Purpose: Laparoscopic surgery is a choice in several emergency settings. However, there has been no nationwide study or survey that has compared the clinical use of laparoscopic emergency surgery (LES) versus open abdominal emergency surgery (OES) in Korea.Therefore, we examined the state of LES across multiple centers in Korea and further compared this data with the global state based on published reports. Methods: Data of 2,122 patients who received abdominal emergency surgery between 2014 and 2019 in three hospitals in Korea were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Several clinical factors were investigated and analyzed. Results: Of the patients, 1,280 (60.3%) were in the OES group and 842 (39.7%) were in the LES group. The most commonly operated organ in OES was the small bowel (25.8%), whereas that for LES was the appendix. In appendectomy and cholecystectomy, 93.7% and 88.0% were in the LES group. In small bowel surgery, gastric surgery, and large bowel surgery, 89.4%, 92.0%, and 79.1% were in the OES group. The severity-related factors of patient status demonstrated statistically significant limiting factors of selection between LES and OES. Conclusion Although our study has several limitations, compared to the LES data from other countries, the general LES state was similar in appendectomies, cholecystectomies, and small bowel surgeries. However, in gastric and colorectal surgeries, the LES state was different from those of other countries. This study demonstrated the LES state and limiting factors of selection between LES and OES in various operated organs. Further studies are required to analyze these differences and the various limiting factors.

Purpose: Over the past 3 years, approximately 23,000 emergency surgeries were performed annually in South Korea, accounting for >1% of all surgeries nationwide. With the growing necessity for treating these emergency cases with dedication and proficiency, acute care surgery (ACS) teams were appointed at various hospitals. Regarding the implications of the ACS team, many studies showed promising results with a shorter time from the emergency department (ED) to the operating room (OR), shorter length of stay, and fewer complications. This study aimed to demonstrate the overall effect of ACS implementation at a single institution in South Korea. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective observational study. Patients aged >18 years who visited the emergency room and received emergency surgery between July 2014 and December 2016 (pre-ACS) and between July 2017 and December 2019 (post-ACS) were included. Results: Among 958 patients, 497 were in the pre-ACS group and 461 in the post-ACS group. After propensity score matching by age, sex, underlying disease, and Emergency Surgery Acuity Score, 405 patients remained in each group. Our analysis showed a reduction in time from ED presentation to operation (547.8 ± 401.0 minutes vs. 476.6 ± 313.2 minutes, P = 0.005) and complication rates (24.7% vs. 16.8%, P < 0.001) in the post-ACS group. There were no significant differences in total operation duration, length of hospital stay, and mortality between the groups. Conclusion As expected, time from ED to OR and complication rates were significantly reduced in the post-ACS group.Implementing an ACS team dedicated to emergency surgery provides better clinical outcomes.

Purpose: Over the past 3 years, approximately 23,000 emergency surgeries were performed annually in South Korea, accounting for >1% of all surgeries nationwide. With the growing necessity for treating these emergency cases with dedication and proficiency, acute care surgery (ACS) teams were appointed at various hospitals. Regarding the implications of the ACS team, many studies showed promising results with a shorter time from the emergency department (ED) to the operating room (OR), shorter length of stay, and fewer complications. This study aimed to demonstrate the overall effect of ACS implementation at a single institution in South Korea. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective observational study. Patients aged >18 years who visited the emergency room and received emergency surgery between July 2014 and December 2016 (pre-ACS) and between July 2017 and December 2019 (post-ACS) were included. Results: Among 958 patients, 497 were in the pre-ACS group and 461 in the post-ACS group. After propensity score matching by age, sex, underlying disease, and Emergency Surgery Acuity Score, 405 patients remained in each group. Our analysis showed a reduction in time from ED presentation to operation (547.8 ± 401.0 minutes vs. 476.6 ± 313.2 minutes, P = 0.005) and complication rates (24.7% vs. 16.8%, P < 0.001) in the post-ACS group. There were no significant differences in total operation duration, length of hospital stay, and mortality between the groups. Conclusion As expected, time from ED to OR and complication rates were significantly reduced in the post-ACS group.Implementing an ACS team dedicated to emergency surgery provides better clinical outcomes.

Purpose: Over the past 3 years, approximately 23,000 emergency surgeries were performed annually in South Korea, accounting for >1% of all surgeries nationwide. With the growing necessity for treating these emergency cases with dedication and proficiency, acute care surgery (ACS) teams were appointed at various hospitals. Regarding the implications of the ACS team, many studies showed promising results with a shorter time from the emergency department (ED) to the operating room (OR), shorter length of stay, and fewer complications. This study aimed to demonstrate the overall effect of ACS implementation at a single institution in South Korea. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective observational study. Patients aged >18 years who visited the emergency room and received emergency surgery between July 2014 and December 2016 (pre-ACS) and between July 2017 and December 2019 (post-ACS) were included. Results: Among 958 patients, 497 were in the pre-ACS group and 461 in the post-ACS group. After propensity score matching by age, sex, underlying disease, and Emergency Surgery Acuity Score, 405 patients remained in each group. Our analysis showed a reduction in time from ED presentation to operation (547.8 ± 401.0 minutes vs. 476.6 ± 313.2 minutes, P = 0.005) and complication rates (24.7% vs. 16.8%, P < 0.001) in the post-ACS group. There were no significant differences in total operation duration, length of hospital stay, and mortality between the groups. Conclusion As expected, time from ED to OR and complication rates were significantly reduced in the post-ACS group.Implementing an ACS team dedicated to emergency surgery provides better clinical outcomes.