This article analyses the chemical test results of several common repair mesh, and concludes the currently several common repair mesh are safe and reliable.
Prostheses and Implants ; Surgical Mesh ; standards

The aim of the surgical reconstruction of medial orbital wall fracture is to restore the three-dimensional shape and size of the orbital cavity. Many different autologous and alloplastic implants have been used for the reconstruction of medial orbital wall fracture. Recently, titanium mesh has been reported of its advantage over other various implants. As the advantage of the Titanium Mesh Screen(R) in orbital reconstruction was reported in our previous report1, this study is focused on the comparison of the two different types of titanium mesh screen through our experiences. From March 1998 to February 2003, 18 cases of medial orbital wall fracture were surgically repaired. Nine cases were repaired with Titanium Micro Mesh(R)(Stryker Leibinger, USA) and 9 cases with Titanium Mesh screen 1.3(R)(Marthys, USA). Through our experiences, shaping of the Titanium Micro Mesh(R) was as easy as Titanium Mesh Screen 1.3(R). the Titanium Micro Mesh(R) has some advantages over Titanium Mesh Screen 1.3(R); (1) Titanium Micro Mesh(R) was more easily inserted than the Titanium Mesh Screen 1.3(R). (2) The insertion failure by crumbling was less frequent in Titanium Micro Mesh(R) than in Titanium Mesh Screen 1.3(R). (3) Fixation of Titanium Micro Mesh(R) was more secure than that of Titanium Mesh Screen(R). So we are reporting the superiority of the Titanium Micro Mesh(R) to Titanium Mesh Screen 1.3(R) in the reconstruction of medial orbital wall fracture.
Orbit* ; Orbital Fractures ; Surgical Mesh ; Titanium*

OBJECTIVETo evaluate a knitted polypropylene mesh used for mammapexy in correcting the breast ptosis.

METHODSTwenty-one patients with the mild or moderate breast ptosis were undergoing the mammapexy with a knitted polypropylene mesh. The operation was performed through the periareolar incision and a monofilament knitted polypropylene mesh was subcutaneously implanted on the surface of the gland and fixed upward.

RESULTSAll of the patients were satisfactory of the appearance with the follow-ups from 2 to 16 months. No secondary ptosis, hypertrophic scars and foreign body reactions were found.

CONCLUSIONThe above-mentioned technique could be a good, safe and reliable method for correcting breast ptosis.

Direct suture repair with mesh reinforcement is the main surgical procedure in ventral hernia repair. The best place for mesh implantation is retromuscular space which means sublay. The most commonly used techniques are open sublay and laparoscopic IPOM repair. But open sublay repair may cause more trauma to the abdominal wall and result in more infections. Laparoscopic IPOM repair carries an increased risk in bowel injury, mesh-related complications and postoperative pain. Germany surgeon Reinpold developed a new technique defined as "MILOS concept" by combining the advantages of open sublay and laparoscopic IPOM repair. This technique uses mini or less incision hybrid with endoscopic technique to accomplish minimally invasive sublay repair. The MILOS operation has the advantages of less operative trauma, fewer postoperative complications, low recurrence rate and high economic efficiency. "MILOS concept" has been applied with several modifications by using endoscopic technique (EMILOS and eTEP) or robotic surgery. This new minimal invasive ventral hernia repair technique is accepted and applied in clinical practice by most surgeons worldwide. Several literatures already reported that this procedure had very good surgical outcomes, and confirmed its value in further popularization.
Hernia, Ventral ; surgery ; Herniorrhaphy ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Postoperative Complications ; Surgical Mesh

Inguinal hernia is a defect disease in the abdominal wall. Surgeons have tried various ways to repair the defect for more than 100 years. The traditional herniorrhaphy destroys the normal anatomical structure, and the recurrence rate is quite high. After that, surgeons began to repair the defects with prostheses, from the initial use of rough metal materials such as silver, tantalum, stainless steel, to nylon, fiberglass, silicone rubber and other non-metallic materials, and also from artificial synthetic polymer non-absorbable materials such as polypropylene, polyester, ePTFE, to synthetic absorbable materials such as polyglycolic acid and the acellular extracellular matrix derived from biological meshes. However, these prostheses still can not meet the diverse needs of patients. Thus, multifunctional composite prostheses consisting of two or more materials were born, and various types of composite prostheses, stem cell coating meshes, 3D meshes, microstructure meshes were developed. The repair method evolved from traditional hernia repair to tension-free hernia repair and laparoscopic hernia repair. Surgeons are dedicated to finding idealized meshes for the perfect repair of defects, while considering postoperative complications, patient's quality of life, long-term efficacy and other issues. In the face of a wide variety of repair materials, the choice of surgeons is blind, and there is no standard to determine which prostheses are suitable for patients. Therefore, we have combed the development of different types of prostheses, summarized the development process of hernia repair materials for the past 100 years, and put forward the prospects for future development of prostheses, in order to provide reference for the selection of prostheses.
Hernia ; Herniorrhaphy ; Humans ; Materials Science ; Quality of Life ; Surgical Mesh

Hernia, Ventral ; surgery ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Surgical Mesh

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the surgical strategy for laparoscopic approach in recurrent inguinal hernia repair.

METHODSBetween January 2001 and December 2011, the clinical data of 213 patients with 225 recurrent inguinal hernias underwent laparoscopic repair were retrospectively analyzed. There were 202 male and 11 female patients and their average age were (67 ± 14) years old (range 22-97 years old). The surgical methods included laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP, n = 174), total extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy (TEP, n = 41) and intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM, n = 10). The follow-up period ranged from 15 to 60 months (median 42 months). No patient lost to follow-up during the investigation.

RESULTSThe 48 TAPP and 26 TEP were applied to 77 (32.9%) recurrent hernias after conventional suture repair; 23 TAPP and 15 TEP were utilized to 38 (16.9%) recurrent hernias after Lichtenstein repair; 90 TAPP and 1 IPOM were employed for 91 (40.4%) recurrent hernias after Patch and Plug repair; and the other 22 (9.8%) recurrent hernias after preperitoneal repair were repaired by using 13 TAPP and 9 IPOM techniques. No conversion to open surgery was observed. The average operative time was (39 ± 14) minutes (range 15-90 minutes). No patients required analgesia postoperatively. The postoperative average VAS score was 2.4 ± 1.1 (range 1.2-6.4). The average hospital stay was (1.7 ± 1.5) days (range 1-9 days), and the patients returned to unrestricted activities in 2 weeks was 99.6% (212 cases). No recurrence was observed during the follow-up. The accumulative postoperative complications rates was 11.1% (25 cases), with 1 severe complication (surgical intervention was needed) as intraabdominal infection (0.4%), as well as other 24 complications including 15 cases of seroma (6.7%), 5 cases of urinary retention (2.2%), 3 cases with transient paresthesia (1.3%) and 1 case with paralytic ileus (0.4%).

CONCLUSIONSTAPP and TEP are both feasible and efficacious techniques to treat recurrent hernias after suture repair and Lichtenstein repair, while the choice depends on surgeons' experience. Most recurrent hernias after Patch and Plug repair could be treated successfully by TAPP but TEP technique is not encouraged. For recurrences after preperitoneal repair, the TAPP repair should be recommended as first choice, while IPOM is a good technique to cope with the cases which TAPP failed.

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) uses resorbable and non-resorbable membranes as biological barriers. This study compared the differences in hard tissue stability between GBR using evidence-based digital titanium mesh and resorbable collagen membranes during implant placement. A total of 40 patients (65 implant sites) were enrolled and divided into two groups: resorbable membrane and digital titanium mesh groups. The alveolar bone was analyzed at two- and three-dimensional levels using cone-beam computed tomography and by reconstructing and superimposing the hard tissues at four time points: preoperatively, postoperatively, before second-stage surgery, and 1 year after loading. The use of digital titanium mesh showed less alveolar bone resorption in vertical and horizontal directions two-dimensionally before the second-stage surgery and 1 year after loading. Regarding volumetric stability, the percentage of resorption after 6 months of healing with resorbable membrane coverage reached 37.5%. However, it was only 23.4% with titanium mesh. Although postoperative bone volume was greater at all labial sites with resorbable membrane than with digital titanium mesh, after substantial bone resorption within 1 year of loading, the labial bone thickness at the upper part of implants was thinner with resorbable membrane than with digital titanium mesh. Furthermore, digital titanium meshes made according to ideal bone arch contour reduced soft tissue irritation, and the exposure rate was only 10%. Therefore, although both resorbable membrane and digital titanium mesh in GBR were able to successfully reconstruct the bone defect, digital titanium meshes were better at maintaining the hard tissue volume in the osteogenic space.
Bone Regeneration ; Bone Resorption ; Humans ; Osteogenesis ; Surgical Mesh ; Titanium

Titanium micro-mesh implants are widely used in orbital wall reconstructions because they have several advantageous characteristics. However, the rough and irregular marginal spurs of the cut edges of the titanium mesh sheet impede the efficacious and minimally traumatic insertion of the implant, because these spurs may catch or hook the orbital soft tissue, skin, or conjunctiva during the insertion procedure. In order to prevent this problem, we developed an easy method of inserting a titanium micro-mesh, in which it is wrapped with the aseptic transparent plastic film that is used to pack surgical instruments or is attached to one side of the inner suture package. Fifty-four patients underwent orbital wall reconstruction using a transconjunctival or transcutaneous approach. The wrapped implant was easily inserted without catching or injuring the orbital soft tissue, skin, or conjunctiva. In most cases, the implant was inserted in one attempt. Postoperative computed tomographic scans showed excellent placement of the titanium micro-mesh and adequate anatomic reconstruction of the orbital walls. This wrapping insertion method may be useful for making the insertion of titanium micro-mesh implants in the reconstruction of orbital wall fractures easier and less traumatic.
Conjunctiva ; Humans ; Orbit ; Orbital Fractures ; Plastics ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Skin ; Surgical Instruments ; Surgical Mesh ; Sutures ; Titanium*

European Hernia Society issued a guideline for the prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias in 2017, which is the first international guideline for the parastomal hernia. This guideline proposed 12 problems about incidence, diagnosis and treatment, and discussed these problems in depth. The main contents of this guideline are summarized as follows: (1) End colostomy is associated with a higher incidence of parastomal hernia compared to other types of stomas. (2) Clinical examination is necessary for the diagnosis of parastomal hernia, whereas computed tomography scan or ultrasonography may be performed in cases of diagnostic uncertainty. (3) The use of the European Hernia Society classification for uniform research reporting is recommended. (4) There is insufficient evidence on the policy in watchful waiting. (5) There is insufficient evidence on the route and location of stoma construction, and the size of the aperture. (6) The use of a prophylactic synthetic non-absorbable mesh upon construction of an end colostomy is strongly recommended. No such recommendation can be made for other types of stomas at present.(7) It is strongly recommended to avoid performing a suture repair for elective parastomal hernia. (8) So far, there is no sufficient comparative evidence on specific techniques, open or laparoscopic surgery and specific mesh types. However, most data in this guideline were retrospective without high level evidence. A lot of questions remain controversial and more high-level evidence are expected to solve these problems.
Colostomy ; Hernia, Ventral ; prevention & control ; surgery ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Mesh ; Surgical Stomas