Enterostomy-related complications are common in abdominal surgery. The incidence enterostomy-related complications varies according to the type and location of stoma, surgical procedure, and patient characteristics. Currently, there are no uniform criteria wopldwide for the classification of enterostomy complications. Previous classification of enterostomy-related complications were based on time of occurrence, clinical manifestations, or anatomical changes, etc., lacking uniformity and reproducibility. The concept and diagnostic criteria of complications are not yet clearly defined; and it is difficult to accurately determine the relationship between their severity, intervention, and medical cost. Moreover, surgeons and enterostomal therapists differ significantly in their concerns, cognition, and management principles for stoma-related complications. Therefore,the Chinese Ostomy Collaboration Group (COCG), together with the Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing Committee of Chinese Nursing Association, the Colon and Rectal Surgeon Committee of Surgeon Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, the Committee of Colorectal Cancer of Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, and the Colorectal Surgery Group of Surgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, jointly drafted the criteria for the classification and grading of enterostomy complications. We hope this criteria will facilitate prospective data collection, clinical diagnosis, treatment, medical training and education.
Humans ; Reproducibility of Results ; Enterostomy/adverse effects* ; Surgical Stomas ; Rectum ; Colon

The related technology of enterostomy is a professional skill that colorectal surgeons need to master, and it is clinically important to prevent the occurrence of enterostomy-related complications of low rectal cancer. The early complications of enterostomy include stoma retraction, stoma ischemic necrosis, stoma edema and peripheral dermatitis, and the long-term complications include parastomal hernia, stenosis and stoma prolapse. In addition, the rare or easily neglected stoma cancer, difficulty of stoma closure and following social psychological disorders should also be paid attention to by surgeons. Effective reduction of enterostomy complications can lead to better quality of life for patients, which is the best interpretation of the concept of "patient-centered ness" by colorectal surgeons.
Humans ; Quality of Life ; Surgical Stomas/adverse effects* ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Enterostomy/adverse effects* ; Constriction, Pathologic/etiology*

OBJECTIVETo evaluate wound healing after pancreaticojejunostomy of three anastomotic methods.

METHODSFifty-four domestic piglets were divided into three groups according to the types of anastomoses: group of end-to-end pancreaticojejunal invagination (EE group), group of binding pancreaticojejunostomy (BP group) and group of inkwell pancreaticojejunostomy (IP group). Bursting pressure, breaking strength and histopathological findings of anastomosis were assessed on operative day and on the 5th and 10th day after operation.

RESULTSBursting pressure was (67+/-8) mm Hg, (96+/-11) mm Hg and (131+/-9) mm Hg in EE group on day 0, 5 and 10; and (140+/-8) mm Hg, (179+/-10) mm Hg and (269+/-13) mm Hg in BP group; and (102+/-10) mm Hg, (171+/-18) mm Hg and (254+/-24) mm Hg in IP group. Compare to EE group, bursting pressure of BP group and IP group were all increased with significant differences (P<0.05). Another significant difference was observed between BP group and IP group after anastomoses on operative day. Breaking strength was (4.6+/-0.6) N, (5.8+/-0.5) N and (7.1+/-0.6) N in EE group on 0 d, 5 d and 10 d; and (4.5+/-0.4) N, (6.6+/-0.4) N and (10.0+/-0.6) N in BP group; and (4.6+/-0.3) N, (6.5+/-0.4) N and (9.1+/-0.9) N in IP group. A similar value of anastomoses was shown in BP group and IP group on day 0, day 5 and day 10, but significant increase was demonstrated compared to EE group on day 5 and 10. Anastomotic site was well repaired by connective tissue and the cut surface of pancreatic stump was covered by mucosal epithelium in BP group and IP group on day 10, but the cut surface was incompletely repaired by granulation tissue and no regeneration of the epithelium was found in EE group.

CONCLUSIONSWound healing of binding pancreaticojejunostomy and inkwell pancreaticojejunostomy is more rapid and better than end-to-end pancreaticojejunal invagination, but breaking strength of inkwell pancreaticojejunostomy is weaker than binding pancreaticojejunostomy.

Anastomosis, Surgical ; methods ; Animals ; Female ; Male ; Pancreaticojejunostomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Surgical Stomas ; pathology ; Swine ; Wound Healing

Parastomal hernia is a common complication after abdominal ostomy. Although the European Hernia Society guidelines recommend surgical treatment for parastomal hernia, there is still no "gold standard" procedure. The exploration and practice of parastomal hernia repair surgery has been carried out for many years, from the earlier hernia ring suture and stoma relocation repair, to the reinforcement of meshes (such as the Keyhole repair technique and the Sugarbaker repair technique) and the application of laparoscopic technique, and then to the combination of various methods. The intervention of single-port laparoscopic technique and robot-assisted surgery, the prevention of parastomal hernia, the specialization of treatment, multidisciplinary cooperation, and the improvement of diagnostic methods will all provide more optimal solutions for stoma patients. This article will review and summarize the development process and evaluation of parastomal hernia surgical techniques.
Humans ; Herniorrhaphy/methods* ; Surgical Mesh ; Incisional Hernia/surgery* ; Surgical Stomas/adverse effects* ; Laparoscopy/methods*

Objective: To explore the value of a two-stitch continuous suture in single- lumen ileostomy. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Data for 98 patients who underwent single-lumen enterostomy were retrospectively collected between 1 January 2021 and 1 May 2022 at Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University. All patients met the indications for prophylactic single-lumen ileostomy. Those older than 80 years of age, with complex underlying diseases, extremely poor systemic conditions who could not tolerate surgery, poor blood supply at the end of the bowel, and severe edema or severe infection at the end of the bowel were excluded. Among the included patients, patients who underwent surgery before 1 October 2021 underwent ileostomy with interrupted suture (control group, n=60), and patients operated on and after 1 October 2021 routinely underwent two-stitch continuous suture ileostomy (two-stitch stoma group, n=38). Two-stitch continuous suture ileostomy is performed as follows: the first continuous suture is used to suture the intestinal seromuscular layer, peritoneum, posterior sheath, and anterior sheath from deep to superficial layers. The bowel wall is then opened. The second continuous suture is used to suture the full thickness of the bowel and the skin. The differences in postoperative ostomy-related complications and operation time were compared between the groups. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline data between the groups (all, P>0.05). The operative time in the two-stitch stoma group was shorter than that of the control group (16.6±2.2 minutes vs. 25.1±2.4 minutes, respectively; t=-17.874;P<0.001). The incidences of mucocutaneous separation, dermatitis, and stoma rebound in the two-stitch stoma group were lower than those of the control group [5.3% (2/38) vs. 31.7% (19/60), χ²=9.633, P=0.002;5.3% (2/38) vs. 28.3% (17/60), χ²=7.923, P=0.005; and 2.6% (1/38) vs. 18.3% (11/60), P=0.026, respectively], while the incidences of parastomal hernia and stoma prolapse, and the postoperative visual analog scale scores in the two groups were similar (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with traditional single-lumen ileostomy, two-stitch continuous suture ileostomy has the advantages of short operation time, simplicity, esthetic appearance of the stoma, and a significant reduction in the postoperative complications associated with ileostomy.
Humans ; Ileostomy/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies ; Suture Techniques/adverse effects* ; Surgical Stomas ; Sutures/adverse effects* ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology*

The rate of sphincter-preserving surgery for mid-low rectal cancer is increasing, but anastomotic leakage remains to be one of the common serious complications after operation. How to reduce the morbility and mortality of anastomotic leakage is always a hot and difficult point in colorectal surgery. Protective ostomy is a common method to deal with the above problems in clinical practice. However, some problems such as inappropriate stoma and stoma-related complications etc. become the current clinical challenges. The purpose of this consensus focusing on indication of ostomy, clinical value, ostomy skills, prevention of stoma complications, reversion of stoma and stoma nursing aims to provide guidance for the clinical practice of protective ostomy in the operation of mid-low rectal cancer in China.
Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects* ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology* ; Consensus ; Humans ; Ostomy/adverse effects* ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Risk Factors ; Surgical Stomas

No consensus on standardized technique of enterostomy creation has been made meanwhile high heterogeneity of surgical procedure exists in 'stoma creation' chapters of textbooks or atlases of colorectal surgery. The present article reviews the anatomy of tendinous aponeurotic fibers which is crucial for abdominal wall tension and integrity. Through empirical practice we hypothesize a procedure of enterostomy creation basied on abdominal wall tension plus anchor suture for fascia fixation which could theoretically decrease short-term stoma complication rates and long-term parastomal hernia rates. Surgical techniques are as followed: (1) preoperative stoma site mark for de-functioning ileostomy should be positioned at the lateral border of rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) to decrease the difficulty of stoma reversal and for permanent colostomy should be placed overlying the RAM to promote adhesion; (2)Optimal circular removal or lineal opening of skin, and avoid dissection of subcutaneous tissue; (3) Lineal dissection of natural strong fascia (rectus sheath) at stoma site and blunt separation of muscular fibers. The tunnel of the fascia should be made with appropriate size without undue tension. To prevent the formation of dead space, additional suturing at fascia layer is unnecessary. (4) Anchor suture for fascia fixation at two ends of fascia opening could be considered to avoid delayed fascia disruption and parastomal hernia. (5) After pull-through of ileum or colon loop, 4-8 interrupted seromuscular sutures could be placed to attach loop to skin. For ileostomy, self-eversion of mucosa can be successful in vast majority of cases and a Brooke ileostomy is not necessary. The efficacy and safety of this procedure should be tested in future trials.
Humans ; Abdominal Wall/surgery* ; Surgical Stomas/adverse effects* ; Enterostomy ; Incisional Hernia ; Fascia

The incidence of parastomal hernia is substantially high, significantly affecting the quality of life of patients with stoma. How to effectively solve the problem of parastomal hernia is a long-term focus of hernia and abdominal wall surgery and colorectal surgery. The European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernia published in 2018 has recommended the use of a prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia for the first time. In the following 5 years, more randomized controlled trials of multi-center, large-sample, double-blind, long-term follow-up have been published, and no significant effect of mesh prophylaxis has been observed on the incidence of parastomal hernia. However, whether mesh could decrease surgical intervention by limiting the symptoms of parastomal hernias would become a potential value of prophylaxis, which requires further research to elucidate.
Humans ; Hernia, Ventral/surgery* ; Surgical Mesh/adverse effects* ; Quality of Life ; Incisional Hernia/prevention & control* ; Surgical Stomas/adverse effects* ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Colostomy/adverse effects* ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Defunctioning stoma is an effective method to reduce symptomatic anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. It is of concern that about 1 in 5 defunctioning stomas will not be restored, that is, becoming permanent. And that is usually beyond expectation by physicians and patients, which deserves enough attention. The causes are complex, including anastomotic complications, tumor progression, perioperative death, poor anal function and patient willingness. Possible risk factors include symptomatic anastomotic leakage, age, tumor location, neoadjuvant therapy, anal function, TNM stage, ASA score, hospital factors, etc. Those factors may occur in various stages of patient referral such as before neoadjuvant therapy, prior to surgery, intra or post-operative period, and follow-up. Adequate physician-patient communication and shared decision-making, comprehensive tumor and patient function assessment, rational treatment strategy, careful manipulation during operation and good quality control, and meticulous perioperative management are important steps to reduce the permanent stoma. When shared decision-making, patients' needs should be fully considered while unnecessary expectations of anal preservation should be avoided. The risk of perpetuation of defunctioning stoma should be fully informed. Safe operation, especially anastomosis, is the key to avoid permanent stoma. And attention should be paid to the early detection and intervention of postoperative anastomotic stenosis.
Humans ; Anastomotic Leak/etiology* ; Surgical Stomas/adverse effects* ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Rectum/surgery* ; Risk Factors ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*

Prevention of intraoperative incidental injuries during radical operation for rectal cancer and management of postoperative complication are associated with successful operation and prognosis of patients. This paper discusses how to prevent such intraoperative incidental injuries and how to manage postoperative complication. (1) Accurate clinical evaluation should be performed before operation and reasonable treatment decision should be made, including determination of the distance from transection to lower margin of the tumor, T and M staging evaluated by MRI, fascia invasion of mesorectum, metastasis of lateral lymph nodes, metastatic station of mesentery lymph node, association between levator ani muscle and anal sphincter, course and length of sigmoid observed by Barium enema, length assessment of pull-through bowel. Meanwhile individual factors of patients and tumors must be realized accurately. (2) Injury of pelvic visceral fascia should be avoided during operation. Negative low and circumference cutting edge must be ensured. Blood supply and adequate length of pull-down bowel must be also ensured. Urinary system injury, pelvic bleeding and intestinal damage should be avoided. Team cooperation and anesthesia procedure should be emphasized. Capacity of handling accident events should be cultivated for the team. (3) intraoperative incidental injuries during operation by instruments should be avoided, such as poor clarity of camera due to spray and smog, ineffective instruments resulted from repeated usage. (4) As to the prevention and management of postoperative complication of rectal cancer operation, prophylactic stoma should be regularly performed for rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection, while drainage tube placement does not decrease the morbidities of anastomosis and other complications. After sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, attentions must be paid to the occurrence of anastomotic bleeding, pelvic bleeding, anastomotic fistula, ileus, intestinal necrosis and anastomotic stenosis. After sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, if small amount of bleeding happens, titanium clamp or electric coagulation can be used; if delayed pelvic bleeding occurs obviously, embolism should be applied. Conservative treatment may be used for the non-carcinomatous ileus. When small anastomotic stenosis is found, local treatment is available (finger dilation, balloon expansion, transanal radiated cutting or resection), and for severe stenosis, transadominal operation is required.
Anal Canal ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Iatrogenic Disease ; prevention & control ; Organ Sparing Treatments ; Postoperative Complications ; Prognosis ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Surgical Stomas