1.The Superior Colliculus: Cell Types, Connectivity, and Behavior.
Xue LIU ; Hongren HUANG ; Terrance P SNUTCH ; Peng CAO ; Liping WANG ; Feng WANG
Neuroscience Bulletin 2022;38(12):1519-1540
The superior colliculus (SC), one of the most well-characterized midbrain sensorimotor structures where visual, auditory, and somatosensory information are integrated to initiate motor commands, is highly conserved across vertebrate evolution. Moreover, cell-type-specific SC neurons integrate afferent signals within local networks to generate defined output related to innate and cognitive behaviors. This review focuses on the recent progress in understanding of phenotypic diversity amongst SC neurons and their intrinsic circuits and long-projection targets. We further describe relevant neural circuits and specific cell types in relation to behavioral outputs and cognitive functions. The systematic delineation of SC organization, cell types, and neural connections is further put into context across species as these depend upon laminar architecture. Moreover, we focus on SC neural circuitry involving saccadic eye movement, and cognitive and innate behaviors. Overall, the review provides insight into SC functioning and represents a basis for further understanding of the pathology associated with SC dysfunction.
Superior Colliculi/physiology*
;
Saccades
;
Neurons/physiology*
2.Formation of the Looming-evoked Innate Defensive Response during Postnatal Development in Mice.
Shanping CHEN ; Huiying TAN ; Zhijie WANG ; Yu-Ting TSENG ; Xiaotao LI ; Liping WANG
Neuroscience Bulletin 2022;38(7):741-752
Environmental threats often trigger innate defensive responses in mammals. However, the gradual development of functional properties of these responses during the postnatal development stage remains unclear. Here, we report that looming stimulation in mice evoked flight behavior commencing at P14-16 and had fully developed by P20-24. The visual-evoked innate defensive response was not significantly altered by sensory deprivation at an early postnatal stage. Furthermore, the percentages of wide-field and horizontal cells in the superior colliculus were notably elevated at P20-24. Our findings define a developmental time window for the formation of the visual innate defense response during the early postnatal period and provide important insight into the underlying mechanism.
Animals
;
Evoked Potentials, Visual
;
Fear/physiology*
;
Mammals
;
Mice
;
Mice, Inbred C57BL
;
Neurons/physiology*
;
Superior Colliculi/physiology*
3.An intracellular study of pretectal influence on the optic tectum of the frog, Rana catesbeiana.
Neuroscience Bulletin 2007;23(2):113-118
OBJECTIVEA few investigations have been reported about pretectal suppressive influences on the optic tectum of frog, but characteristics of tectal activity to pretectal input are left unknown. We made intracellular recordings to demonstrate the unexpected complexity in synaptic mechanisms involved in the suppressive influences of pretecal stimulation on the tectal cells.
METHODSIn the present study, we investigated the neuronal activity evoked by pretectal (Lpd/P) nuclei stimulation using intracellular recording technique.
RESULTSThe pretectal stimulation mainly elicited two types of responses in the ipsilateral tectum: an excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) followed by an inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP) and a pure IPSP. The latter predominated in the tectal cells responding to pretectal stimulation. In a few cells, biphasic hyperpolarization appeared under stronger stimulus intensities. The spikes of tecto-pretectal projecting cells elicited by antidromical stimulation were recorded in the ipsilateral tectum, which revealed reciprocal connections between the tectum and particular pretectal nuclei. The synaptic natures underlying pretecto-tectal information transformation have also been demonstrated. EPSPs with short latencies were concluded to be monosynaptic. Most IPSPs were generated through polysynaptic paths, but monosynaptic IPSPs were also recorded in the tectum. Nearly 98% of impaled tectal cells (except for antidromically projecting cells) showed inhibitory responses to pretectal stimulation.
CONCLUSIONThe results provide strong evidence that pretectal cells broadly inhibit tectal neurons as that has suggested by behavioral and extracellular recording studies.
Animals ; Electric Stimulation ; Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials ; physiology ; Female ; Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials ; physiology ; Male ; Neural Inhibition ; physiology ; Neural Pathways ; cytology ; physiology ; Neurons ; physiology ; Rana catesbeiana ; physiology ; Superior Colliculi ; cytology ; physiology