OBJECTIVETo investigate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic single antibiotic administration in selective open colorectal surgery.

METHODSTwo hundred and seventy-five patients undergoing selective open colorectal surgery in the Peking Union Medical College Hospital from October 2009 to October 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Prophylatic single antibiotic administration was used by intravenous infusion 30-60 min before incision. No antibiotics would be given after operation if there was no surgical site infection(SSI). According to the incidence of postoperative SSI, unexplained use of antibiotics, anastomotic leakage and distant-site infection, the clinical outcome was assessed to be prophylactic success, prophylactic failure or distant-site infection, respectively.

RESULTSThere was no intraoperative or postoperative antibiotics related drug anaphylaxis in all the 275 patients. By prophylactic single antibiotic administration, there were prophylactic success in 243 patients(88.4%,243/275), prophylactic failure in 23(8.4%,23/275), distant-site infection in 9(3.3%,9/275). In the 23 patients with failed prophylaxis, there were SSI in 13(4.7%,13/275) patients, postoperative use of broad-spectrum antibiotics for unexplained fever in 2(0.7%,2/275), postoperative anastomotic leakage in 8(3.6%,8/222).

CONCLUSIONProphylactic single antibiotic administration in selective open colorectal surgery is safe and effective.

Anti-Bacterial Agents ; therapeutic use ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Colorectal Surgery ; Humans ; Incidence ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Wound Infection ; epidemiology ; prevention & control

Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of modified Snodgrass surgical technique in the treatment of hypospadias. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data about 212 cases of hypospadias treated by urethroplasty from January 2008 to October 2016, 94 with the modified Snodgrass technique, namely with a silk line in addition to the urethral suture to make easier postoperative removal of the suture (group A), and the other 118 with the conventional Snodgrass technique (group B). The urethral suture was removed at 10 days after surgery for the patients in group A. We compared the success rate of surgery and incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with group B, group A showed a significantly higher success rate of surgery (81.36% vs 91.49%, P <0.05) but lower incidence rates of postoperative incisional infection (12.71% vs 4.26%, P <0.05) and urinary fistula (16.10% vs 6.38%, P <0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of urethral stenosis between the two groups (2.54% vs 2.13%, P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS The modified Snodgrass technique can improve the success rate of surgery and reduce the incidence rates of incisional infection and urinary fistula, which deserves wide clinical application.
Child ; Humans ; Hypospadias ; surgery ; Incidence ; Infant ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; prevention & control ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Wound Infection ; epidemiology ; Suture Techniques ; Urethra ; surgery ; Urethral Stricture ; epidemiology ; Urinary Fistula ; prevention & control

PURPOSE: This study examined the efficacy of the postoperative prophylactic antibiotics used in orthognathic surgery. The prevalence of surgical site infections (SSIs) was determined according to the use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients were divided into 2 groups. Each patient intravenously received 1.0 g of a third-generation cephalosporin (Cefpiramide) 30 minutes before surgery. Among them, 28 patients in the control group received 1.0 g Cefpiramide twice daily until the third day after surgery. The postoperative wounds were examined regularly for the presence of infectious signs. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infections between patients who had received postoperative prophylactic antibiotic administration and those who had not (p = 0.639). CONCLUSION: Prolonged prophylactic antibiotic use after orthognathic surgery may not be necessary, provided that there are no other significant factors for wound infections.
Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*administration & dosage ; Cephalosporins/*administration & dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Injections, Intravenous ; Male ; Mandible/surgery ; Maxilla/surgery ; *Oral Surgical Procedures ; *Osteotomy, Le Fort ; Prevalence ; Prospective Studies ; Surgical Wound Infection/*drug therapy/epidemiology/*prevention & control ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between the pattern of prophylactic antibiotic use (PAU) and the surgical site infection (SSI) rate for major surgeries in Korea. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent cardiac, colon and gastric surgery, hysterectomies and hip/knee replacements at 20 hospitals, and inclusive of over 500 beds. We randomly sampled 60 cases per surgery type for patients discharged between September and November, 2006. A total fo 2,924 cases were included in our analysis. Cox's proportional hazard analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between the pattern of PAU and SSI rate. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who received their first prophylactic antibiotics (PA) 1 hour before incision was 65.5%, who received inappropriate PAs was 80.8%, and the proportion of patients whose PA was discontinued within 24 hours of surgery was 0.5%. The average duration of PAU after surgery was 9 days. The relative risk (RR) of SSI in patients who received their first PA more than 1 hour before incision was significantly higher than for those who received it within 1 hour prior to incision (RR=8.20, 95% CI=4.81-13.99). Inappropriate PA selection increased SSI rate, albeit with marginal significance (RR=1.97, 95% CI=0.96-4.03). Also, prolonged PAU following surgery had no effect on SSI rate. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the pattern of PAU in the surgeries examined was not appropriate. Errors in the timing of PAU and of PA selection increase SSI rate. SSI rate remained unaltered following prolonged PAU after surgery.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; *Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods ; Female ; Humans ; Korea/epidemiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Care ; Preoperative Care ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Surgical Wound Infection/*epidemiology/prevention & control

Penile prosthesis implantation is the gold standard of surgical therapy for patients with medication-refractory erectile dysfunction. However, this umbrella definition includes significant heterogeneity and associated risk profiles that should be candidly discussed and addressed perioperatively. Factors associated with operative success and patient satisfaction are often surgery specific; however, risk profiling via patient selection, preoperative optimization, proper device selection, and intraoperative consideration are highly correlated. Some examples of common risk profiles include comorbidity(ies) such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, prior abdominal surgery, Peyronie's disease, and psychological risk factors. Similarly, integration of surgeon- and patient-amenable characteristics is key to decreasing risk of infection, complication, and need for revision. Finally, patient risk profiling provides a unique context for proper device selection and evidence-based intraoperative considerations.
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology* ; Comorbidity ; Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology* ; Erectile Dysfunction/surgery* ; Humans ; Male ; Mental Disorders/epidemiology* ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patient Selection ; Penile Implantation/methods* ; Penile Induration/epidemiology* ; Penile Prosthesis ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control* ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control* ; Reoperation ; Risk Assessment ; Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control*