1.Efficacy and Safety of the Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Based Approach for Patients with Acute Chest Pain at an Emergency Department: One Month Clinical Follow-up Study.
Joonghee KIM ; Hwijae LEE ; Sungwook SONG ; Jinsik PARK ; Hwanjun JAE ; Whal LEE ; Sangdo SHIN ; Sungkoo JUNG ; Youngho KWAK ; Giljoon SUH ; Jaehyung PARK
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2010;25(3):466-471
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for evaluation of acute chest pain in real world population, we prospectively enrolled 296 patients with acute chest pain at emergency department (ED) from November 2005 to February 2007. The patients were grouped based on the clinical information and CTCA result. The patients with a low risk profile and no significant coronary stenosis (>50%) in CTCA were discharged immediately (Group 1, n=103). On the other hand, the patients with an intermediate risk profile without significant stenosis were observed in ED for 24 hr (Group 2, n=104). The patients with significant stenosis underwent further coronary evaluation and management accordingly (Group 3, n=89). While no false negative case was found in Group 1, seven cases (6.73%) were found in Group 2, mostly during the observation period. In Group 3, there were 54 (60.67%) cases of acute coronary syndrome including 10 myocardial infarctions. The overall accuracy of CTCA for acute coronary syndrome was 88.5% (sensitivity), 85.1% (specificity), 60.7% (positive predictive value) and 96.6% (negative predictive value). In conclusion, clinical decision based on CTCA is safe and effective for low risk patients. Further validation is needed in patients with intermediate risk profile.
Adult
;
Aged
;
*Chest Pain/diagnosis/etiology/radiography
;
Coronary Angiography/*methods
;
Coronary Stenosis/radiography
;
Decision Making
;
Emergency Service, Hospital
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Prospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods
2.Is higher dose always the right answer in stereotactic body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma?
Kyung Hwa LEE ; Jeong Il YU ; Hee Chul PARK ; Su Yeon PARK ; Jung Suk SHIN ; Eun Hyuk SHIN ; Sungkoo CHO ; Sang Hoon JUNG ; Young Yih HAN ; Do Hoon LIM
Radiation Oncology Journal 2018;36(2):129-138
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicities after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with two different dose regimens for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) ≤3 cm in size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients with liver-confined HCC treated between 2009 and 2014 with SBRT. Total doses of 45 Gy (n = 10) or 60 Gy (n = 34) in 3 fractions were prescribed to the 95% isodose line covering 95% of the planning target volume. Rates of local control (LC), intrahepatic failure-free survival (IHFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29 months (range, 8 to 64 months). Rates at 1 and 3 years were 97.7% and 95.0% for LC, 97.7% and 80.7% for OS, 76% and 40.5% for IHFFS, and 87.3% and 79.5% for DMFS. Five patients (11.4%) experienced degradation of albumin-bilirubin grade, 2 (4.5%) degradation of Child-Pugh score, and 4 (9.1%) grade 3 or greater laboratory abnormalities within 3 months after SBRT. No significant difference was seen in any oncological outcomes or treatment-related toxicities between the two dose regimens. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT was highly effective for local control without severe toxicities in patients with HCC smaller than 3 cm. The regimen of a total dose of 45 Gy in 3 fractions was comparable to 60 Gy in efficacy and safety of SBRT for small HCC.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
;
Dose Fractionation
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Methods
;
Radiosurgery
;
Retrospective Studies
3.Initial clinical outcomes of proton beam radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma
Jeong Il YU ; Gyu Sang YOO ; Sungkoo CHO ; Sang Hoon JUNG ; Youngyih HAN ; Seyjoon PARK ; Boram LEE ; Wonseok KANG ; Dong Hyun SINN ; Yong Han PAIK ; Geum Youn GWAK ; Moon Seok CHOI ; Joon Hyeok LEE ; Kwang Cheol KOH ; Seung Woon PAIK ; Hee Chul PARK
Radiation Oncology Journal 2018;36(1):25-34
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the initial outcomes of proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in terms of tumor response and safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HCC patients who were not indicated for standard curative local modalities and who were treated with PBT at Samsung Medical Center from January 2016 to February 2017 were enrolled. Toxicity was scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Tumor response was evaluated using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). RESULTS: A total of 101 HCC patients treated with PBT were included. Patients were treated with an equivalent dose of 62–92 GyE10. Liver function status was not significantly affected after PBT. Greater than 80% of patients had Child-Pugh class A and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 1 up to 3-months after PBT. Of 78 patients followed for three months after PBT, infield complete and partial responses were achieved in 54 (69.2%) and 14 (17.9%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: PBT treatment of HCC patients showed a favorable infield complete response rate of 69.2% with acceptable acute toxicity. An additional follow-up study of these patients will be conducted.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Liver
;
Proton Therapy
;
Protons
;
Radiotherapy
;
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
4.The first private-hospital based proton therapy center in Korea; status of the Proton Therapy Center at Samsung Medical Center.
Kwangzoo CHUNG ; Youngyih HAN ; Jinsung KIM ; Sung Hwan AHN ; Sang Gyu JU ; Sang Hoon JUNG ; Yoonsun CHUNG ; Sungkoo CHO ; Kwanghyun JO ; Eun Hyuk SHIN ; Chae Seon HONG ; Jung Suk SHIN ; Seyjoon PARK ; Dae Hyun KIM ; Hye Young KIM ; Boram LEE ; Gantaro SHIBAGAKI ; Hideki NONAKA ; Kenzo SASAI ; Yukio KOYABU ; Changhoon CHOI ; Seung Jae HUH ; Yong Chan AHN ; Hong Ryull PYO ; Do Hoon LIM ; Hee Chul PARK ; Won PARK ; Dong Ryul OH ; Jae Myung NOH ; Jeong Il YU ; Sanghyuk SONG ; Ji Eun LEE ; Bomi LEE ; Doo Ho CHOI
Radiation Oncology Journal 2015;33(4):337-343
PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to describe the proton therapy system at Samsung Medical Center (SMC-PTS) including the proton beam generator, irradiation system, patient positioning system, patient position verification system, respiratory gating system, and operating and safety control system, and review the current status of the SMC-PTS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SMC-PTS has a cyclotron (230 MeV) and two treatment rooms: one treatment room is equipped with a multi-purpose nozzle and the other treatment room is equipped with a dedicated pencil beam scanning nozzle. The proton beam generator including the cyclotron and the energy selection system can lower the energy of protons down to 70 MeV from the maximum 230 MeV. RESULTS: The multi-purpose nozzle can deliver both wobbling proton beam and active scanning proton beam, and a multi-leaf collimator has been installed in the downstream of the nozzle. The dedicated scanning nozzle can deliver active scanning proton beam with a helium gas filled pipe minimizing unnecessary interactions with the air in the beam path. The equipment was provided by Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd., RayStation from RaySearch Laboratories AB is the selected treatment planning system, and data management will be handled by the MOSAIQ system from Elekta AB. CONCLUSION: The SMC-PTS located in Seoul, Korea, is scheduled to begin treating cancer patients in 2015.
Cyclotrons
;
Helium
;
Humans
;
Korea*
;
Metallurgy
;
Particle Accelerators
;
Patient Positioning
;
Proton Therapy*
;
Protons*
;
Radiation Oncology
;
Respiratory System
;
Seoul