from the original interview transcripts that emerged from the following questions: (1) “What are your experiences as a woman living with HIV in relation to your sexual and reproductive health and rights?” (2) “What are your experiences in accessing contraception?” (3) “What are your day-to-day experiences as a woman living with HIV?” Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Four themes emerged from the study findings: “lack of negotiation,” “idealism in pregnancy,” “coping with restrictions,” and “past and future fears.” The four themes are grounded in religion, a patriarchal culture, meaning and expectations of motherhood, taking risks and going against medical advice to pursue fertility desires, fear of HIV transmission, and the side effects of contraceptive use. Conclusion The complexities involved in decision-making regarding contraceptive use revealed how WLHIV may have unresolved reproductive health needs inconsistent with healthcare providers’ focus on HIV management and prevention. Suggestions are made for improving the sexual and reproductive health and rights of WLHIV in Malaysia, which include establishing a reproductive health counseling program.

Background: The need for client feedback in assessing healthcare services is widely recognized. However, little is known about the satisfaction of adolescent clients utilizing healthcare services in Malaysia. To the best of our knowledge, there is no validated instrument to measure the satisfaction of adolescent clients attending health clinics in Malaysia. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the reliability of the Malay version of the Malaysian Ministry of Health’s Adolescent Client Satisfaction Questionnaire among adolescents attending health clinics in northeastern Malaysia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in January 2019 among adolescents aged 10–19 years attending four designated health clinics in the northeastern state of Peninsular Malaysia. The test for Cronbach’s α was performed to determine the internal consistency reliability. Results: There were a total of 85 adolescent clients involved in this study. The mean age of respondents was 15.6 years. The majority of respondents were female, Malay, students, and had attained a secondary level of education. The mean total satisfaction score was 78.35. The internal consistency reliability according to the Cronbach’s α of the domain was 0.854, which is considered highly reliable. The corrected item-total correlation for the domain was acceptable as it was ≥0.4. Conclusion The Malay version of the Malaysian Ministry of Health’s Adolescent Client Satisfaction Questionnaire has excellent internal consistency reliability. Therefore, it may be recommended as a tool to measure the satisfaction level among adolescents attending health clinics in Malaysia.

The article introduces readers to the Master of Public Health and Doctor of Public Health programmes, offered by the Department of Community Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia. The programme vision, structure and accomplishments over the decade are presented to provide an understanding of the programme. It is hoped that this professional programme will continue to flourish and produce new generations of public health medicine specialist equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills to make significant contribution towards improving the health of the population.

Introduction: A casemix system measures costs of health service provision that is crucial in the planning and hospital budgeting. The MalaysianDRG casemix system has been implemented since 2010, yet many health professionals were unaware of its importance. To highlight this problem, we estimated the miscalculation of costs in providing treatment, that occurred due to inaccurate clinical documentation and coding error in the MalaysianDRG casemix system. Methods: Using a cross-sectional study design, 226 coded case notes from two healthcare institutions in Malaysia were selected and re-coded. If a difference between codes was observed, the new code would be chosen as the final code. The cases were then re-grouped using the MalaysianDRG casemix system. The cost per case derived from the new and original codes was compared. Then, the outcomes were verified by a casemix expert from the Ministry of Health. Results: Results indicated 61.9% inaccurate clinical documentation and 25.2% coding error. The difference in costs of treatment provision, due to inaccurate clinical documentation was RM227,657 and RM 68,216 for coding error. Using paired t-test analysis, differences between mean (SD) cost per case of the original vs. new codes due to inaccurate clinical documentation [RM10,208.19(12273) vs. RM11,244.53(13785.27), p<0.05], and coding error [RM10,208.19(12273.04) vs. RM11,215.52(13798.03) p<0.05] were statistically significant. These results raised important questions regarding costly financial implications arising from inaccurate clinical documentation and coding error in the MalaysianDRG casemix system. Conclusion: To achieve the full benefit of the MalaysianDRG casemix system, the quality and accuracy of its data must first be established.

Introduction: The Ministry of Health (MOH) implemented the MalaysianDRG casemix system in 2010, and two national target indicators on the accuracy and completeness of clinical documentation were introduced to measure its performance. This study aims to show the trend of casemix performance in MOH hospitals and to explore the challenges in meeting these targets. Methods: The study design was sequential explanatory mixed-method design. First, a cross-sectional study described the trend of casemix performance in five MOH hospitals in Malaysia. Second, a single holistic case study of the hospital with the lowest casemix system performance was conducted to explore the perceptions of clinicians regarding the MalaysianDRG casemix and the challenges pertaining to clinical documentation. Purposive sampling was employed, and the case study data collection was carried out using in-depth-interviews, observation, and document reviews. Results: Two hospitals achieved the target in the accuracy of clinical documentation for the main condition (≥90%). For completeness in clinical documentation, four out of five MOH hospitals performed below the target (≤ 60%). Thematic analysis of the data found poor commitment of clinicians towards casemix and a multitude of obstacles in performing clinical documentations. Conclusion: After a decade of its implementation, the performance of the MalaysianDRG casemix system in MOH hospitals is still moderate due to inaccurate and incomplete clinical documentations. The study findings may be used to spread awareness and devise tailored solutions to assist clinicians in paving the way towards future excellence in MalaysianDRG casemix system.

The flood disaster in Kelantan in 2014 had resulted in substantial health implications including increased cases of communicable diseases. There was a lack of community preparedness including customized health educations in the prevention and control of flood-related communicable diseases in the affected areas. The research was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of community-based health education modules on flood-related communicable diseases among communities in Kelantan. Health education modules focusing on major food-related diseases were developed. A non-randomized community-controlled trial using the modules were conducted. Outcomes were assessed on knowledge, attitude and preventive practice scores to flood-related communicable diseases using a pre-validated questionnaire. Independent t test was used to compare mean scores between the intervention community (Tumpat) and the control community (Bachok) at 1-month post intervention. One-way independent ANOVA test was done to compare score differences at baseline (pre), post 1-month and post 2-month from repeated surveys among random samples within the intervention community. There were significant improvements in all knowledge components from 9.4% to 52.6% with 10% increment in attitude scores toward preventing behaviours on flood-related communicable diseases. When compared against the control community at one-month post-intervention, there were significantly higher knowledge on types of diseases, symptoms and risk factors as well as practice scores of drinking safe water and protective habits. This research demonstrated that community-based health education is effective in improving relevant knowledge, attitude and preventive practices among affected communities as part of their preparedness toward communicable diseases related to flood.

Introduction: Eating out has always been associated with increasing cases of food poisoning. These problems can be minimized through mobile applications and technology development. A mobile application called MyWarung© was developed to provide an alternative, improved tool for improving food poisoning knowledge and preventive behaviour. Methods: This cross-sectional study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptance of the MyWarung© application for consumers in Terengganu. The 50 consumers were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria using convenience non-probability sampling. The data were collected through a questionnaire that included three components: socio-demographic, feasible (6 components) and acceptable (7 components). The scoring above 80.0% indicates an acceptable, while lower than 80.0% show unacceptable for both feasibility and acceptability sections. SPSS 22.0 has analyzed the data. Results: The results showed excellent feasibility with a median score of 27.5 (IQR 6.0) out of 30.0, and acceptance with 32.0 (IQR 7.0) out of 35.0. Majority of the respondents agreed that the app is easy to use (94.0%), easy to understand (88.0%), attractive (84.0%), catchy (88.0%), provides more information (96.0%), efficient (96.0%), knowledge improvement (96.0%), beneficial (100.0%), useful application (88.0%), and recommend to the other people (84.0%). The overall result showed that most respondents agreed that MyWarung© application was feasible and acceptable with 90.0% and 86.0% feasibility and acceptability rate. Conclusion: The MyWarung© application among consumers can be highly feasible and acceptable in preventing food poisoning during dining out.